Same-day discharge vs. inpatient stay in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Zina Mobarak, Shahd Mobarak, Salma Mahmoud, Hussameldin M Nour, Ashok Menon
{"title":"Same-day discharge vs. inpatient stay in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zina Mobarak, Shahd Mobarak, Salma Mahmoud, Hussameldin M Nour, Ashok Menon","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric operation globally. Same-day discharge (SDD) LSG is now becoming increasingly common, with many studies reporting this to be safe when compared to a postoperative inpatient (IP) stay. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare outcomes between patients undergoing LSG as SDD and IP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was developed and used to search the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. The primary outcome measures were mortality, emergency room (ER) visits, readmission, and reoperation. Secondary outcomes were morbidity, postoperative leak, length of stay of rehospitalization, cancellation of planned day-case, reasons for cancellations, postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE), and postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for outcomes using fixed- or random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 studies were identified and included in the qualitative analysis, with a total of 138 001 patients in the SDD (25 069) or IP (112 932) groups. Seven studies with a total of 3737 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The number of ER visits was significantly higher in the IP group compared to the SDD group (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.09-2.13, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the readmission rate (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.80-2.76, P = 0.21) or the reoperation rate (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.12-3.25, P = 0.58). Mortality and morbidity were low in all studies where they were reported and were largely similar across the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, SDD LSG when compared to IP LSG is safe and not associated with higher mortality, morbidity, readmission, reoperation rates, or ER visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric operation globally. Same-day discharge (SDD) LSG is now becoming increasingly common, with many studies reporting this to be safe when compared to a postoperative inpatient (IP) stay. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare outcomes between patients undergoing LSG as SDD and IP.

Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was developed and used to search the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. The primary outcome measures were mortality, emergency room (ER) visits, readmission, and reoperation. Secondary outcomes were morbidity, postoperative leak, length of stay of rehospitalization, cancellation of planned day-case, reasons for cancellations, postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE), and postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for outcomes using fixed- or random-effects models.

Results: 11 studies were identified and included in the qualitative analysis, with a total of 138 001 patients in the SDD (25 069) or IP (112 932) groups. Seven studies with a total of 3737 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The number of ER visits was significantly higher in the IP group compared to the SDD group (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.09-2.13, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the readmission rate (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.80-2.76, P = 0.21) or the reoperation rate (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.12-3.25, P = 0.58). Mortality and morbidity were low in all studies where they were reported and were largely similar across the groups.

Conclusion: Overall, SDD LSG when compared to IP LSG is safe and not associated with higher mortality, morbidity, readmission, reoperation rates, or ER visits.

当日出院vs住院的腹腔镜袖胃切除术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)是全球最常用的减肥手术。当日出院(SDD) LSG现在变得越来越普遍,许多研究报告与术后住院(IP)住院相比,这是安全的。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较LSG作为SDD和IP的患者的结果。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。开发了一种搜索策略,并用于搜索MEDLINE/Pubmed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE和Scopus数据库。主要结局指标为死亡率、急诊室(ER)访问量、再入院和再手术。次要结局为发病率、术后漏诊、再住院时间、取消计划日病例、取消原因、术后肺栓塞(PE)和术后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。使用固定效应或随机效应模型计算结果的合并优势比和95%置信区间。结果:11项研究被纳入定性分析,SDD组(25 069)或IP组(112 932)共138 001例患者。meta分析纳入了7项研究,共3737例患者。与SDD组相比,IP组的急诊就诊次数显著增加(OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.09-2.13, P = 0.01)。两组再入院率(OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.80 ~ 2.76, P = 0.21)和再手术率(OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.12 ~ 3.25, P = 0.58)差异无统计学意义。在所有被报道的研究中,死亡率和发病率都很低,而且各组之间基本相似。结论:总体而言,与IP LSG相比,SDD LSG是安全的,并且与更高的死亡率、发病率、再入院率、再手术率或急诊就诊率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信