Novel endometrial receptivity test increases clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in patients with recurrent implantation failure: Secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yu Zheng, Na Xu, Biao Chen, Jun Dai, Jian Bai, Bo Huang, Lei Jin, Xiyuan Dong, Zhou Li
{"title":"Novel endometrial receptivity test increases clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in patients with recurrent implantation failure: Secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial.","authors":"Yu Zheng, Na Xu, Biao Chen, Jun Dai, Jian Bai, Bo Huang, Lei Jin, Xiyuan Dong, Zhou Li","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of endometrial receptivity testing (ERT) in improving pregnancy outcomes for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and to investigate the incidence of implantation window displacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted between April 2021 and August 2022, at a university-affiliated reproductive center, the study included 85 RIF patients who had failed to achieve pregnancy after three embryo transfers. As part of a multicenter prospective cohort study (ChiCTR2200059342), 45 patients underwent ERT-guided frozen single blastocyst transfer, while 40 received standard treatment without ERT. Endometrial preparation was performed using a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol in the cycle preceding transfer. Endometrial sampling for ERT, including RNA sequencing, artificial intelligence, and discriminant analysis of endometrial receptivity, was conducted on day 5 after progesterone administration to determine the implantation window. The same HRT protocol was used in the transfer cycle, with embryo transfer timed according to the ERT-calculated window.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data showed that 28.07% of patients exhibited a displaced implantation window, all characterized by pre-receptive endometrium. The ERT group had significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates (57.78% vs. 35.00%, p = 0.036) and live birth rates (53.33% vs. 30.00%, p = 0.030) compared with the non-ERT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that approximately one-third of RIF occurrences may be due to endometrial factors, and ERT-guided personalized embryo transfer significantly improves pregnancy outcomes, underscoring its value in reproductive medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of endometrial receptivity testing (ERT) in improving pregnancy outcomes for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and to investigate the incidence of implantation window displacement.

Methods: Conducted between April 2021 and August 2022, at a university-affiliated reproductive center, the study included 85 RIF patients who had failed to achieve pregnancy after three embryo transfers. As part of a multicenter prospective cohort study (ChiCTR2200059342), 45 patients underwent ERT-guided frozen single blastocyst transfer, while 40 received standard treatment without ERT. Endometrial preparation was performed using a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol in the cycle preceding transfer. Endometrial sampling for ERT, including RNA sequencing, artificial intelligence, and discriminant analysis of endometrial receptivity, was conducted on day 5 after progesterone administration to determine the implantation window. The same HRT protocol was used in the transfer cycle, with embryo transfer timed according to the ERT-calculated window.

Results: Our data showed that 28.07% of patients exhibited a displaced implantation window, all characterized by pre-receptive endometrium. The ERT group had significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates (57.78% vs. 35.00%, p = 0.036) and live birth rates (53.33% vs. 30.00%, p = 0.030) compared with the non-ERT group.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that approximately one-third of RIF occurrences may be due to endometrial factors, and ERT-guided personalized embryo transfer significantly improves pregnancy outcomes, underscoring its value in reproductive medicine.

新型子宫内膜容受性试验提高复发性植入失败患者的临床妊娠率和活产率:一项前瞻性临床试验的二次分析。
目的:本研究旨在评价子宫内膜容受性试验(ERT)改善复发性着床失败(RIF)患者妊娠结局的效果,并探讨着床窗移位的发生率。方法:该研究于2021年4月至2022年8月在一所大学附属生殖中心进行,包括85名在三次胚胎移植后未能成功怀孕的RIF患者。作为一项多中心前瞻性队列研究(ChiCTR2200059342)的一部分,45名患者接受了ERT引导的冷冻单囊胚移植,而40名患者接受了没有ERT的标准治疗。子宫内膜准备在移植前使用激素替代疗法(HRT)方案进行。孕酮给药后第5天进行子宫内膜ERT取样,包括RNA测序、人工智能和子宫内膜容受性判别分析,以确定着床窗口。移植周期采用相同的HRT方案,根据ert计算窗口进行胚胎移植。结果:我们的数据显示,28.07%的患者出现了移位的植入窗口,所有的特征都是接受前子宫内膜。ERT组临床妊娠率(57.78% vs. 35.00%, p = 0.036)和活产率(53.33% vs. 30.00%, p = 0.030)显著高于非ERT组。结论:我们的研究结果表明,大约三分之一的RIF发生可能是由子宫内膜因素引起的,ert引导的个性化胚胎移植显著改善了妊娠结局,强调了其在生殖医学中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信