The real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with ulcerative colitis in the United States.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-06 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2494642
Sabree Burbage, Hannah Knight, Bridget Godwin, Rachael Meadows, William Jones, Ruizhi Zhao, Sumesh Kachroo
{"title":"The real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with ulcerative colitis in the United States.","authors":"Sabree Burbage, Hannah Knight, Bridget Godwin, Rachael Meadows, William Jones, Ruizhi Zhao, Sumesh Kachroo","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2494642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ustekinumab was approved for use in the treatment of moderate/severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in 2019. Though it has proven effective in clinical trials, evidence of its effectiveness in clinical practice is limited to the published reports of use in clinical practice. This study assessed ustekinumab effectiveness in patients with UC presenting in real-world clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their IBD patients in the USA from December 2022 to January 2024. Physicians provided demographics and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, symptoms, and remission status for UC patients aged ≥18 years old who were prescribed ustekinumab for >1 day. Analyses were descriptive; McNemar's test was used to compare symptoms and disease severity before and after ustekinumab prescription.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 56 physicians reported on 185 patients. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 39.7 (12.9) years and 53.0% were female. Most patients were advanced therapy-naïve at ustekinumab initiation (65.9%) and had taken ustekinumab for ≥3 months (84.6%). At survey, 53.0% were in remission defined by Mayo score, and 61.9% were in physician-stated clinical remission. Reports of abdominal pain, bowel urgency, nighttime urgency, and bloody diarrhea were more than halved at survey compared to pre-ustekinumab, with reductions in fatigue and non-bloody diarrhea also seen (all <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, ustekinumab is an effective treatment for UC in real-world clinical practice capable of inducing and maintaining long-term remission. Future work should assess how ustekinumab impacts quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"683-689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2494642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ustekinumab was approved for use in the treatment of moderate/severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in 2019. Though it has proven effective in clinical trials, evidence of its effectiveness in clinical practice is limited to the published reports of use in clinical practice. This study assessed ustekinumab effectiveness in patients with UC presenting in real-world clinical practice.

Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their IBD patients in the USA from December 2022 to January 2024. Physicians provided demographics and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, symptoms, and remission status for UC patients aged ≥18 years old who were prescribed ustekinumab for >1 day. Analyses were descriptive; McNemar's test was used to compare symptoms and disease severity before and after ustekinumab prescription.

Results: Overall, 56 physicians reported on 185 patients. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 39.7 (12.9) years and 53.0% were female. Most patients were advanced therapy-naïve at ustekinumab initiation (65.9%) and had taken ustekinumab for ≥3 months (84.6%). At survey, 53.0% were in remission defined by Mayo score, and 61.9% were in physician-stated clinical remission. Reports of abdominal pain, bowel urgency, nighttime urgency, and bloody diarrhea were more than halved at survey compared to pre-ustekinumab, with reductions in fatigue and non-bloody diarrhea also seen (all p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Overall, ustekinumab is an effective treatment for UC in real-world clinical practice capable of inducing and maintaining long-term remission. Future work should assess how ustekinumab impacts quality of life.

ustekinumab在美国溃疡性结肠炎患者中的实际疗效。
背景:Ustekinumab于2019年被批准用于治疗中/重度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。虽然它在临床试验中被证明是有效的,但在临床实践中证明其有效性的证据仅限于在临床实践中使用的已发表的报告。本研究评估了ustekinumab在现实世界临床实践中对UC患者的有效性。方法:数据来自Adelphi真实世界炎症性肠病(IBD)疾病特异性计划,这是一项对美国医生及其IBD患者的横断面调查,时间为2022年12月至2024年1月。医生提供了年龄≥18岁的UC患者的人口统计学和临床特征、治疗模式、症状和缓解状态,这些患者使用ustekinumab治疗100天。分析是描述性的;McNemar试验用于比较ustekinumab处方前后的症状和疾病严重程度。结果:总体而言,56名医生报告了185名患者。患者平均(标准差)年龄为39.7(12.9)岁,53.0%为女性。大多数患者在ustekinumab起始时为晚期therapy-naïve(65.9%),并且服用ustekinumab≥3个月(84.6%)。在调查中,53.0%的患者处于梅奥评分定义的缓解期,61.9%的患者处于医生报告的临床缓解期。在调查中,与ustekinumab前相比,腹痛、肠急症、夜间急症和血性腹泻的报告减少了一半以上,疲劳和非血性腹泻也减少了(所有p结论:总体而言,ustekinumab在现实世界的临床实践中是UC的有效治疗方法,能够诱导和维持长期缓解。未来的工作应该评估ustekinumab如何影响生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信