Myrna Cristina Bonaldo, Samuel Goldenberg, Ricardo Galler, Claudia Nunes Duarte Dos Santos
{"title":"Dengue: Historical Aspects.","authors":"Myrna Cristina Bonaldo, Samuel Goldenberg, Ricardo Galler, Claudia Nunes Duarte Dos Santos","doi":"10.1007/82_2025_289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To write about dengue retrospective epidemiology is a challenging subject because until laboratory diagnosis tests were developed to confirm human infections by dengue virus (DENV) between 1940 and 1950, all reports about disease or epidemics referred to a generic \"dengue/break bone fever/contagious fever/bilious remitting fever.\" These nomenclatures employed in past times had perspectives based on medical reports, letters and diaries of people living in the affected areas at the time, and local newspaper reports. As Packard (Bull Hist Med 90(2):193-221) highlighted, the difficulty of using historical sources and \"the ambiguous nature\" of eighteenth-century disease categories turns the analysis puzzling. Nevertheless, if judiciously used, it can illuminate the history of dengue epidemics over time.In this chapter, we will focus on three periods that were pivotal to shaping our current understanding of dengue disease and epidemiology: (1) First reports of a dengue-like disease and the impact of the infection during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; (2) The impact of the II World War (II WW) on the spread of the DENV and its vector worldwide; and (3) The re-introduction of dengue in the Americas and the challenge of Public Health services to control the dramatic escalation of cases and the introduction of new serotypes/genotypes. It is worth mentioning that in the last years, South and Central America and Caribe account for more than 80% of dengue cases in the world (PAHO).</p>","PeriodicalId":11102,"journal":{"name":"Current topics in microbiology and immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current topics in microbiology and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2025_289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To write about dengue retrospective epidemiology is a challenging subject because until laboratory diagnosis tests were developed to confirm human infections by dengue virus (DENV) between 1940 and 1950, all reports about disease or epidemics referred to a generic "dengue/break bone fever/contagious fever/bilious remitting fever." These nomenclatures employed in past times had perspectives based on medical reports, letters and diaries of people living in the affected areas at the time, and local newspaper reports. As Packard (Bull Hist Med 90(2):193-221) highlighted, the difficulty of using historical sources and "the ambiguous nature" of eighteenth-century disease categories turns the analysis puzzling. Nevertheless, if judiciously used, it can illuminate the history of dengue epidemics over time.In this chapter, we will focus on three periods that were pivotal to shaping our current understanding of dengue disease and epidemiology: (1) First reports of a dengue-like disease and the impact of the infection during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; (2) The impact of the II World War (II WW) on the spread of the DENV and its vector worldwide; and (3) The re-introduction of dengue in the Americas and the challenge of Public Health services to control the dramatic escalation of cases and the introduction of new serotypes/genotypes. It is worth mentioning that in the last years, South and Central America and Caribe account for more than 80% of dengue cases in the world (PAHO).
撰写关于登革热回顾性流行病学的文章是一项具有挑战性的课题,因为在1940年至1950年间开发出实验室诊断测试以确认登革热病毒(DENV)的人类感染之前,所有关于疾病或流行的报告都涉及通用的“登革热/断骨热/传染性热/胆汁缓解热”。过去使用的这些命名法基于医疗报告、当时生活在受影响地区的人们的信件和日记以及当地报纸的报道。正如Packard (Bull Hist Med 90(2):193-221)所强调的那样,使用历史资料的困难和18世纪疾病类别的“模糊性”使得分析令人费解。然而,如果使用得当,它可以阐明登革热流行的历史。在本章中,我们将重点关注三个时期,这三个时期对形成我们目前对登革热和流行病学的理解至关重要:(1)17世纪和18世纪首次报道登革热样疾病及其感染的影响;(2)第二次世界大战对登革热及其病媒在世界范围内传播的影响;(3)登革热在美洲的重新传入以及公共卫生服务在控制病例急剧上升和引入新的血清型/基因型方面面临的挑战。值得一提的是,在过去几年中,南美洲和中美洲及加勒比地区占世界登革热病例的80%以上(泛美卫生组织)。
期刊介绍:
The review series Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology provides a synthesis of the latest research findings in the areas of molecular immunology, bacteriology and virology. Each timely volume contains a wealth of information on the featured subject. This review series is designed to provide access to up-to-date, often previously unpublished information.