Gamma oscillations as correlates of depression: updating Fitzgerald and Watson (2018).

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Sarah L Coleman, Christopher F Sharpley, Kirstan A Vessey, Ian D Evans, Rebecca J Williams, Vicki Bitsika
{"title":"Gamma oscillations as correlates of depression: updating Fitzgerald and Watson (2018).","authors":"Sarah L Coleman, Christopher F Sharpley, Kirstan A Vessey, Ian D Evans, Rebecca J Williams, Vicki Bitsika","doi":"10.1515/revneuro-2025-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression remains one of the most common and debilitating neuropsychiatric conditions, with little consistency in treatment efficacy. Some of the lack of success in developing effective treatments has been the absence of a reliable biomarker of depression, despite many attempts. One such potential biomarker is the electrical activity of the brain that occurs in the gamma band (30-200 Hz). To evaluate the state of research into gamma as a biomarker of depression, a review of recent research literature was conducted. A total of 31 relevant papers was identified, 22 of which used resting-state studies, and nine included a stimulus-task. These studies were examined here in terms of their definition of gamma, sample sizes, research focus, brain region examined, and EEG methodologies used. Due to the range of methodologies, some inconsistent results emerged but several valuable findings remained, including that depressed patients usually had higher gamma power than their healthy controls (HC), that the imposition of a perceptual task into the research protocol also introduced a strong element of confound to the results, and that studies that sought to evaluate the role of gamma in treatment were yet to be established as reliable. Key issues for future research are discussed, and the potential for gamma as a biomarker of depression is evaluated as emerging.</p>","PeriodicalId":49623,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2025-0023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression remains one of the most common and debilitating neuropsychiatric conditions, with little consistency in treatment efficacy. Some of the lack of success in developing effective treatments has been the absence of a reliable biomarker of depression, despite many attempts. One such potential biomarker is the electrical activity of the brain that occurs in the gamma band (30-200 Hz). To evaluate the state of research into gamma as a biomarker of depression, a review of recent research literature was conducted. A total of 31 relevant papers was identified, 22 of which used resting-state studies, and nine included a stimulus-task. These studies were examined here in terms of their definition of gamma, sample sizes, research focus, brain region examined, and EEG methodologies used. Due to the range of methodologies, some inconsistent results emerged but several valuable findings remained, including that depressed patients usually had higher gamma power than their healthy controls (HC), that the imposition of a perceptual task into the research protocol also introduced a strong element of confound to the results, and that studies that sought to evaluate the role of gamma in treatment were yet to be established as reliable. Key issues for future research are discussed, and the potential for gamma as a biomarker of depression is evaluated as emerging.

伽马振荡与抑郁相关:更新Fitzgerald和Watson(2018)。
抑郁症仍然是最常见和最衰弱的神经精神疾病之一,治疗效果几乎没有一致性。在开发有效治疗方法方面缺乏成功的部分原因是,尽管进行了许多尝试,但缺乏可靠的抑郁症生物标志物。其中一个潜在的生物标记是发生在伽马波段(30-200 Hz)的大脑电活动。为了评估伽马作为抑郁症生物标志物的研究现状,我们对最近的研究文献进行了回顾。共有31篇相关论文被确定,其中22篇使用静息状态研究,9篇包含刺激任务。这些研究在这里根据伽马的定义、样本量、研究重点、检查的大脑区域和使用的脑电图方法进行了检查。由于方法的差异,出现了一些不一致的结果,但仍有一些有价值的发现,包括抑郁症患者通常比健康对照(HC)具有更高的伽马能量,在研究方案中强加感知任务也给结果带来了强烈的混淆因素,以及试图评估伽马在治疗中的作用的研究尚未被确定为可靠的。讨论了未来研究的关键问题,并评估了伽马作为抑郁症生物标志物的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Reviews in the Neurosciences 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in the Neurosciences provides a forum for reviews, critical evaluations and theoretical treatment of selective topics in the neurosciences. The journal is meant to provide an authoritative reference work for those interested in the structure and functions of the nervous system at all levels of analysis, including the genetic, molecular, cellular, behavioral, cognitive and clinical neurosciences. Contributions should contain a critical appraisal of specific areas and not simply a compilation of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信