Laura D Schell, Katia S Chadaideh, Cary R Allen-Blevins, Emily M Venable, Rachel N Carmody
{"title":"Dietary preservatives alter the gut microbiota in vitro and in vivo with sex-specific consequences for host metabolic development in a mouse model","authors":"Laura D Schell, Katia S Chadaideh, Cary R Allen-Blevins, Emily M Venable, Rachel N Carmody","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Antibiotics in early life can promote adiposity via interactions with the gut microbiota, but they represent only one possible route of antimicrobial exposure. Dietary preservatives exhibit antimicrobial activity, contain chemical structures accessible to microbial enzymes, and may therefore similarly disrupt microbial contributions to metabolic development.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Here, we test the hypothesis that preservatives alter the gut microbiota with consequences for host metabolism.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We screened common dietary preservatives for in vitro and ex vivo activity against a panel of gut bacteria and whole fecal microbial communities, profiling outcomes via optical density measurements and 16S rDNA sequencing. We then exposed adult mice to diet-relevant doses of 4 preservatives [acetic acid, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and sodium sulfite] or ampicillin (positive control) for 7 d<em>.</em> Finally, we examined the effects of early-life EDTA and low-dose ampicillin exposure starting in gestation in a mouse model, tracking differences in growth and metabolism.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Preservatives altered microbial growth and community structure in vitro<em>,</em> ex vivo<em>,</em> and in vivo, but with compound-specific changes in gut microbiota composition distinct from those of ampicillin. Long-term EDTA exposure from gestation reduced calorie absorption and cecal acetate, resulting in 32% lower gains in body fat in females for a given food intake (±12% standard error, linear mixed effects model). Females exposed to ampicillin exhibited a similar 42% (±11%) reduction in food-adjusted gains in adiposity, along with larger brains and smaller livers. By contrast, among males, EDTA had no detectable metabolic impacts whereas ampicillin exposure increased food-adjusted gain in body fat by 108% (±12%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results highlight the potential for everyday doses of common preservatives to affect the gut microbiota and impact metabolism differently in males and females. Thus, despite their generally regarded as safe designation, preservatives could have unintended consequences for consumer health via their impact on the gut microbiota.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"122 1","pages":"Pages 221-234"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916525001960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Antibiotics in early life can promote adiposity via interactions with the gut microbiota, but they represent only one possible route of antimicrobial exposure. Dietary preservatives exhibit antimicrobial activity, contain chemical structures accessible to microbial enzymes, and may therefore similarly disrupt microbial contributions to metabolic development.
Objectives
Here, we test the hypothesis that preservatives alter the gut microbiota with consequences for host metabolism.
Methods
We screened common dietary preservatives for in vitro and ex vivo activity against a panel of gut bacteria and whole fecal microbial communities, profiling outcomes via optical density measurements and 16S rDNA sequencing. We then exposed adult mice to diet-relevant doses of 4 preservatives [acetic acid, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and sodium sulfite] or ampicillin (positive control) for 7 d. Finally, we examined the effects of early-life EDTA and low-dose ampicillin exposure starting in gestation in a mouse model, tracking differences in growth and metabolism.
Results
Preservatives altered microbial growth and community structure in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo, but with compound-specific changes in gut microbiota composition distinct from those of ampicillin. Long-term EDTA exposure from gestation reduced calorie absorption and cecal acetate, resulting in 32% lower gains in body fat in females for a given food intake (±12% standard error, linear mixed effects model). Females exposed to ampicillin exhibited a similar 42% (±11%) reduction in food-adjusted gains in adiposity, along with larger brains and smaller livers. By contrast, among males, EDTA had no detectable metabolic impacts whereas ampicillin exposure increased food-adjusted gain in body fat by 108% (±12%).
Conclusions
Our results highlight the potential for everyday doses of common preservatives to affect the gut microbiota and impact metabolism differently in males and females. Thus, despite their generally regarded as safe designation, preservatives could have unintended consequences for consumer health via their impact on the gut microbiota.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism.
Purpose:
The purpose of AJCN is to:
Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition.
Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits.
Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition.
Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches.
Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles.
Peer Review Process:
All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.