Cross-cultural differences in weight loss maintenance: a comparison between North America and Europe.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
International Journal of Obesity Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1038/s41366-025-01770-0
Suzanne Phelan, Michelle I Cardel, Alexandra M Lee, Noemi Alarcon, Nicholas A Elich, Mark Hiroshi Sugita Troftgruben, Gary D Foster
{"title":"Cross-cultural differences in weight loss maintenance: a comparison between North America and Europe.","authors":"Suzanne Phelan, Michelle I Cardel, Alexandra M Lee, Noemi Alarcon, Nicholas A Elich, Mark Hiroshi Sugita Troftgruben, Gary D Foster","doi":"10.1038/s41366-025-01770-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare behavioral, psychosocial, and neighborhood environmental factors of long-term weight loss maintainers in North America and Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were weight loss maintainers in WeightWatchers in North America (n = 3656) and Europe (n = 624) who had maintained a ≥ 9.1 kg (21.7 kg on average) weight loss for ≥1 year (5.3 years on average) and had a current mean BMI of 29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Validated surveys assessed behavioral (e.g., self-weighing, dietary strategies, restaurant eating, physical activity, sedentary time) psychological (e.g., habit strength, future focus, diet consistency, motivation, quality of life, body image, internalized weight bias), and neighborhood environment factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weight loss maintainers in North America vs. Europe had higher odds of weekly self-weighing (95% vs. 91%; OR = 1.7 [95% CI: 1.1, 2.5]), eating at fast food restaurants ≥weekly (11.6% vs. 2.6%; 7.7 [3.9, 14.3]; p < 0.001]), and other restaurants (29.7% vs 17.3%; OR = 1.47 [1.2, 2.1]; p < 0.001), more positive scores for body image (21.4 vs.20.7; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.253; p < 0.001) and body satisfaction (28.7 vs 22.8; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.248; p < 0.001), less weight bias internalization (3.0 vs 3.1; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.320; p < 0.001), shape concerns (2.3 vs 2.4; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.181; p < 0.001) and weight concerns (2.6 vs2.7; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.176; p < 0.001), and higher quality of life (75.0 vs. 73.4; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.154; p < 0.001), including general health perception (72.3 vs 68.1; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.187; p < 0.00), and physical functioning (81.3 vs 79.2; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.252; p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression, the variables that most strongly differentiated weight loss maintainers in North America and Europe were fast food consumption (OR = 10.8 [4.6, 25.5] p < 0.001) and self-weighing (OR = 1.9 [1.2,3.0]; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weight loss maintainers in North America and Europe differed in restaurant eating and self-weighing practices but otherwise reported similar behavioral, psychological, and environmental strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"1297-1306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01770-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare behavioral, psychosocial, and neighborhood environmental factors of long-term weight loss maintainers in North America and Europe.

Methods: Participants were weight loss maintainers in WeightWatchers in North America (n = 3656) and Europe (n = 624) who had maintained a ≥ 9.1 kg (21.7 kg on average) weight loss for ≥1 year (5.3 years on average) and had a current mean BMI of 29.9 kg/m2. Validated surveys assessed behavioral (e.g., self-weighing, dietary strategies, restaurant eating, physical activity, sedentary time) psychological (e.g., habit strength, future focus, diet consistency, motivation, quality of life, body image, internalized weight bias), and neighborhood environment factors.

Results: Weight loss maintainers in North America vs. Europe had higher odds of weekly self-weighing (95% vs. 91%; OR = 1.7 [95% CI: 1.1, 2.5]), eating at fast food restaurants ≥weekly (11.6% vs. 2.6%; 7.7 [3.9, 14.3]; p < 0.001]), and other restaurants (29.7% vs 17.3%; OR = 1.47 [1.2, 2.1]; p < 0.001), more positive scores for body image (21.4 vs.20.7; ηp2 = 0.253; p < 0.001) and body satisfaction (28.7 vs 22.8; ηp2 = 0.248; p < 0.001), less weight bias internalization (3.0 vs 3.1; ηp2 = 0.320; p < 0.001), shape concerns (2.3 vs 2.4; ηp2 = 0.181; p < 0.001) and weight concerns (2.6 vs2.7; ηp2 = 0.176; p < 0.001), and higher quality of life (75.0 vs. 73.4; ηp2 = 0.154; p < 0.001), including general health perception (72.3 vs 68.1; ηp2 = 0.187; p < 0.00), and physical functioning (81.3 vs 79.2; ηp2 = 0.252; p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression, the variables that most strongly differentiated weight loss maintainers in North America and Europe were fast food consumption (OR = 10.8 [4.6, 25.5] p < 0.001) and self-weighing (OR = 1.9 [1.2,3.0]; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Weight loss maintainers in North America and Europe differed in restaurant eating and self-weighing practices but otherwise reported similar behavioral, psychological, and environmental strategies.

减肥维持的跨文化差异:北美和欧洲的比较。
背景:本研究的目的是比较北美和欧洲长期减肥者的行为、社会心理和社区环境因素。方法:参与者是北美(n = 3656)和欧洲(n = 624)的体重维持者,他们保持≥9.1 kg(平均21.7 kg)体重减轻≥1年(平均5.3年),目前平均BMI为29.9 kg/m2。经过验证的调查评估了行为(例如,自我称重、饮食策略、餐馆饮食、体育活动、久坐时间)心理(例如,习惯强度、未来焦点、饮食一致性、动机、生活质量、身体形象、内在体重偏见)和社区环境因素。结果:与欧洲相比,北美的减肥维持者每周自我称重的几率更高(95%对91%;OR = 1.7 [95% CI: 1.1, 2.5]),每周在快餐店就餐≥一次(11.6% vs. 2.6%;7.7 [3.9, 14.3];P p2 = 0.253;p p2 = 0.248;p p2 = 0.320;p p2 = 0.181;p p2 = 0.176;p p2 = 0.154;p p2 = 0.187;p p2 = 0.252;结论:北美和欧洲的减肥维持者在餐馆饮食和自我称重方面存在差异,但在其他方面报告了相似的行为、心理和环境策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Obesity
International Journal of Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders. We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信