Self-reported Sexual Health-Related Outcomes in Gynecological Cancer Survivors: Results From a Quasi-experimental Multicenter Intervention Study on Follow-up After Gynecological Cancer Treatment.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Anita Paulsen, Liv Fegran, Milada Hagen, Ingvild Vistad
{"title":"Self-reported Sexual Health-Related Outcomes in Gynecological Cancer Survivors: Results From a Quasi-experimental Multicenter Intervention Study on Follow-up After Gynecological Cancer Treatment.","authors":"Anita Paulsen, Liv Fegran, Milada Hagen, Ingvild Vistad","doi":"10.1097/NCC.0000000000001493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gynecological cancer survivors often face sexual health challenges posttreatment, making interventions to address these issues essential.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate changes in sexual health-related outcomes among gynecological cancer survivors comparing 2 different follow-up models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This preplanned substudy utilized data from the Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology study. Participants were assigned to either the intervention or control group based on their treatment hospital. The control group received standard follow-up care, whereas the intervention group received shared follow-up care with sexual health communication. Analyses included 686 participants with sexual activity as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included feelings of reduced physical attractiveness for all, sexual enjoyment and vaginal dryness (sexually active participants), and reasons for sexual inactivity (sexually inactive participants). Assessments were conducted at the end of treatment and at 6 and 12 months posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant group differences were found in any of the outcomes at 12 months. The intervention group showed a more favorable trend in sexual activity at 6 months, not sustained at 12 months. Both groups experienced an increase in vaginal dryness. The absence of a partner was the most common reason for sexual inactivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that nurse-led sexual health communication during routine follow-up consultations may have a limited impact on the sexual health-related outcomes measured in this study.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>More intensive and individualized interventions may be necessary for significant improvements in the outcomes of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50713,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001493","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gynecological cancer survivors often face sexual health challenges posttreatment, making interventions to address these issues essential.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate changes in sexual health-related outcomes among gynecological cancer survivors comparing 2 different follow-up models.

Methods: This preplanned substudy utilized data from the Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology study. Participants were assigned to either the intervention or control group based on their treatment hospital. The control group received standard follow-up care, whereas the intervention group received shared follow-up care with sexual health communication. Analyses included 686 participants with sexual activity as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included feelings of reduced physical attractiveness for all, sexual enjoyment and vaginal dryness (sexually active participants), and reasons for sexual inactivity (sexually inactive participants). Assessments were conducted at the end of treatment and at 6 and 12 months posttreatment.

Results: No statistically significant group differences were found in any of the outcomes at 12 months. The intervention group showed a more favorable trend in sexual activity at 6 months, not sustained at 12 months. Both groups experienced an increase in vaginal dryness. The absence of a partner was the most common reason for sexual inactivity.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that nurse-led sexual health communication during routine follow-up consultations may have a limited impact on the sexual health-related outcomes measured in this study.

Implications for practice: More intensive and individualized interventions may be necessary for significant improvements in the outcomes of this study.

妇科癌症幸存者自我报告的性健康相关结局:来自妇科癌症治疗后随访的准实验性多中心干预研究的结果
背景:妇科癌症幸存者在治疗后经常面临性健康挑战,因此采取干预措施来解决这些问题至关重要。目的:本研究的目的是比较两种不同的随访模型,探讨妇科癌症幸存者性健康相关结局的变化。方法:这个预先计划的亚研究使用了生活方式和授权技术在妇科肿瘤生存研究中的数据。参与者根据他们的治疗医院被分配到干预组或对照组。对照组接受标准的随访治疗,干预组接受共享的随访治疗并进行性健康交流。分析包括686名以性行为为主要结局的参与者。次要结果包括所有人的身体吸引力下降的感觉,性享受和阴道干燥(性活跃的参与者),以及性不活跃的原因(性不活跃的参与者)。在治疗结束时以及治疗后6个月和12个月进行评估。结果:12个月时各组间各项结果均无统计学差异。干预组在6个月时表现出更有利的性行为趋势,但在12个月时没有持续。两组人的阴道干涩程度都有所增加。缺少伴侣是性行为不活跃的最常见原因。结论:研究结果表明,在常规随访咨询中,护士主导的性健康沟通可能对本研究中测量的性健康相关结果影响有限。对实践的启示:本研究结果的显著改善可能需要更密集和个性化的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Nursing
Cancer Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each bimonthly issue of Cancer Nursing™ addresses the whole spectrum of problems arising in the care and support of cancer patients--prevention and early detection, geriatric and pediatric cancer nursing, medical and surgical oncology, ambulatory care, nutritional support, psychosocial aspects of cancer, patient responses to all treatment modalities, and specific nursing interventions. The journal offers unparalleled coverage of cancer care delivery practices worldwide, as well as groundbreaking research findings and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信