Measurement of the femoral neck anteversion angle using a three-dimensional reconstruction in the fixed coordinate system based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck: an observational study.
Ruibao Yang, Jie Lin, Guibin Han, Guangliang Jiang, Yingsheng Deng
{"title":"Measurement of the femoral neck anteversion angle using a three-dimensional reconstruction in the fixed coordinate system based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck: an observational study.","authors":"Ruibao Yang, Jie Lin, Guibin Han, Guangliang Jiang, Yingsheng Deng","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02860-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the accessibility of 3D reconstruction in the fixed coordinate system(3D-R-FCS) based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck in measuring the femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CT and EOS examinations were performed on 40 femoral samples synthesized by Sawbone. Two evaluators were responsible for measurement of the FNAA based on four different methods, including EOS 3D reconstruction, 3D-R-FCS, Reikerås, and Murphy methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measurement of the FNAA based on EOS, 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck, and the Reikerås and Murphy methods were 6.53°±4.28°, 7.08°±4.58°, 3.03°±4.44°, and 11.9°±4.91°, respectively. No statistical difference was detected for the FNAA measurements between EOS and the 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck (P > 0.05). However, a statistical difference was detected between the Reikerås and Murphy methods and EOS (P < 0.05). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 4 methods measured by evaluator A were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.81, respectively, while the ICCs measured by evaluator B were 0.91, 0.98, 0.71, and 0.79, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the two evaluators were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.83, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The consistency of the scores for the FNAA measurement based on the 3D-R-FCS within and between the evaluators was the highest among the four methods and correlated well with the EOS measurement, which may potentially provide a more stable method for the measurement in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02860-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the accessibility of 3D reconstruction in the fixed coordinate system(3D-R-FCS) based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck in measuring the femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA).
Methods: CT and EOS examinations were performed on 40 femoral samples synthesized by Sawbone. Two evaluators were responsible for measurement of the FNAA based on four different methods, including EOS 3D reconstruction, 3D-R-FCS, Reikerås, and Murphy methods.
Results: Measurement of the FNAA based on EOS, 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck, and the Reikerås and Murphy methods were 6.53°±4.28°, 7.08°±4.58°, 3.03°±4.44°, and 11.9°±4.91°, respectively. No statistical difference was detected for the FNAA measurements between EOS and the 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck (P > 0.05). However, a statistical difference was detected between the Reikerås and Murphy methods and EOS (P < 0.05). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 4 methods measured by evaluator A were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.81, respectively, while the ICCs measured by evaluator B were 0.91, 0.98, 0.71, and 0.79, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the two evaluators were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.83, respectively.
Conclusion: The consistency of the scores for the FNAA measurement based on the 3D-R-FCS within and between the evaluators was the highest among the four methods and correlated well with the EOS measurement, which may potentially provide a more stable method for the measurement in clinical practice.
目的:探讨基于股骨颈基底前皮质在固定坐标系下三维重建(3D- r - fcs)测量股骨颈前倾角(FNAA)的可及性。方法:对40例由Sawbone合成的股骨标本进行CT和EOS检查。两名评估人员负责基于四种不同方法测量FNAA,包括EOS 3D重建、3D- r - fcs、reiker和Murphy方法。结果:基于EOS、基于股骨颈基底前皮质的3D-R-FCS、reiker法和Murphy法的FNAA测量值分别为6.53°±4.28°、7.08°±4.58°、3.03°±4.44°和11.9°±4.91°。EOS与基于股骨颈基底前皮质的3D-R-FCS的FNAA测量结果无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。结论:基于3D-R-FCS的FNAA测量结果在评估者内部和评估者之间的一致性最高,且与EOS测量结果具有良好的相关性,这可能为临床实践中提供一种更稳定的测量方法。临床试验号:不适用。