The world preparing for future pandemics and public health emergencies of international concern: Comparison of various multilateral access and benefit-sharing mechanisms and the impact of a new WHO mechanism for pathogens with pandemic potential on Japanese access and benefit-sharing policy.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Saki Nakamura, Makiko Matsuo
{"title":"The world preparing for future pandemics and public health emergencies of international concern: Comparison of various multilateral access and benefit-sharing mechanisms and the impact of a new WHO mechanism for pathogens with pandemic potential on Japanese access and benefit-sharing policy.","authors":"Saki Nakamura, Makiko Matsuo","doi":"10.35772/ghm.2025.01000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, there is a member-state-led discussion in the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body of the World Health Organization (WHO) to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement, or other international instrument under the Constitution of the WHO to strengthen global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response (WHO CA+). An access and benefit-sharing (ABS) mechanism for pathogens is likely to be a key element of this instrument, as it may provide legal certainty for rapid pathogen sharing and global access to medical countermeasures against future pandemics and in some cases public health emergencies of international concern, which are expected to be provided to countries in need. A multilateral ABS mechanism may resolve issues arising from the bilateral nature of the current ABS mechanism established under the Nagoya Protocol (which requires recipients to decipher the complex web of ABS legislation, thereby preventing rapid access to pathogens), and may also improve uneven global access to medical countermeasures during pandemics. This study analyzes the ongoing WHO discussion on ABS mechanisms while reviewing other examples of such mechanisms, including those outside the health sector. Additionally, there is a growing global interest in mapping national policies on ABS, as discussions on international policies are ongoing in multiple fora. This study furthermore introduces Japan's ABS policy, which is not widely known, and explores how the new WHO mechanism could affect Japan, namely highlighting the importance and the challenges of participating in such a system for industry and academia in the context of a developed country.</p>","PeriodicalId":12556,"journal":{"name":"Global health & medicine","volume":"7 2","pages":"127-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35772/ghm.2025.01000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, there is a member-state-led discussion in the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body of the World Health Organization (WHO) to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement, or other international instrument under the Constitution of the WHO to strengthen global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response (WHO CA+). An access and benefit-sharing (ABS) mechanism for pathogens is likely to be a key element of this instrument, as it may provide legal certainty for rapid pathogen sharing and global access to medical countermeasures against future pandemics and in some cases public health emergencies of international concern, which are expected to be provided to countries in need. A multilateral ABS mechanism may resolve issues arising from the bilateral nature of the current ABS mechanism established under the Nagoya Protocol (which requires recipients to decipher the complex web of ABS legislation, thereby preventing rapid access to pathogens), and may also improve uneven global access to medical countermeasures during pandemics. This study analyzes the ongoing WHO discussion on ABS mechanisms while reviewing other examples of such mechanisms, including those outside the health sector. Additionally, there is a growing global interest in mapping national policies on ABS, as discussions on international policies are ongoing in multiple fora. This study furthermore introduces Japan's ABS policy, which is not widely known, and explores how the new WHO mechanism could affect Japan, namely highlighting the importance and the challenges of participating in such a system for industry and academia in the context of a developed country.

世界为未来的大流行病和国际关注的突发公共卫生事件做准备:各种多边获取和惠益分享机制的比较以及世卫组织具有大流行潜力的病原体新机制对日本获取和惠益分享政策的影响。
目前,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)政府间谈判机构正在进行成员国主导的讨论,以根据世卫组织章程起草和谈判一项公约、协定或其他国际文书,以加强全球大流行的预防、准备和应对(世卫组织CA+)。病原体获取和惠益分享机制可能是这一文书的一个关键要素,因为它可能为快速共享病原体和全球获得应对未来流行病和在某些情况下引起国际关注的突发公共卫生事件的医疗对策提供法律确定性,这些对策预计将提供给有需要的国家。多边ABS机制可以解决根据《名古屋议定书》建立的现行ABS机制的双边性质所产生的问题(该机制要求受援国破译ABS立法的复杂网络,从而防止迅速获得病原体),还可以改善大流行病期间全球获得医疗对策的不平衡状况。本研究分析了世卫组织正在进行的关于ABS机制的讨论,同时审查了此类机制的其他例子,包括卫生部门以外的机制。此外,随着有关国际政策的讨论在多个论坛上进行,全球对制定ABS国家政策的兴趣日益浓厚。本研究进一步介绍了日本的ABS政策,这一政策并不广为人知,并探讨了新的WHO机制对日本的影响,即强调了在发达国家背景下,工业界和学术界参与这一制度的重要性和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信