Potential key genes for giant cell arteritis revealed based on single-cell sequencing and Mendelian randomization analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Tao Cheng, Jiafan Chen, Xinjue Shan, Bochao Jia, Sulin Sang, Yunkai Wang, Yi Wei, Yuanhui Hu
{"title":"Potential key genes for giant cell arteritis revealed based on single-cell sequencing and Mendelian randomization analysis.","authors":"Tao Cheng, Jiafan Chen, Xinjue Shan, Bochao Jia, Sulin Sang, Yunkai Wang, Yi Wei, Yuanhui Hu","doi":"10.1159/000546323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an autoimmune disease affecting medium and large arteries. It varies in presentation and often recurs, potentially leading to blindness and aneurysms. The pathogenesis of GCA is not well understood. This study aims to identify key genes linked to GCA and explore potential pathogenic mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study integrated single-cell RNA sequencing, expression quantitative trait loci, and genome-wide association study data, employing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method to explore the causal effects of marker genes in CD4+ T cells on the development of GCA. Additionally, colocalization analysis was conducted to determine whether there was a shared causal variant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through single-cell RNA sequencing and MR analysis, we identified three key genes, RCAN3, RPS6, and HLA-DQB1, that had a causal relationship with a reduced risk of GCA. Specifically, RCAN3 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.26-0.93, p = 0.03), RPS6 (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.06-0.73, p = 0.01), and HLA-DQB1 (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62-0.93, p = 0.01) were inversely associated with the disease. Multiple sensitivity analysis methods showed no heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and ruled out potential reverse causality, demonstrating the robustness of MR analysis results. Colocalization analysis revealed that HLA-DQB1 and GCA were related to SNPs within the same genomic region but involved different causal variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified three potential key genes (RCAN3, RPS6, HLA-DQB1) linked to the causality of GCA, providing new perspectives on the pathogenesis of GCA and new avenues for therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an autoimmune disease affecting medium and large arteries. It varies in presentation and often recurs, potentially leading to blindness and aneurysms. The pathogenesis of GCA is not well understood. This study aims to identify key genes linked to GCA and explore potential pathogenic mechanisms.

Methods: This study integrated single-cell RNA sequencing, expression quantitative trait loci, and genome-wide association study data, employing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method to explore the causal effects of marker genes in CD4+ T cells on the development of GCA. Additionally, colocalization analysis was conducted to determine whether there was a shared causal variant.

Results: Through single-cell RNA sequencing and MR analysis, we identified three key genes, RCAN3, RPS6, and HLA-DQB1, that had a causal relationship with a reduced risk of GCA. Specifically, RCAN3 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.26-0.93, p = 0.03), RPS6 (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.06-0.73, p = 0.01), and HLA-DQB1 (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62-0.93, p = 0.01) were inversely associated with the disease. Multiple sensitivity analysis methods showed no heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and ruled out potential reverse causality, demonstrating the robustness of MR analysis results. Colocalization analysis revealed that HLA-DQB1 and GCA were related to SNPs within the same genomic region but involved different causal variants.

Conclusions: This study identified three potential key genes (RCAN3, RPS6, HLA-DQB1) linked to the causality of GCA, providing new perspectives on the pathogenesis of GCA and new avenues for therapeutic strategies.

基于单细胞测序和孟德尔随机化分析揭示巨细胞动脉炎的潜在关键基因。
巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)是一种影响中、大动脉的自身免疫性疾病。它表现多样,经常复发,可能导致失明和动脉瘤。GCA的发病机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在鉴定与GCA相关的关键基因,探讨潜在的致病机制。方法:本研究整合单细胞RNA测序、表达数量性状位点和全基因组关联研究数据,采用双样本孟德尔随机化(Mendelian randomization, MR)方法,探讨CD4+ T细胞中标记基因对GCA发生的因果关系。此外,还进行了共定位分析,以确定是否存在共同的因果变异。结果:通过单细胞RNA测序和MR分析,我们确定了三个关键基因,RCAN3, RPS6和HLA-DQB1,它们与GCA风险降低有因果关系。具体而言,RCAN3 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.26-0.93, p = 0.03)、RPS6 (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.06-0.73, p = 0.01)和HLA-DQB1 (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62-0.93, p = 0.01)与该疾病呈负相关。多重敏感性分析方法未发现异质性和多效性,排除了潜在的反向因果关系,证明了MR分析结果的稳健性。共定位分析显示,HLA-DQB1和GCA与同一基因组区域内的snp相关,但涉及不同的因果变异。结论:本研究确定了与GCA因果关系相关的3个潜在关键基因(RCAN3、RPS6、HLA-DQB1),为GCA发病机制的研究提供了新的视角和治疗策略的新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信