Delphi Consensus on the Distinct Clinical and Histopathological Features of Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: Insights From the Hair Diseases EADV Task Force.
Michela Valeria Rita Starace, Francesca Pampaloni, Matilde Iorizzo, Zoe Apalla, Leila Asfour, Azael Freites-Martinez, Dimitrios Ioannides, Awatef Kelati, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Adriana Rakowska, Lidia Rudnicka, Andrea Sechi, Seyed Morteza Seyed Jafari, Anita Takwale, Anastasia Therianou, Anna Waśkiel-Burnat, Alexander Katoulis
{"title":"Delphi Consensus on the Distinct Clinical and Histopathological Features of Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: Insights From the Hair Diseases EADV Task Force.","authors":"Michela Valeria Rita Starace, Francesca Pampaloni, Matilde Iorizzo, Zoe Apalla, Leila Asfour, Azael Freites-Martinez, Dimitrios Ioannides, Awatef Kelati, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Adriana Rakowska, Lidia Rudnicka, Andrea Sechi, Seyed Morteza Seyed Jafari, Anita Takwale, Anastasia Therianou, Anna Waśkiel-Burnat, Alexander Katoulis","doi":"10.1111/ijd.17780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) has been defined as a lichen planopilaris (LPP) variant, and both are characterized by lymphocytic scarring alopecia. Despite histopathological similarities, they differ clinically, suggesting potentially different pathogenetic factors. This Delphi study aimed to collect expert opinions to clarify the relationship between FFA and LPP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Delphi method was employed via an anonymous survey among experts in hair disorders from the Hair Diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), ensuring broad international representation. Two rounds of online questionnaires assessed the definition, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of LPP and FFA. The statements, developed based on an extensive literature review, were validated by the core expert panel. A 5-point Likert scale was utilized to quantify agreement levels, with strong consensus defined as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement. Statements lacking strong consensus in the first round were revised and merged for inclusion in the second round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen experts from seven countries joined the Delphi consensus process. In the first round, 65 statements underwent qualitative content analysis, yielding strong consensus in 30.7% of cases. Participants provided written justifications for their assessments. In the second round, an increased consensus rate (53.7%) was reached after the expert panel statement's revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms that FFA and LPP are clinical variants within the same lichenoid spectrum. While moderate consensus supports FFA as a variant of LPP, uncertainties remain regarding its demographic distribution, the presence of vellus hairs, and blue-gray dots. The study refines diagnostic and management approaches but is limited by the absence of dermatopathologists and basic researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.17780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) has been defined as a lichen planopilaris (LPP) variant, and both are characterized by lymphocytic scarring alopecia. Despite histopathological similarities, they differ clinically, suggesting potentially different pathogenetic factors. This Delphi study aimed to collect expert opinions to clarify the relationship between FFA and LPP.
Methods: The Delphi method was employed via an anonymous survey among experts in hair disorders from the Hair Diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), ensuring broad international representation. Two rounds of online questionnaires assessed the definition, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of LPP and FFA. The statements, developed based on an extensive literature review, were validated by the core expert panel. A 5-point Likert scale was utilized to quantify agreement levels, with strong consensus defined as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement. Statements lacking strong consensus in the first round were revised and merged for inclusion in the second round.
Results: Seventeen experts from seven countries joined the Delphi consensus process. In the first round, 65 statements underwent qualitative content analysis, yielding strong consensus in 30.7% of cases. Participants provided written justifications for their assessments. In the second round, an increased consensus rate (53.7%) was reached after the expert panel statement's revision.
Conclusions: This study confirms that FFA and LPP are clinical variants within the same lichenoid spectrum. While moderate consensus supports FFA as a variant of LPP, uncertainties remain regarding its demographic distribution, the presence of vellus hairs, and blue-gray dots. The study refines diagnostic and management approaches but is limited by the absence of dermatopathologists and basic researchers.
期刊介绍:
Published monthly, the International Journal of Dermatology is specifically designed to provide dermatologists around the world with a regular, up-to-date source of information on all aspects of the diagnosis and management of skin diseases. Accepted articles regularly cover clinical trials; education; morphology; pharmacology and therapeutics; case reports, and reviews. Additional features include tropical medical reports, news, correspondence, proceedings and transactions, and education.
The International Journal of Dermatology is guided by a distinguished, international editorial board and emphasizes a global approach to continuing medical education for physicians and other providers of health care with a specific interest in problems relating to the skin.