Delphi Consensus on the Distinct Clinical and Histopathological Features of Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: Insights From the Hair Diseases EADV Task Force.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Michela Valeria Rita Starace, Francesca Pampaloni, Matilde Iorizzo, Zoe Apalla, Leila Asfour, Azael Freites-Martinez, Dimitrios Ioannides, Awatef Kelati, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Adriana Rakowska, Lidia Rudnicka, Andrea Sechi, Seyed Morteza Seyed Jafari, Anita Takwale, Anastasia Therianou, Anna Waśkiel-Burnat, Alexander Katoulis
{"title":"Delphi Consensus on the Distinct Clinical and Histopathological Features of Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: Insights From the Hair Diseases EADV Task Force.","authors":"Michela Valeria Rita Starace, Francesca Pampaloni, Matilde Iorizzo, Zoe Apalla, Leila Asfour, Azael Freites-Martinez, Dimitrios Ioannides, Awatef Kelati, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Adriana Rakowska, Lidia Rudnicka, Andrea Sechi, Seyed Morteza Seyed Jafari, Anita Takwale, Anastasia Therianou, Anna Waśkiel-Burnat, Alexander Katoulis","doi":"10.1111/ijd.17780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) has been defined as a lichen planopilaris (LPP) variant, and both are characterized by lymphocytic scarring alopecia. Despite histopathological similarities, they differ clinically, suggesting potentially different pathogenetic factors. This Delphi study aimed to collect expert opinions to clarify the relationship between FFA and LPP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Delphi method was employed via an anonymous survey among experts in hair disorders from the Hair Diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), ensuring broad international representation. Two rounds of online questionnaires assessed the definition, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of LPP and FFA. The statements, developed based on an extensive literature review, were validated by the core expert panel. A 5-point Likert scale was utilized to quantify agreement levels, with strong consensus defined as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement. Statements lacking strong consensus in the first round were revised and merged for inclusion in the second round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen experts from seven countries joined the Delphi consensus process. In the first round, 65 statements underwent qualitative content analysis, yielding strong consensus in 30.7% of cases. Participants provided written justifications for their assessments. In the second round, an increased consensus rate (53.7%) was reached after the expert panel statement's revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms that FFA and LPP are clinical variants within the same lichenoid spectrum. While moderate consensus supports FFA as a variant of LPP, uncertainties remain regarding its demographic distribution, the presence of vellus hairs, and blue-gray dots. The study refines diagnostic and management approaches but is limited by the absence of dermatopathologists and basic researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.17780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) has been defined as a lichen planopilaris (LPP) variant, and both are characterized by lymphocytic scarring alopecia. Despite histopathological similarities, they differ clinically, suggesting potentially different pathogenetic factors. This Delphi study aimed to collect expert opinions to clarify the relationship between FFA and LPP.

Methods: The Delphi method was employed via an anonymous survey among experts in hair disorders from the Hair Diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), ensuring broad international representation. Two rounds of online questionnaires assessed the definition, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of LPP and FFA. The statements, developed based on an extensive literature review, were validated by the core expert panel. A 5-point Likert scale was utilized to quantify agreement levels, with strong consensus defined as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement. Statements lacking strong consensus in the first round were revised and merged for inclusion in the second round.

Results: Seventeen experts from seven countries joined the Delphi consensus process. In the first round, 65 statements underwent qualitative content analysis, yielding strong consensus in 30.7% of cases. Participants provided written justifications for their assessments. In the second round, an increased consensus rate (53.7%) was reached after the expert panel statement's revision.

Conclusions: This study confirms that FFA and LPP are clinical variants within the same lichenoid spectrum. While moderate consensus supports FFA as a variant of LPP, uncertainties remain regarding its demographic distribution, the presence of vellus hairs, and blue-gray dots. The study refines diagnostic and management approaches but is limited by the absence of dermatopathologists and basic researchers.

关于扁平苔藓和额部纤维化性脱发的独特临床和组织病理学特征的德尔菲共识:来自头发疾病EADV工作组的见解。
背景:额部纤维化性脱发(FFA)被定义为扁平苔藓(LPP)变体,两者都以淋巴细胞瘢痕性脱发为特征。尽管组织病理学相似,但它们在临床上不同,提示潜在的不同致病因素。本德尔菲研究旨在收集专家意见,阐明FFA与LPP之间的关系。方法:采用德尔菲法,对欧洲皮肤病和性病学会(EADV)头发疾病工作组的专家进行匿名调查,以确保广泛的国际代表性。两轮在线问卷评估LPP和FFA的定义、临床表现、诊断和管理。这些陈述是基于广泛的文献综述而制定的,并得到了核心专家小组的验证。5分李克特量表用于量化一致性水平,强一致性定义为≥75%的同意或不同意。在第一轮中缺乏强烈协商一致意见的发言经过修订和合并,纳入第二轮。结果:来自7个国家的17位专家参与了德尔菲共识过程。在第一轮中,65个陈述进行了定性内容分析,在30.7%的案例中产生了强烈的共识。参与者为他们的评估提供了书面理由。在第二轮中,经过专家组声明的修订,达成了更高的共识率(53.7%)。结论:本研究证实FFA和LPP是同一类地衣谱内的临床变异。虽然普遍认为FFA是LPP的一种变体,但其人口分布、牛皮毛和蓝灰点的存在仍存在不确定性。该研究改进了诊断和管理方法,但由于缺乏皮肤病理学家和基础研究人员而受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
476
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published monthly, the International Journal of Dermatology is specifically designed to provide dermatologists around the world with a regular, up-to-date source of information on all aspects of the diagnosis and management of skin diseases. Accepted articles regularly cover clinical trials; education; morphology; pharmacology and therapeutics; case reports, and reviews. Additional features include tropical medical reports, news, correspondence, proceedings and transactions, and education. The International Journal of Dermatology is guided by a distinguished, international editorial board and emphasizes a global approach to continuing medical education for physicians and other providers of health care with a specific interest in problems relating to the skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信