Spectrum and Impact of Reported Side Effects of Omalizumab in Patients With Chronic Urticaria: A Long-Term Multicentre Real-World Study

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Reineke Soegiharto, Esther Van der Wind, Mehran Alizadeh Aghdam, Jennifer A. Sørensen, Esmee Van Lindonk, Ferhan Bulut Demir, Nasser Mohammad Porras, Yoshimi Matsuo, Lea Kiefer, André C. Knulst, Marcus Maurer, Carla Ritchie, Michael Rudenko, Emek Kocatürk, Roberta Fachini Jardim Criado, Stamatis Gregoriou, Tatjana Bobylev, Andreas Kleinheinz, Shunsuke Takahagi, Michihiro Hide, Ana M. Giménez-Arnau, Andaç Salman, Rabia Oztas Kara, Bahar Sevimli Dikicier, Martijn B. A. Van Doorn, Simon F. Thomsen, Juul M. P. A. Van den Reek, Heike Röckmann
{"title":"Spectrum and Impact of Reported Side Effects of Omalizumab in Patients With Chronic Urticaria: A Long-Term Multicentre Real-World Study","authors":"Reineke Soegiharto,&nbsp;Esther Van der Wind,&nbsp;Mehran Alizadeh Aghdam,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Sørensen,&nbsp;Esmee Van Lindonk,&nbsp;Ferhan Bulut Demir,&nbsp;Nasser Mohammad Porras,&nbsp;Yoshimi Matsuo,&nbsp;Lea Kiefer,&nbsp;André C. Knulst,&nbsp;Marcus Maurer,&nbsp;Carla Ritchie,&nbsp;Michael Rudenko,&nbsp;Emek Kocatürk,&nbsp;Roberta Fachini Jardim Criado,&nbsp;Stamatis Gregoriou,&nbsp;Tatjana Bobylev,&nbsp;Andreas Kleinheinz,&nbsp;Shunsuke Takahagi,&nbsp;Michihiro Hide,&nbsp;Ana M. Giménez-Arnau,&nbsp;Andaç Salman,&nbsp;Rabia Oztas Kara,&nbsp;Bahar Sevimli Dikicier,&nbsp;Martijn B. A. Van Doorn,&nbsp;Simon F. Thomsen,&nbsp;Juul M. P. A. Van den Reek,&nbsp;Heike Röckmann","doi":"10.1111/cea.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Chronic urticaria (CU) treatment with omalizumab is considered safe in short-term studies. Large real-world studies focusing on the long-term safety of omalizumab and associated factors are lacking. We aimed to investigate the spectrum of reported side effects in omalizumab-treated CU patients in a large long-term daily practice cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multinational multicentre retrospective study was conducted at 14 specialised urticaria centres (UCAREs), including all CU patients ever treated with omalizumab until centre-specific data lock. The prevalence of patient-reported side effects was assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1859 patients were included, of which 32.9% (<i>n</i> = 612) reported side effects during omalizumab treatment with a wide range across centres (0%–75.5%). Fatigue (15.8%, <i>n</i> = 293), headache (11.6%, <i>n</i> = 215) and flu-like symptoms (9.3%, <i>n</i> = 172) were most common. No events suggestive of anaphylaxis and no new notably prevalent side effects were reported. Hair loss was reported by 2.9% (<i>n</i> = 53/1859) of patients, leading to treatment adjustment in 21.1% (<i>n</i> = 8/38 with sufficient data). Patients who reported side effects were more often female (78.3% vs. 68.6%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), had worse disease control prior to omalizumab (Urticaria Control Test, UCT, 4.0 vs. 6.0, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and lower fast response (Weekly Urticaria Activity Score, UAS7, &lt; 7 or UCT &gt; 11 within 4 weeks, 42.6% vs. 59.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and complete/good response rates (UAS7 &lt; 7 or UCT &gt; 11 at end of treatment, 72.3% vs. 84.4%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to patients without side effects. While only 2.4% (<i>n</i> = 44/1859) of patients discontinued treatment due to side effects, 5.5% (<i>n</i> = 100/1859) and 12.8% (<i>n</i> = 238/1859) of patients reporting side effects with insufficient (UAS7 ≥ 7 or UCT 3–11 at end of treatment) and complete/good response, respectively, remained on omalizumab.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The safety and tolerability of omalizumab was confirmed. Notably, the wide variation in reported side effects across centres suggests that differences in awareness influence reporting. Hair loss was more prevalent than described before, warranting extra attention. Side effects were more often reported in patients whose characteristics suggest reduced effectiveness of omalizumab, possibly related to a negative association with omalizumab and suggesting increased disease burden. Availability of new therapies might increase the impact of side effects on treatment decisions, not only in omalizumab-refractory patients but potentially even among good responders.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":"55 6","pages":"481-492"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cea.70067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.70067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chronic urticaria (CU) treatment with omalizumab is considered safe in short-term studies. Large real-world studies focusing on the long-term safety of omalizumab and associated factors are lacking. We aimed to investigate the spectrum of reported side effects in omalizumab-treated CU patients in a large long-term daily practice cohort.

Methods

A multinational multicentre retrospective study was conducted at 14 specialised urticaria centres (UCAREs), including all CU patients ever treated with omalizumab until centre-specific data lock. The prevalence of patient-reported side effects was assessed.

Results

A total of 1859 patients were included, of which 32.9% (n = 612) reported side effects during omalizumab treatment with a wide range across centres (0%–75.5%). Fatigue (15.8%, n = 293), headache (11.6%, n = 215) and flu-like symptoms (9.3%, n = 172) were most common. No events suggestive of anaphylaxis and no new notably prevalent side effects were reported. Hair loss was reported by 2.9% (n = 53/1859) of patients, leading to treatment adjustment in 21.1% (n = 8/38 with sufficient data). Patients who reported side effects were more often female (78.3% vs. 68.6%, p < 0.001), had worse disease control prior to omalizumab (Urticaria Control Test, UCT, 4.0 vs. 6.0, p < 0.001), and lower fast response (Weekly Urticaria Activity Score, UAS7, < 7 or UCT > 11 within 4 weeks, 42.6% vs. 59.5%, p < 0.001) and complete/good response rates (UAS7 < 7 or UCT > 11 at end of treatment, 72.3% vs. 84.4%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without side effects. While only 2.4% (n = 44/1859) of patients discontinued treatment due to side effects, 5.5% (n = 100/1859) and 12.8% (n = 238/1859) of patients reporting side effects with insufficient (UAS7 ≥ 7 or UCT 3–11 at end of treatment) and complete/good response, respectively, remained on omalizumab.

Conclusions

The safety and tolerability of omalizumab was confirmed. Notably, the wide variation in reported side effects across centres suggests that differences in awareness influence reporting. Hair loss was more prevalent than described before, warranting extra attention. Side effects were more often reported in patients whose characteristics suggest reduced effectiveness of omalizumab, possibly related to a negative association with omalizumab and suggesting increased disease burden. Availability of new therapies might increase the impact of side effects on treatment decisions, not only in omalizumab-refractory patients but potentially even among good responders.

Omalizumab在慢性荨麻疹患者中副作用的范围和影响:一项长期的多中心真实世界研究
背景:短期研究认为用omalizumab治疗慢性荨麻疹(CU)是安全的。目前缺乏针对omalizumab和相关因素的长期安全性的大型现实研究。我们的目的是在一个大型长期日常实践队列中调查奥玛珠单抗治疗的CU患者报告的副作用范围。方法:在14个专门的荨麻疹中心(UCAREs)进行了一项多国多中心回顾性研究,包括所有在中心特异性数据锁定之前接受过omalizumab治疗的CU患者。评估了患者报告的副作用的发生率。结果:共纳入1859例患者,其中32.9% (n = 612)报告了在omalizumab治疗期间的副作用,各中心范围广泛(0%-75.5%)。最常见的是疲劳(15.8%,n = 293)、头痛(11.6%,n = 215)和流感样症状(9.3%,n = 172)。没有提示过敏反应的事件,也没有新的明显流行的副作用报道。有2.9% (n = 53/1859)的患者出现脱发,21.1% (n = 8/38,数据充足)的患者出现治疗调整。报告副作用的患者多为女性(78.3% vs. 68.6%, 4周内p = 11, 42.6% vs. 59.5%,治疗结束时p = 11, 72.3% vs. 84.4%, p)结论:证实了omalizumab的安全性和耐受性。值得注意的是,各中心报告的副作用差异很大,这表明意识的差异影响了报告。脱发比之前描述的更普遍,需要额外的关注。副作用更常发生在那些特征表明奥玛单抗有效性降低的患者身上,这可能与奥玛单抗负相关,表明疾病负担增加。新疗法的可用性可能会增加副作用对治疗决策的影响,不仅在奥玛珠单抗难治性患者中,甚至在良好应答者中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信