Evaluating a customised large language model (DELSTAR) and its ability to address medication-related questions associated with delirium: a quantitative exploratory study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Katharina Teresa Spagl, Edward William Watson, Adam Jatowt, Anita Elaine Weidmann
{"title":"Evaluating a customised large language model (DELSTAR) and its ability to address medication-related questions associated with delirium: a quantitative exploratory study.","authors":"Katharina Teresa Spagl, Edward William Watson, Adam Jatowt, Anita Elaine Weidmann","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01900-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A customised large language model (LLM) could serve as a next-generation clinical pharmacy research assistant to prevent medication-associated delirium. Comprehensive evaluation strategies are still missing.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This quantitative exploratory study aimed to develop an approach to comprehensively assess the domain-specific customised delirium LLM (DELSTAR) ability, quality and performance to accurately address complex clinical and practice research questions on delirium that typically require extensive literature searches and meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>DELSTAR, focused on delirium-associated medications, was implemented as a 'Custom GPT' for quality assessment and as a Python-based software pipeline for performance testing on closed and leading open models. Quality metrics included statement accuracy and data credibility; performance metrics covered F1-Score, sensitivity/specificity, precision, AUC, and AUC-ROC curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DELSTAR demonstrated more accurate and comprehensive information compared to information retrieved by traditional systematic literature reviews (SLRs) (p < 0.05) and accessed Application Programmer Interfaces (API), private databases, and high-quality sources despite mainly relying on less reliable internet sources. GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o emerged as the most reliable foundation models. In Dataset 2, GPT-4o (F1-Score: 0.687) and Llama3-70b (F1-Score: 0.655) performed best, while in Dataset 3, GPT-3.5 (F1-Score: 0.708) and GPT-4o (F1-Score: 0.665) led. None consistently met desired threshold values across all metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DELSTAR demonstrated potential as a clinical pharmacy research assistant, surpassing traditional SLRs in quality. Improvements are needed in high-quality data use, citation, and performance optimisation. GPT-4o, GPT-3.5, and Llama3-70b were the most suitable foundation models, but fine-tuning DELSTAR is essential to enhance sensitivity, especially critical in pharmaceutical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01900-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A customised large language model (LLM) could serve as a next-generation clinical pharmacy research assistant to prevent medication-associated delirium. Comprehensive evaluation strategies are still missing.

Aim: This quantitative exploratory study aimed to develop an approach to comprehensively assess the domain-specific customised delirium LLM (DELSTAR) ability, quality and performance to accurately address complex clinical and practice research questions on delirium that typically require extensive literature searches and meta-analyses.

Method: DELSTAR, focused on delirium-associated medications, was implemented as a 'Custom GPT' for quality assessment and as a Python-based software pipeline for performance testing on closed and leading open models. Quality metrics included statement accuracy and data credibility; performance metrics covered F1-Score, sensitivity/specificity, precision, AUC, and AUC-ROC curves.

Results: DELSTAR demonstrated more accurate and comprehensive information compared to information retrieved by traditional systematic literature reviews (SLRs) (p < 0.05) and accessed Application Programmer Interfaces (API), private databases, and high-quality sources despite mainly relying on less reliable internet sources. GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o emerged as the most reliable foundation models. In Dataset 2, GPT-4o (F1-Score: 0.687) and Llama3-70b (F1-Score: 0.655) performed best, while in Dataset 3, GPT-3.5 (F1-Score: 0.708) and GPT-4o (F1-Score: 0.665) led. None consistently met desired threshold values across all metrics.

Conclusion: DELSTAR demonstrated potential as a clinical pharmacy research assistant, surpassing traditional SLRs in quality. Improvements are needed in high-quality data use, citation, and performance optimisation. GPT-4o, GPT-3.5, and Llama3-70b were the most suitable foundation models, but fine-tuning DELSTAR is essential to enhance sensitivity, especially critical in pharmaceutical contexts.

评估定制大语言模型(DELSTAR)及其解决与谵妄相关的药物相关问题的能力:一项定量探索性研究。
背景:定制大语言模型(LLM)可作为下一代临床药学研究助手,用于预防药物相关性谵妄。综合评价策略仍然缺失。目的:本定量探索性研究旨在开发一种方法来全面评估特定领域定制谵妄LLM (DELSTAR)的能力、质量和性能,以准确解决谵妄的复杂临床和实践研究问题,这些问题通常需要广泛的文献检索和荟萃分析。方法:DELSTAR,专注于谵妄相关药物,作为质量评估的“定制GPT”和基于python的软件管道,在封闭和领先的开放模型上进行性能测试。质量指标包括陈述的准确性和数据的可信度;性能指标包括F1-Score、敏感性/特异性、精密度、AUC和AUC- roc曲线。结果:与传统的系统文献综述(SLRs)检索的信息相比,DELSTAR显示出更准确和全面的信息(p)。结论:DELSTAR在质量上优于传统的系统文献综述,具有作为临床药学研究助手的潜力。需要在高质量数据使用、引用和性能优化方面进行改进。gpt - 40、GPT-3.5和Llama3-70b是最合适的基础模型,但对DELSTAR进行微调对于提高灵敏度至关重要,尤其是在制药领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信