Factors influencing the choice of lumbar epidural analgesia and its association with postpartum depression risk.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002180
Sana Asif, Natasa Kollia, Andrea Kollmann, Birgitta Birgisdottir, Richard Aubrey White, Miklós Lipcsey, Alkistis Skalkidou
{"title":"Factors influencing the choice of lumbar epidural analgesia and its association with postpartum depression risk.","authors":"Sana Asif, Natasa Kollia, Andrea Kollmann, Birgitta Birgisdottir, Richard Aubrey White, Miklós Lipcsey, Alkistis Skalkidou","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) during childbirth varies significantly among women. Factors influencing a woman's choice of LEA and its possible effects on postpartum depression (PPD) remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate factors influencing the choice of LEA among women with intended vaginal deliveries. A secondary objective was to explore the association between LEA use and PPD.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A longitudinal cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, 2010 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Women with an intended vaginal delivery.</p><p><strong>Exclusions: </strong>Twins, elective caesarean section, induction of labour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected by web-based self-completed questionnaires at gestational weeks 17, 32 and at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. The exposures were sociodemographic, resilience-related, medical and obstetric characteristics of all participants from the BASIC (Biology, Affect, Stress, Imaging and Cognition) study. Information on the use of LEA was retrieved from medical records. PPD was assessed using either the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, or the Depression Self-Rating Scale, and/or the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview at 6 to 8 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Bayesian models were applied to investigate the associations of multivariate factors with the choice for LEA, and the association between the use of LEA and PPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4436 participants, 38% opted for LEA, while 62% did not. LEA users were younger, primiparous, reported higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) and had lower resilience. The adjusted model revealed primiparity, previous caesarean section, IPV, pregnancy length at least 280 days and fear of childbirth as independent predictors of LEA use. While LEA use was associated with higher odds of PPD in the crude regression model, it was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for possible confounders and mediators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social and psychological vulnerabilities influence a woman's decision to opt for LEA during childbirth. LEA was not associated with PPD in adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This is a longitudinal study which was not registered in 2010.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"626-636"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) during childbirth varies significantly among women. Factors influencing a woman's choice of LEA and its possible effects on postpartum depression (PPD) remain underexplored.

Objectives: To investigate factors influencing the choice of LEA among women with intended vaginal deliveries. A secondary objective was to explore the association between LEA use and PPD.

Study design: A longitudinal cohort study.

Setting: Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, 2010 to 2019.

Population: Women with an intended vaginal delivery.

Exclusions: Twins, elective caesarean section, induction of labour.

Methods: Data were collected by web-based self-completed questionnaires at gestational weeks 17, 32 and at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. The exposures were sociodemographic, resilience-related, medical and obstetric characteristics of all participants from the BASIC (Biology, Affect, Stress, Imaging and Cognition) study. Information on the use of LEA was retrieved from medical records. PPD was assessed using either the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, or the Depression Self-Rating Scale, and/or the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview at 6 to 8 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Bayesian models were applied to investigate the associations of multivariate factors with the choice for LEA, and the association between the use of LEA and PPD.

Results: Among 4436 participants, 38% opted for LEA, while 62% did not. LEA users were younger, primiparous, reported higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) and had lower resilience. The adjusted model revealed primiparity, previous caesarean section, IPV, pregnancy length at least 280 days and fear of childbirth as independent predictors of LEA use. While LEA use was associated with higher odds of PPD in the crude regression model, it was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for possible confounders and mediators.

Conclusion: Social and psychological vulnerabilities influence a woman's decision to opt for LEA during childbirth. LEA was not associated with PPD in adjusted models.

Trial registration: This is a longitudinal study which was not registered in 2010.

影响腰椎硬膜外镇痛选择的因素及其与产后抑郁风险的关系。
背景:妇女分娩时腰硬膜外镇痛(LEA)的使用差异很大。影响女性选择LEA的因素及其对产后抑郁症(PPD)的可能影响尚不清楚。目的:探讨影响阴道分娩妇女选择LEA的因素。第二个目的是探讨LEA使用与PPD之间的关系。研究设计:纵向队列研究。地点:瑞典乌普萨拉大学医院,2010年至2019年。人群:计划阴道分娩的女性。排除:双胞胎,择期剖腹产,引产。方法:于妊娠17周、32周、产后6周、6个月采用网络自填问卷收集数据。暴露是来自BASIC(生物学、情感、压力、成像和认知)研究的所有参与者的社会人口学、复原力相关、医学和产科特征。从医疗记录中检索了关于LEA使用情况的信息。在产后6 - 8周和6个月,使用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表或抑郁自评量表和/或迷你国际神经精神病学访谈对产后抑郁进行评估。应用贝叶斯模型探讨多因素与LEA选择的关系,以及LEA使用与PPD之间的关系。结果:4436名参与者中,38%的人选择LEA, 62%的人不选择LEA。LEA使用者较年轻,初产,报告的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)率较高,适应能力较低。调整后的模型显示,初产、既往剖腹产、IPV、怀孕时间至少280天和害怕分娩是LEA使用的独立预测因素。虽然在粗糙的回归模型中,LEA的使用与PPD的高几率相关,但在调整了可能的混杂因素和中介因素后,它不再具有统计学意义。结论:社会和心理脆弱性影响妇女在分娩时选择LEA的决定。在调整后的模型中,LEA与PPD无关。试验注册:这是一项纵向研究,在2010年没有注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信