Comparison of programmed death ligand-1 expression in preoperative transbronchial lung biopsy and resected specimens in non-small cell lung cancer.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Naoko Shigeta, Shuji Murakami, Kouji Yamamoto, Tomoyuki Yokose, Tetsuya Isaka, Kota Washimi, Yohei Miyagi, Haruhiro Saito, Hiroyuki Ito, Aya Saito
{"title":"Comparison of programmed death ligand-1 expression in preoperative transbronchial lung biopsy and resected specimens in non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Naoko Shigeta, Shuji Murakami, Kouji Yamamoto, Tomoyuki Yokose, Tetsuya Isaka, Kota Washimi, Yohei Miyagi, Haruhiro Saito, Hiroyuki Ito, Aya Saito","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06189-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Programmed death-ligand 1 expression is heterogeneous in non-small cell lung cancer, and small specimens may not accurately represent the entire tumor. The current study investigated the discordance in programmed death-ligand 1 expression between preoperative biopsy samples and resected specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection from May 2022 to June 2024. The programmed death-ligand 1-positive tumor proportion score was evaluated for each case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 118 patients were included in this study. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was discordant between the biopsy and resected specimens in 34 cases (28.8%), and it was underestimated in 25 (21.2%) biopsy specimens. The concordance according to Cohen's kappa was κ = 0.410 (95% confidence interval: 0.243-0.577). The number of discordant cases decreased as the number of tumor cells in biopsy specimens increased. In the group with > 400 tumor cells, agreement rate was 100%. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model identified never smoker, small tumor size, clinical stage II-IV and ≤ 200 tumor cells in biopsy specimens as predictors of underestimation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using those four factors was 0.773 (0.663-0.884).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in biopsy and resected specimens is often discordant, often being underestimated in biopsy specimens. Discordance is more likely when tumor cell counts are low in the biopsy samples. Therefore, caution is advised when treatment decisions are made based on programmed death-ligand 1 assessments of small specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 4","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06189-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Programmed death-ligand 1 expression is heterogeneous in non-small cell lung cancer, and small specimens may not accurately represent the entire tumor. The current study investigated the discordance in programmed death-ligand 1 expression between preoperative biopsy samples and resected specimens.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection from May 2022 to June 2024. The programmed death-ligand 1-positive tumor proportion score was evaluated for each case.

Results: In total, 118 patients were included in this study. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was discordant between the biopsy and resected specimens in 34 cases (28.8%), and it was underestimated in 25 (21.2%) biopsy specimens. The concordance according to Cohen's kappa was κ = 0.410 (95% confidence interval: 0.243-0.577). The number of discordant cases decreased as the number of tumor cells in biopsy specimens increased. In the group with > 400 tumor cells, agreement rate was 100%. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model identified never smoker, small tumor size, clinical stage II-IV and ≤ 200 tumor cells in biopsy specimens as predictors of underestimation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using those four factors was 0.773 (0.663-0.884).

Conclusions: Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in biopsy and resected specimens is often discordant, often being underestimated in biopsy specimens. Discordance is more likely when tumor cell counts are low in the biopsy samples. Therefore, caution is advised when treatment decisions are made based on programmed death-ligand 1 assessments of small specimens.

非小细胞肺癌术前经支气管肺活检与切除标本中程序性死亡配体-1表达的比较
目的:程序性死亡配体1在非小细胞肺癌中的表达是不均匀的,小样本可能不能准确地代表整个肿瘤。目前的研究调查了术前活检样本和切除标本之间程序性死亡配体1表达的不一致性。方法:回顾性收集2022年5月至2024年6月行手术切除的非小细胞肺癌患者资料。对每个病例进行程序性死亡-配体1阳性肿瘤比例评分。结果:本研究共纳入118例患者。34例(28.8%)活检标本与切除标本的程序性死亡配体1表达不一致,25例(21.2%)活检标本的程序性死亡配体1表达被低估。Cohen’s kappa的一致性为κ = 0.410(95%置信区间:0.243 ~ 0.577)。不一致病例的数量随着活检标本中肿瘤细胞数量的增加而减少。肿瘤细胞数为4400个的组,符合率为100%。最小绝对收缩和选择算子模型确定从不吸烟、肿瘤大小小、临床分期II-IV和活检标本中≤200个肿瘤细胞作为低估的预测因子。4个因素作用下的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.773(0.663 ~ 0.884)。结论:程序性死亡配体1在活检标本和切除标本中的表达往往不一致,在活检标本中往往被低估。当活检样本中肿瘤细胞计数较低时,不一致更有可能发生。因此,在根据小样本的程序性死亡配体1评估作出治疗决定时,建议谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信