Accurate and fully automated diameter measurements of Circle of Willis arteries on MRA imaging.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Julia Huck, Davy Vanderweyen, Tatjana Rundek, Mitchell Sv Elkind, Jose Gutierrez, Maxime Descoteaux, Kevin Whittingstall
{"title":"Accurate and fully automated diameter measurements of Circle of Willis arteries on MRA imaging.","authors":"Julia Huck, Davy Vanderweyen, Tatjana Rundek, Mitchell Sv Elkind, Jose Gutierrez, Maxime Descoteaux, Kevin Whittingstall","doi":"10.1177/0271678X251338972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Circle of Willis (CW), visualized via Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA), is crucial for assessing cerebral circulation. Accurate artery identification is essential not only for detecting stenosis and pathological changes but also for understanding vascular adaptations in healthy aging. Manual CW assessment is time-consuming, necessitating automated alternatives. This study evaluates intracranial artery diameter estimations from the Express IntraCranial Arteries Breakdown (eICAB) toolbox against manual measurements. eICAB was tested on 631 participants from the Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS) with 1.5T MRA images (0.293 × 0.293 × 1 mm resolution). We analyzed eICAB's detection and diameter estimation accuracy of the Internal Carotid (ICA), Basilar (BA), Anterior Cerebral (ACA), Middle Cerebral (MCA), Posterior Cerebral (PCA), and Posterior Communicating (PCom). eICAB showed over 95% accuracy in detecting major arteries except for PCA and PCom (∼80%). Diameter discrepancies were generally ≤0.5 mm, with ICA and BA reaching 1 mm. Spearman correlation (p ≪ 0.05) confirmed strong agreement between automated and manual measurements. Resampling at 0.2083 mm improved precision. eICAB accurately identifies CW arteries and estimates diameters, demonstrating strong clinical and research potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"271678X251338972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X251338972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Circle of Willis (CW), visualized via Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA), is crucial for assessing cerebral circulation. Accurate artery identification is essential not only for detecting stenosis and pathological changes but also for understanding vascular adaptations in healthy aging. Manual CW assessment is time-consuming, necessitating automated alternatives. This study evaluates intracranial artery diameter estimations from the Express IntraCranial Arteries Breakdown (eICAB) toolbox against manual measurements. eICAB was tested on 631 participants from the Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS) with 1.5T MRA images (0.293 × 0.293 × 1 mm resolution). We analyzed eICAB's detection and diameter estimation accuracy of the Internal Carotid (ICA), Basilar (BA), Anterior Cerebral (ACA), Middle Cerebral (MCA), Posterior Cerebral (PCA), and Posterior Communicating (PCom). eICAB showed over 95% accuracy in detecting major arteries except for PCA and PCom (∼80%). Diameter discrepancies were generally ≤0.5 mm, with ICA and BA reaching 1 mm. Spearman correlation (p ≪ 0.05) confirmed strong agreement between automated and manual measurements. Resampling at 0.2083 mm improved precision. eICAB accurately identifies CW arteries and estimates diameters, demonstrating strong clinical and research potential.

在MRA成像上精确全自动测量Willis动脉圈直径。
通过磁共振血管造影(MRA)显示的威利斯圈(CW)对评估脑循环至关重要。准确的动脉识别不仅对发现狭窄和病理变化至关重要,而且对了解健康衰老过程中的血管适应也至关重要。手动CW评估是耗时的,需要自动化的替代方案。本研究评估颅内动脉直径估计从快速颅内动脉破裂(eICAB)工具箱与手动测量。对来自北曼哈顿研究(NOMAS)的631名参与者使用1.5T MRA图像(0.293 × 0.293 × 1 mm分辨率)进行eICAB测试。我们分析了eICAB对颈内动脉(ICA)、基底动脉(BA)、大脑前部(ACA)、大脑中部(MCA)、大脑后部(PCA)和后交通线(PCom)的检测和直径估计的准确性。除PCA和PCom外,eICAB检测大动脉的准确率超过95%(~ 80%)。直径差一般≤0.5 mm, ICA和BA达1 mm。Spearman相关性(p≪0.05)证实了自动测量和手动测量之间的高度一致。在0.2083 mm处重新采样提高了精度。eICAB能准确识别连续动脉并估计动脉直径,显示出强大的临床和研究潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信