Deep learning enhances reliability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in diffuse gliomas: bypassing post-processing and providing uncertainty maps.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11588-z
Young Wook Lyoo, Haneol Lee, Junhyeok Lee, Jung Hyun Park, Inpyeong Hwang, Jin Wook Chung, Seung Hong Choi, Jaejun Yoo, Kyu Sung Choi
{"title":"Deep learning enhances reliability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in diffuse gliomas: bypassing post-processing and providing uncertainty maps.","authors":"Young Wook Lyoo, Haneol Lee, Junhyeok Lee, Jung Hyun Park, Inpyeong Hwang, Jin Wook Chung, Seung Hong Choi, Jaejun Yoo, Kyu Sung Choi","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11588-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To propose and evaluate a novel deep learning model for directly estimating pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter maps and uncertainty estimation from DCE-MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center study, patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI from Apr 2010 to Feb 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. A spatiotemporal probabilistic model was used to create synthetic PK maps. Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) to ground truth (GT) maps were calculated. Reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for synthetic and GT PK maps. For clinical validation, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) was obtained for predicting WHO low vs high grade and IDH-wildtype vs mutant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>329 patients (mean age, 55 ± 15 years, 197 men) were eligible. Synthetic K<sup>trans</sup>, Vp, Ve maps showed high SSIM (0.961, 0.962, 0.890) compared to the GT maps. The ICC of PK maps was significantly higher in synthetic PK maps compared to the conventional approach: 1.00 vs 0.68 (p < 0.001) for K<sup>trans</sup>, 1.00 vs 0.59 (p < 0.001) for Vp, 1.00 vs 0.64 (p < 0.001) for Ve. PK values of enhancing tumor portion obtained from synthetic and GT maps were comparable in AUROC: (1) K<sup>trans</sup>, 0.857 vs 0.842 (p = 0.57); Vp, 0.864 vs 0.835 (p = 0.31); and Ve, 0.835 vs 0.830 (p = 0.88) for mutation prediction. (2) K<sup>trans</sup>, 0.934 vs 0.907 (p = 0.50); Vp, 0.927 vs 0.899 (p = 0.24); and Ve, 0.945 vs 0.910 (p = 0.24) for glioma grading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Synthetic PK maps generated from DCE-MRI using a spatiotemporal probabilistic deep-learning model showed improved reliability without compromising diagnostic performance in glioma grading.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Can a deep learning model enhance the reliability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for more consistent and clinically acceptable glioma imaging? Findings A spatiotemporal deep learning model outperformed the Tofts model in Ktrans reliability and preserved diagnostic performance for IDH mutation and glioma grade, bypassing arterial input function estimation. Clinical relevance Enhancing DCE-MRI reliability with deep learning improves imaging consistency, supports molecular tumor characterization through reproducible pharmacokinetic maps, and enables personalized treatment planning, which might lead to better clinical outcomes for patients with diffuse gliomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"6229-6239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11588-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To propose and evaluate a novel deep learning model for directly estimating pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter maps and uncertainty estimation from DCE-MRI.

Methods: In this single-center study, patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI from Apr 2010 to Feb 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. A spatiotemporal probabilistic model was used to create synthetic PK maps. Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) to ground truth (GT) maps were calculated. Reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for synthetic and GT PK maps. For clinical validation, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) was obtained for predicting WHO low vs high grade and IDH-wildtype vs mutant.

Results: 329 patients (mean age, 55 ± 15 years, 197 men) were eligible. Synthetic Ktrans, Vp, Ve maps showed high SSIM (0.961, 0.962, 0.890) compared to the GT maps. The ICC of PK maps was significantly higher in synthetic PK maps compared to the conventional approach: 1.00 vs 0.68 (p < 0.001) for Ktrans, 1.00 vs 0.59 (p < 0.001) for Vp, 1.00 vs 0.64 (p < 0.001) for Ve. PK values of enhancing tumor portion obtained from synthetic and GT maps were comparable in AUROC: (1) Ktrans, 0.857 vs 0.842 (p = 0.57); Vp, 0.864 vs 0.835 (p = 0.31); and Ve, 0.835 vs 0.830 (p = 0.88) for mutation prediction. (2) Ktrans, 0.934 vs 0.907 (p = 0.50); Vp, 0.927 vs 0.899 (p = 0.24); and Ve, 0.945 vs 0.910 (p = 0.24) for glioma grading.

Conclusion: Synthetic PK maps generated from DCE-MRI using a spatiotemporal probabilistic deep-learning model showed improved reliability without compromising diagnostic performance in glioma grading.

Key points: Question Can a deep learning model enhance the reliability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for more consistent and clinically acceptable glioma imaging? Findings A spatiotemporal deep learning model outperformed the Tofts model in Ktrans reliability and preserved diagnostic performance for IDH mutation and glioma grade, bypassing arterial input function estimation. Clinical relevance Enhancing DCE-MRI reliability with deep learning improves imaging consistency, supports molecular tumor characterization through reproducible pharmacokinetic maps, and enables personalized treatment planning, which might lead to better clinical outcomes for patients with diffuse gliomas.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

深度学习提高了弥漫性胶质瘤动态对比增强MRI的可靠性:绕过后处理并提供不确定性图。
目的:提出并评估一种新的深度学习模型,用于直接估计DCE-MRI的药代动力学(PK)参数图和不确定性估计。方法:在这项单中心研究中,回顾性纳入了2010年4月至2020年2月术前接受DCE-MRI检查的成人型弥漫性胶质瘤患者。采用时空概率模型构建合成PK图。计算了结构相似指数测量(SSIM)到地面真值(GT)图。采用类内相关系数(ICC)对合成PK图和GT PK图进行可靠性评估。为了临床验证,获得了受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC),用于预测WHO低分级与高分级以及idh野生型与突变型。结果:329例患者(平均年龄55±15岁,男性197例)入选。合成Ktrans、Vp、Ve图谱与GT图谱相比具有较高的SSIM(0.961、0.962、0.890)。合成PK图的ICC值显著高于常规PK图:1.00 vs 0.68 (p trans), 1.00 vs 0.59 (p trans), 0.857 vs 0.842 (p = 0.57);Vp, 0.864 vs 0.835 (p = 0.31);突变预测值为0.835 vs 0.830 (p = 0.88)。(2) Ktrans, 0.934 vs 0.907 (p = 0.50);Vp, 0.927 vs 0.899 (p = 0.24);胶质瘤分级的Ve为0.945 vs 0.910 (p = 0.24)。结论:使用时空概率深度学习模型从DCE-MRI生成的合成PK图在不影响胶质瘤分级诊断性能的情况下提高了可靠性。深度学习模型能否提高动态对比增强MRI (DCE-MRI)的可靠性,使胶质瘤成像更加一致和临床可接受?时空深度学习模型在Ktrans可靠性和保留IDH突变和胶质瘤分级的诊断性能方面优于Tofts模型,绕过了动脉输入函数估计。通过深度学习增强DCE-MRI的可靠性可以提高成像一致性,通过可重复的药代动力学图支持分子肿瘤表征,并实现个性化治疗计划,这可能会为弥漫性胶质瘤患者带来更好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信