Analysis on the clinical correlation of lens parameters and choroidal thickness with the severity of primary angle closure disease.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Vijayalakshmi A Senthilkumar, Sayali Borikar, Niyati Pankaj Gandhi, Iswarya Mani, Sharmila Rajendrababu
{"title":"Analysis on the clinical correlation of lens parameters and choroidal thickness with the severity of primary angle closure disease.","authors":"Vijayalakshmi A Senthilkumar, Sayali Borikar, Niyati Pankaj Gandhi, Iswarya Mani, Sharmila Rajendrababu","doi":"10.1177/11206721251340230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation of lens parameters and choroidal thickness (RCS) with the severity of PACD and to compare those parameters with the normal population. <b>Methods:</b> Prospective, cross-sectional hospital-based study. A total of 286 subjects (572 eyes) including 236 study patients (472 eyes) and 50 age-matched controls (100 eyes) were included in the study. The parameters studied were anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), anterior vault (AV), lens axial factor (LAF), lens position (LP), relative lens position (RLP), lens vault (LV) and RCS thickness. <b>Results:</b> The mean ACD was significantly shallow in all subtypes of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG) (mean ± <i>SD</i> = 2.53 ± 0.34 mm) compared to controls (4.05 ± 0.16; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Likewise, the mean lens thickness was more in all subtypes of PACD (mean ± <i>SD</i> = 4.67 ± 0.26 mm) than in normal controls (4.17 ± 0.17 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Moreover, PACD patients had higher LV (mean ± <i>SD</i> = 1174.29 ± 247.87) than in controls (778.23 ± 37.95; <i>p</i> = 0.0001), particularly in eyes with <b>AAC</b> (1328.86 ± 77.13). Other biometric parameters like AV, LAF, LP, RLP and RCS thickness revealed a statistically significant difference in PACD compared to the control population (<i>p</i> < 0.00001). Pairwise comparison also revealed significant difference in all ocular biometric parameters in <b>AAC</b> compared to other subtypes. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lens parameters and choroidal thickness correlated significantly with the severity of PACD. Our study highlights the interplay of multiple ocular biometric parameters with the disease severity, suggesting the individualised surgical options in patients with PACD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721251340230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251340230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation of lens parameters and choroidal thickness (RCS) with the severity of PACD and to compare those parameters with the normal population. Methods: Prospective, cross-sectional hospital-based study. A total of 286 subjects (572 eyes) including 236 study patients (472 eyes) and 50 age-matched controls (100 eyes) were included in the study. The parameters studied were anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), anterior vault (AV), lens axial factor (LAF), lens position (LP), relative lens position (RLP), lens vault (LV) and RCS thickness. Results: The mean ACD was significantly shallow in all subtypes of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG) (mean ± SD = 2.53 ± 0.34 mm) compared to controls (4.05 ± 0.16; p = 0.0001). Likewise, the mean lens thickness was more in all subtypes of PACD (mean ± SD = 4.67 ± 0.26 mm) than in normal controls (4.17 ± 0.17 mm; p = 0.0001). Moreover, PACD patients had higher LV (mean ± SD = 1174.29 ± 247.87) than in controls (778.23 ± 37.95; p = 0.0001), particularly in eyes with AAC (1328.86 ± 77.13). Other biometric parameters like AV, LAF, LP, RLP and RCS thickness revealed a statistically significant difference in PACD compared to the control population (p < 0.00001). Pairwise comparison also revealed significant difference in all ocular biometric parameters in AAC compared to other subtypes. Conclusion: Lens parameters and choroidal thickness correlated significantly with the severity of PACD. Our study highlights the interplay of multiple ocular biometric parameters with the disease severity, suggesting the individualised surgical options in patients with PACD.

晶状体参数、脉络膜厚度与原发性闭角症严重程度的临床相关性分析。
目的:探讨晶状体参数和脉络膜厚度(RCS)与PACD严重程度的相关性,并与正常人群进行比较。方法:以医院为基础的前瞻性横断面研究。研究共纳入286名受试者(572只眼),其中236名研究患者(472只眼)和50名年龄匹配的对照组(100只眼)。研究参数为前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、前穹窿(AV)、晶状体轴向因子(LAF)、晶状体位置(LP)、晶状体相对位置(RLP)、晶状体穹窿(LV)和RCS厚度。结果:原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)各亚型患者的平均ACD均较浅(平均±SD = 2.53±0.34 mm),对照组为4.05±0.16;p = 0.0001)。同样,所有亚型PACD的平均晶状体厚度(平均±SD = 4.67±0.26 mm)均大于正常对照组(4.17±0.17 mm);p = 0.0001)。此外,PACD患者的LV(平均±SD = 1174.29±247.87)高于对照组(778.23±37.95;p = 0.0001),尤其是AAC眼(1328.86±77.13)。其他生物特征参数如AV、LAF、LP、RLP和RCS厚度显示PACD与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(p AAC与其他亚型相比)。结论:晶状体参数和脉络膜厚度与PACD的严重程度相关。我们的研究强调了多种眼部生物特征参数与疾病严重程度的相互作用,提示PACD患者的个体化手术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信