Samuel Chillavert Dias Pascoal, Maria Clara Ayres Estellita, Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa, Juliano Sartori Mendonça
{"title":"Effect of mussel-inspired primers on resin–dentin bonding interface stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Samuel Chillavert Dias Pascoal, Maria Clara Ayres Estellita, Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa, Juliano Sartori Mendonça","doi":"10.1111/eos.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of mussel-inspired primers on resin-dentin bond stability. This review was registered on the OSF platform (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QC7VU) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Databases included PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, LIVIVO, and gray literature. Eligibility criteria included in vitro studies using human dentin, which assessed bond strength through microtensile tests after applying mussel-inspired primers. Exclusion criteria were studies evaluating bond strength to enamel, animal dentin, and ceramics, those not using the microtensile test, or those conducting immediate evaluation only. The RoBDEMAT tool was used for risk-of-bias analysis. Two independent reviewers screened 5522 articles, and seven were selected. The studies showed a similar risk of bias performance, with insufficient reporting of different parameters, while not presenting significant publication bias. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher bond strength in specimens treated with mussel-inspired monomers after thermocycling. Across studies, no substantial reduction in heterogeneity was observed using the leave-one-out method. Mussel-inspired monomers incorporated into the dentin adhesive procedure can enhance bond strength, mainly through their catecholic groups, highlighting their potential in adhesive dentistry. However, drawbacks such as oxidative potential and effects on the degree of conversion may limit their widespread application.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"133 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eos.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of mussel-inspired primers on resin-dentin bond stability. This review was registered on the OSF platform (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QC7VU) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Databases included PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, LIVIVO, and gray literature. Eligibility criteria included in vitro studies using human dentin, which assessed bond strength through microtensile tests after applying mussel-inspired primers. Exclusion criteria were studies evaluating bond strength to enamel, animal dentin, and ceramics, those not using the microtensile test, or those conducting immediate evaluation only. The RoBDEMAT tool was used for risk-of-bias analysis. Two independent reviewers screened 5522 articles, and seven were selected. The studies showed a similar risk of bias performance, with insufficient reporting of different parameters, while not presenting significant publication bias. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher bond strength in specimens treated with mussel-inspired monomers after thermocycling. Across studies, no substantial reduction in heterogeneity was observed using the leave-one-out method. Mussel-inspired monomers incorporated into the dentin adhesive procedure can enhance bond strength, mainly through their catecholic groups, highlighting their potential in adhesive dentistry. However, drawbacks such as oxidative potential and effects on the degree of conversion may limit their widespread application.
本文介绍了贻贝启发的引物对树脂-牙本质键稳定性的功效的系统回顾和荟萃分析的结果。该审查已在OSF平台(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QC7VU)上注册,并遵循PRISMA指南。数据库包括PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, LIVIVO和灰色文献。资格标准包括使用人牙本质的体外研究,在应用贻贝启发的引物后,通过微拉伸测试评估结合强度。排除标准是评估与牙釉质、动物牙本质和陶瓷的结合强度的研究,不使用微拉伸试验的研究,或仅进行即时评估的研究。使用RoBDEMAT工具进行偏倚风险分析。2位独立审稿人筛选了5522篇文章,最终入选7篇。这些研究显示了相似的偏倚风险,不同参数的报道不足,但没有出现显著的发表偏倚。荟萃分析显示,在热循环后,用贻贝激发单体处理的标本的结合强度显着提高。在所有研究中,使用“留一法”没有观察到异质性的实质性减少。以贻贝为灵感的单体结合到牙本质粘合过程中,可以增强粘合强度,主要是通过它们的天主教基团,突出了它们在粘合牙科方面的潜力。然而,氧化电位和对转化程度的影响等缺点可能限制了它们的广泛应用。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication.
The journal is published bimonthly.