Sentinel lymph node biopsy mapped with carbon nanoparticle suspensions in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ting Qu, Guangfu Zeng, Jinmei Yang, Kexin Tang, Ping Xie, Xiaohai Tang
{"title":"Sentinel lymph node biopsy mapped with carbon nanoparticle suspensions in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ting Qu, Guangfu Zeng, Jinmei Yang, Kexin Tang, Ping Xie, Xiaohai Tang","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mapping technique significantly influences the detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes in cervical cancer. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of carbon nanoparticle suspensions (CNSs) in guiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for cervical cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic search of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cqvip, Wanfang, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception until June 2024. Studies on cervical cancer patients receiving SLNB with CNSs are included. An individual participant data meta-analysis was conducted. The protocol was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42024569290).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 26 publications involving 1671 patients were analyzed. The overall detection rate of CNSs in SLNB for cervical cancer was 0.92, with bilateral and unilateral detection rates of 0.74 and 0.20, respectively. This detection rate exhibited a correlation with lesion size and the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96, I2 = 35.89%), 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00, I2 = 90.01%), 216.84 (95% CI: 40.47-1161.85, I2 = 77.68%), and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05-0.12, I2 = 54.96%), respectively. The area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97. No significant differences were found in subgroup analyses based on the method, time, and dose of CNS injection. However, significant publication bias was detected among the included studies based on Deeks' funnel plot [Slope (Bias) = -15.61, P = .001]. Nonetheless, sensitivity analysis confirmed the reliability and stability of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis highlights the accuracy and feasibility of using CNSs for SLNB in patients with cervical cancer, particularly for lesions <2.0 cm and patients untreated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The mapping technique significantly influences the detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes in cervical cancer. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of carbon nanoparticle suspensions (CNSs) in guiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for cervical cancer patients.

Methods: Systematic search of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cqvip, Wanfang, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception until June 2024. Studies on cervical cancer patients receiving SLNB with CNSs are included. An individual participant data meta-analysis was conducted. The protocol was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42024569290).

Results: In total, 26 publications involving 1671 patients were analyzed. The overall detection rate of CNSs in SLNB for cervical cancer was 0.92, with bilateral and unilateral detection rates of 0.74 and 0.20, respectively. This detection rate exhibited a correlation with lesion size and the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96, I2 = 35.89%), 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00, I2 = 90.01%), 216.84 (95% CI: 40.47-1161.85, I2 = 77.68%), and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05-0.12, I2 = 54.96%), respectively. The area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97. No significant differences were found in subgroup analyses based on the method, time, and dose of CNS injection. However, significant publication bias was detected among the included studies based on Deeks' funnel plot [Slope (Bias) = -15.61, P = .001]. Nonetheless, sensitivity analysis confirmed the reliability and stability of the results.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis highlights the accuracy and feasibility of using CNSs for SLNB in patients with cervical cancer, particularly for lesions <2.0 cm and patients untreated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

用纳米碳悬浮液对宫颈癌患者进行前哨淋巴结活检:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:定位技术对宫颈癌前哨淋巴结的检出率有显著影响。本研究旨在评价纳米碳悬浮液(CNSs)指导宫颈癌前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的临床疗效。方法:系统检索中国国家知识基础设施、Cqvip、万方、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library自建站至2024年6月的数据库。包括宫颈癌SLNB合并CNSs患者的研究。对个体参与者数据进行meta分析。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO: CRD42024569290)上前瞻性注册。结果:共分析26篇文献,涉及1671例患者。SLNB中CNSs对宫颈癌的总检出率为0.92,其中双侧检出率为0.74,单侧检出率为0.20。这一检出率与病变大小和新辅助化疗的使用有关。合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96, I2 = 35.89%)、1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00, I2 = 90.01%)、216.84 (95% CI: 40.47-1161.85, I2 = 77.68%)和0.07 (95% CI: 0.05-0.12, I2 = 54.96%)。综合受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.97。注射CNS的方法、时间和剂量在亚组分析中无显著差异。然而,根据Deeks漏斗图,在纳入的研究中发现了显著的发表偏倚[Slope (bias) = -15.61, P = .001]。尽管如此,敏感性分析证实了结果的可靠性和稳定性。结论:该荟萃分析强调了在宫颈癌患者,特别是病变患者中使用CNSs进行SLNB的准确性和可行性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信