"Dysphoria? Don't Know Them": Applying the Health Belief Model in a Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Masculinizing Top Surgery-Related Content on TikTok.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Elizabeth Cavic, Allegra Cullen, Ginette Sims, Aaron S Breslow
{"title":"\"Dysphoria? Don't Know Them\": Applying the Health Belief Model in a Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Masculinizing Top Surgery-Related Content on TikTok.","authors":"Elizabeth Cavic, Allegra Cullen, Ginette Sims, Aaron S Breslow","doi":"10.1177/15248399251331948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media has become an important vehicle for digital health-related communication in recent decades. TikTok-a short form video-sharing application-contains many videos pertaining to masculinizing top surgery (MTS). In line with the health belief model, TikTok content may impact patients' health behaviors by acting on key health belief constructs. However, little is known about what specific content is generated regarding MTS on TikTok. To capture this information, our team utilized a reflexive thematic analysis to systematically describe MTS-related TikTok content on a sample of 250 videos created by 158 unique accounts. We found that our sample received a total of 79.9 million views, 11.9 million likes, 130.9 thousand comments, 581.8 thousand saves, and 176.7 thousand shares. The top five most popular content topics (defined as any topic mentioned within the video) were euphoria, scars, interpersonal support, pain, and nipples. The most common phenomenological themes (defined as the overarching focus of the video) included postoperative process, gender euphoria, and cost. Given the content present in these videos deals heavily with the surgical process, from consultation to full recovery, we suggest that such content may affect viewers' key health behavior motivations by providing information about the benefits of and barriers to treatment, as well as cues to action. We conclude by providing recommendations for research, policy, and practice, including updating patient education materials and advocating for policies that protect access to evidence-based gender-affirming care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251331948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251331948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media has become an important vehicle for digital health-related communication in recent decades. TikTok-a short form video-sharing application-contains many videos pertaining to masculinizing top surgery (MTS). In line with the health belief model, TikTok content may impact patients' health behaviors by acting on key health belief constructs. However, little is known about what specific content is generated regarding MTS on TikTok. To capture this information, our team utilized a reflexive thematic analysis to systematically describe MTS-related TikTok content on a sample of 250 videos created by 158 unique accounts. We found that our sample received a total of 79.9 million views, 11.9 million likes, 130.9 thousand comments, 581.8 thousand saves, and 176.7 thousand shares. The top five most popular content topics (defined as any topic mentioned within the video) were euphoria, scars, interpersonal support, pain, and nipples. The most common phenomenological themes (defined as the overarching focus of the video) included postoperative process, gender euphoria, and cost. Given the content present in these videos deals heavily with the surgical process, from consultation to full recovery, we suggest that such content may affect viewers' key health behavior motivations by providing information about the benefits of and barriers to treatment, as well as cues to action. We conclude by providing recommendations for research, policy, and practice, including updating patient education materials and advocating for policies that protect access to evidence-based gender-affirming care.

“烦躁不安?“不认识他们”:将健康信念模型应用于TikTok上男性化顶级手术相关内容的反身性主题分析。
近几十年来,社交媒体已成为数字健康沟通的重要工具。tiktok是一个简短的视频分享应用程序,它包含许多与男性化胸部手术(MTS)有关的视频。根据健康信念模型,TikTok内容可能通过作用于关键的健康信念结构来影响患者的健康行为。然而,关于TikTok上的MTS产生了哪些具体内容,人们知之甚少。为了获取这些信息,我们的团队利用反思性主题分析,系统地描述了158个独立账户创建的250个视频样本中与mts相关的TikTok内容。我们发现我们的样本总共收到了7990万次观看,1190万次喜欢,130.9万次评论,581.8万次保存和17.67万次分享。最受欢迎的五个内容主题(定义为视频中提到的任何主题)是欣快感、伤疤、人际支持、疼痛和乳头。最常见的现象学主题(定义为视频的首要焦点)包括术后过程、性别欣愉和成本。鉴于这些视频中的内容主要涉及手术过程,从会诊到完全康复,我们认为这些内容可能会通过提供有关治疗的好处和障碍的信息以及行动线索,影响观众的关键健康行为动机。最后,我们为研究、政策和实践提供建议,包括更新患者教育材料和倡导保护获得循证性别肯定护理的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信