Agricultural Supervisors' Perspectives on Occupational Wildfire Smoke Rules.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julie Postma, Molly Parker, Sheila Hurst, Juliana Romo, Janessa M Graves
{"title":"Agricultural Supervisors' Perspectives on Occupational Wildfire Smoke Rules.","authors":"Julie Postma, Molly Parker, Sheila Hurst, Juliana Romo, Janessa M Graves","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2025.2498342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to 1) explore perceptions of air quality (AQ) monitoring, hazard communication, health impacts of smoke exposure, protective controls and training needs among agricultural supervisors in alignment with the major elements of the wildfire smoke rule, and 2) compare survey responses by the language in which the survey was completed to identify training needs by group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bilingual personnel administered a 29-question survey in Spanish and English to agricultural supervisors and crew chiefs at two industry trainings in Washington (WA) State (12/2023, 1/2024). Data were analyzed in SPSS. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data with chi-squared tests for group comparisons by language.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 surveys were collected, with 61% completed in Spanish. Almost one-fifth (18%) of respondents reported \"hypertension/cardiovascular disease\" as a condition that impacts their own health, and 19% reported \"asthma/respiratory disease.\" Of respondents, 80% agreed they have been exposed to wildfire smoke at work, and 77% reported they supervised workers who have been exposed to smoke. A significantly greater proportion of completers in Spanish (90%) reported being concerned with their own health and their workers' health in relation to smoke exposure than those completing in English (64%). Most (81%) respondents agreed they can recognize signs/symptoms when a worker is not feeling well due to smoke exposure, but only 63% reported having had training on managing workers with smoke-related symptoms. N95 masks were identified as the most realistic protective control to implement when wildfire smoke is present. There were significant differences by language group regarding what resources respondents identified as accurate for AQ monitoring at work. Most respondents (79%) had heard of the wildfire smoke rule in Washington.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wildfire smoke is an occupational health threat for outdoors workers that is expected to increase. Supervisors who work in agricultural workplaces are required by law in Washington, Oregon, and California to monitor AQ, manage workers' symptoms, and implement protective controls at certain AQ thresholds. Study findings identify gaps in these areas and will support ongoing training of a critical subsector of the agricultural workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2025.2498342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to 1) explore perceptions of air quality (AQ) monitoring, hazard communication, health impacts of smoke exposure, protective controls and training needs among agricultural supervisors in alignment with the major elements of the wildfire smoke rule, and 2) compare survey responses by the language in which the survey was completed to identify training needs by group.

Methods: Bilingual personnel administered a 29-question survey in Spanish and English to agricultural supervisors and crew chiefs at two industry trainings in Washington (WA) State (12/2023, 1/2024). Data were analyzed in SPSS. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data with chi-squared tests for group comparisons by language.

Results: A total of 116 surveys were collected, with 61% completed in Spanish. Almost one-fifth (18%) of respondents reported "hypertension/cardiovascular disease" as a condition that impacts their own health, and 19% reported "asthma/respiratory disease." Of respondents, 80% agreed they have been exposed to wildfire smoke at work, and 77% reported they supervised workers who have been exposed to smoke. A significantly greater proportion of completers in Spanish (90%) reported being concerned with their own health and their workers' health in relation to smoke exposure than those completing in English (64%). Most (81%) respondents agreed they can recognize signs/symptoms when a worker is not feeling well due to smoke exposure, but only 63% reported having had training on managing workers with smoke-related symptoms. N95 masks were identified as the most realistic protective control to implement when wildfire smoke is present. There were significant differences by language group regarding what resources respondents identified as accurate for AQ monitoring at work. Most respondents (79%) had heard of the wildfire smoke rule in Washington.

Conclusion: Wildfire smoke is an occupational health threat for outdoors workers that is expected to increase. Supervisors who work in agricultural workplaces are required by law in Washington, Oregon, and California to monitor AQ, manage workers' symptoms, and implement protective controls at certain AQ thresholds. Study findings identify gaps in these areas and will support ongoing training of a critical subsector of the agricultural workforce.

农业监督员对职业野火烟雾规则的看法。
目的:本研究的目的是:1)根据野火烟雾规则的主要要素,探索农业监督员对空气质量(AQ)监测、危害沟通、烟雾暴露对健康的影响、保护性控制和培训需求的看法;2)通过完成调查的语言比较调查结果,以确定培训需求。方法:双语人员在华盛顿州(2023年12月和2024年1月)对两次行业培训的农业主管和船员进行了29个问题的西班牙语和英语调查。数据用SPSS进行分析。采用描述性统计,用卡方检验按语言分组比较。结果:共收集了116份调查,其中61%用西班牙语完成。近五分之一(18%)的受访者报告“高血压/心血管疾病”是影响其自身健康的一种疾病,19%报告“哮喘/呼吸系统疾病”。在受访者中,80%的人承认他们在工作中接触过野火烟雾,77%的人表示他们监督过接触过烟雾的工人。西班牙语完成者(90%)报告说,与英语完成者(64%)相比,西班牙语完成者(90%)更关心自己的健康及其工人的健康与吸烟接触的关系。大多数(81%)受访者同意,当工人因接触烟雾而感到不适时,他们可以识别出迹象/症状,但只有63%的受访者表示接受过管理有烟雾相关症状的工人的培训。N95口罩被认为是在野火烟雾存在时实施的最现实的保护控制措施。在工作中,被调查者认为哪些资源是准确的AQ监测方面,语言组之间存在显著差异。大多数受访者(79%)听说过华盛顿的野火烟雾规则。结论:野火烟雾对户外作业人员的职业健康构成威胁,且该威胁将持续增加。在华盛顿州、俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州,法律要求在农业工作场所工作的主管监测空气质量,管理工人的症状,并在特定的空气质量阈值下实施保护性控制。研究结果确定了这些领域的差距,并将支持对农业劳动力中一个关键分部门的持续培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
Journal of Agromedicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of: • Behavioral and Mental Health • Climate Change • Education/Training • Emerging Practices • Environmental Public Health • Epidemiology • Ergonomics • Injury Prevention • Occupational and Industrial Health • Pesticides • Policy • Safety Interventions and Evaluation • Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信