{"title":"CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF FECAL INCONTINENCE MIXED WITH CONSTIPATION (FI-MC): AN UNDERRECOGNIZED PROBLEM.","authors":"Busra Inal,Yun Yan,Abeer Aziz,Satish Rao","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIMS\r\nFecal incontinence (FI) and Chronic constipation (CC) are diagnosed as distinct problems, although, many suffer with both problems. The phenotypical features and underlying mechanisms of FI mixed with CC (FI-MC) is unclear. We investigated the clinical and pathophysiological characteristics of FI-MC and compared with FI alone and healthy controls.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn a retrospective study, FI patients were categorized as having FI-MC or FI alone. For comparison we recruited healthy controls. All subjects completed bowel symptom questionnaire, anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion, neurophysiology and anal ultrasound tests. Data were compared between the three groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe evaluated 165 patients with FI-MC, 184 with FI, and 31 controls. The prevalence of excessive straining, incomplete evacuation, pain, bloating, use of digital maneuvers and enemas were higher (p<0.001) in the FI-MC than FI group. Anal resting pressure was lower (p<0.001) in FI than FI-MC group and controls. Anal squeeze and sustained squeeze pressures were lower (p<0.001) and lumbar and sacral plexus nerve conduction were prolonged (p<0.001) in the FI-MC and FI groups compared to controls, but similar between patient groups. Dyssynergic defecation was more (p<0.01) prevalent in FI-MC than FI or controls. Rectal sensory thresholds were lower in the FI-MC group than controls (p<0.05), but not between patient groups. FI group had higher (p<0.01) prevalence of anal sphincter defects than FI-MC.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nFI patients can be categorized into two phenotypes as FI alone and FI-MC. Each group demonstrates distinct clinical characteristics and pathophysiology. Recognizing each phenotype may improve management of FI patients.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Fecal incontinence (FI) and Chronic constipation (CC) are diagnosed as distinct problems, although, many suffer with both problems. The phenotypical features and underlying mechanisms of FI mixed with CC (FI-MC) is unclear. We investigated the clinical and pathophysiological characteristics of FI-MC and compared with FI alone and healthy controls.
METHODS
In a retrospective study, FI patients were categorized as having FI-MC or FI alone. For comparison we recruited healthy controls. All subjects completed bowel symptom questionnaire, anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion, neurophysiology and anal ultrasound tests. Data were compared between the three groups.
RESULTS
We evaluated 165 patients with FI-MC, 184 with FI, and 31 controls. The prevalence of excessive straining, incomplete evacuation, pain, bloating, use of digital maneuvers and enemas were higher (p<0.001) in the FI-MC than FI group. Anal resting pressure was lower (p<0.001) in FI than FI-MC group and controls. Anal squeeze and sustained squeeze pressures were lower (p<0.001) and lumbar and sacral plexus nerve conduction were prolonged (p<0.001) in the FI-MC and FI groups compared to controls, but similar between patient groups. Dyssynergic defecation was more (p<0.01) prevalent in FI-MC than FI or controls. Rectal sensory thresholds were lower in the FI-MC group than controls (p<0.05), but not between patient groups. FI group had higher (p<0.01) prevalence of anal sphincter defects than FI-MC.
CONCLUSIONS
FI patients can be categorized into two phenotypes as FI alone and FI-MC. Each group demonstrates distinct clinical characteristics and pathophysiology. Recognizing each phenotype may improve management of FI patients.