Recycling in Ambulatory Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, A Single Center Experience.

Immanuel K Ho,Daniel V Carr,Mary S Coniglio,Karen Rodriguez,Carolyn Simeonides,Frederick A Nunes
{"title":"Recycling in Ambulatory Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, A Single Center Experience.","authors":"Immanuel K Ho,Daniel V Carr,Mary S Coniglio,Karen Rodriguez,Carolyn Simeonides,Frederick A Nunes","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nGastrointestinal endoscopy depends on high utilization of resources and is associated with significant production of waste. Recycling is one strategy that could decrease the carbon footprint from endoscopic activities and reduce landfill waste.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo assess the impact of recycling of endoscopic materials in a high-volume university outpatient ambulatory endoscopy center.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\n3063 patients (1253 M, 1810 F) underwent gastrointestinal procedures over a 6-month period from 1/15/2024 to 6/15/2024. Endoscopy equipment consisting of cinch pad, gauze, lubricant gel packaging, sponge, suction valves, biopsy valve, air water cleaning adapter, water jet connector, suction tubing, plastic bowl, dual end brush, air/water bottle cap, and irrigation tubing were recycled after use. Data was collected through analysis of company invoices. Greenhouse gas avoidance was determined utilizing United States Environmental Protection Agency Waste Reduction Model (WARM). The daily procedure volume and room turnover time were compared to a control group of 3060 patients in the preceding six months.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTotal waste recycled equaled 1708.4 kg, or 0.56 kg per procedure. In contrast to landfilling, recycling was resulted in a net reduction of 4.42 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. Compared to controls, volume per day increased (28.9 vs. 24.3; p<0.05), turnover time per patient decreased (18.2 min vs. 19.9 min; p<0.05), and total regulated medical waste collected remained steady (3007.9 kg vs. 2976.1 kg) (p=0.11).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nRecycling used endoscopy equipment is feasible, reduces the carbon footprint, and does not impede endoscopy unit efficiency.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Gastrointestinal endoscopy depends on high utilization of resources and is associated with significant production of waste. Recycling is one strategy that could decrease the carbon footprint from endoscopic activities and reduce landfill waste. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of recycling of endoscopic materials in a high-volume university outpatient ambulatory endoscopy center. METHODS 3063 patients (1253 M, 1810 F) underwent gastrointestinal procedures over a 6-month period from 1/15/2024 to 6/15/2024. Endoscopy equipment consisting of cinch pad, gauze, lubricant gel packaging, sponge, suction valves, biopsy valve, air water cleaning adapter, water jet connector, suction tubing, plastic bowl, dual end brush, air/water bottle cap, and irrigation tubing were recycled after use. Data was collected through analysis of company invoices. Greenhouse gas avoidance was determined utilizing United States Environmental Protection Agency Waste Reduction Model (WARM). The daily procedure volume and room turnover time were compared to a control group of 3060 patients in the preceding six months. RESULTS Total waste recycled equaled 1708.4 kg, or 0.56 kg per procedure. In contrast to landfilling, recycling was resulted in a net reduction of 4.42 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. Compared to controls, volume per day increased (28.9 vs. 24.3; p<0.05), turnover time per patient decreased (18.2 min vs. 19.9 min; p<0.05), and total regulated medical waste collected remained steady (3007.9 kg vs. 2976.1 kg) (p=0.11). CONCLUSION Recycling used endoscopy equipment is feasible, reduces the carbon footprint, and does not impede endoscopy unit efficiency.
循环在流动胃肠道内窥镜,一个单一的中心经验。
胃肠内窥镜检查依赖于资源的高利用率,并与大量废物的产生有关。回收是一种可以减少内窥镜活动产生的碳足迹和减少垃圾填埋的策略。目的评价内镜材料回收在大容量大学门诊门诊内镜中心的影响。方法3063例患者(1253例男性,1810例女性)在2024年1月15日至6月15日的6个月内接受了胃肠道手术。由夹垫、纱布、润滑凝胶包装、海绵、吸入阀、活检阀、空气水清洗适配器、喷水连接器、吸入管、塑料碗、双头刷、空气/水瓶盖、灌油管组成的内镜设备使用后回收。数据是通过分析公司发票收集的。利用美国环境保护署减少废物模型(WARM)确定了温室气体的避免。每日手术量和病房周转时间与前六个月3060名患者的对照组进行比较。结果回收废物总量为1708.4 kg,每道工序回收废物0.56 kg。与填埋相比,回收导致了4.42公吨二氧化碳当量的净减少。与对照组相比,每天的数量增加了(28.9对24.3;P <0.05),每位患者翻转时间缩短(18.2 min vs. 19.9 min;P <0.05),收集的管制医疗废物总量保持稳定(3007.9 kg对2976.1 kg) (P =0.11)。结论回收使用过的内窥镜设备是可行的,减少了碳足迹,且不影响内窥镜装置的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信