A Retrospective Analysis of PK and Response of Oral Ibuprofen in the Treatment of a Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates.

IF 2.9 4区 医学
Mohd Asif, Katelyn Sushko, Abdul Razak, Sayem Borhan, Michael Rieder, John van den Anker, Samira Samiee-Zafarghandy
{"title":"A Retrospective Analysis of PK and Response of Oral Ibuprofen in the Treatment of a Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates.","authors":"Mohd Asif, Katelyn Sushko, Abdul Razak, Sayem Borhan, Michael Rieder, John van den Anker, Samira Samiee-Zafarghandy","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral ibuprofen is the preferred pharmacotherapeutic option for treatment of a persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), but evidence for its optimal use in extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs) remains limited. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of oral ibuprofen in ELGANs of ≤72 h postnatal age (PNA) on standard (SD) versus those >72 h PNA on high-dose (HD) regimen for closure of persistent PDA. This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous population PK study of ELGANs with a persistent PDA treated with a SD (10-5-5 mg/kg/day, PNA <72 h) versus a HD (20-10-10 mg/kg/day, PNA >72 h) oral ibuprofen, with the primary aim of comparing degree of exposure, defined as AUC<sub>0-24</sub> (AUC from time 0 to 24 h). Twelve ELGANs received SD versus 11 receiving HD oral ibuprofen. The mean (SD) of exposure at 24 h (AUC<sub>0-24 h</sub>) was 486 (128) and 509 (208) (P = .41) and at 72 h (AUC<sub>0-72 h</sub>) was 1529 (493) and 1510 (820) (P = .94). Two (16%) ELGANs in the HD group developed severe gastrointestinal (GI) AEs and 1 (9%) in the SD had severe intraventricular hemorrhage. The use of SD and HD oral ibuprofen in ELGANs with PNA of <72 h and those >72 h, respectively, resulted in comparable exposure. The PNA-dependent response to oral ibuprofen and exposure-response relationship in ELGANs of higher PNA needs further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral ibuprofen is the preferred pharmacotherapeutic option for treatment of a persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), but evidence for its optimal use in extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs) remains limited. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of oral ibuprofen in ELGANs of ≤72 h postnatal age (PNA) on standard (SD) versus those >72 h PNA on high-dose (HD) regimen for closure of persistent PDA. This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous population PK study of ELGANs with a persistent PDA treated with a SD (10-5-5 mg/kg/day, PNA <72 h) versus a HD (20-10-10 mg/kg/day, PNA >72 h) oral ibuprofen, with the primary aim of comparing degree of exposure, defined as AUC0-24 (AUC from time 0 to 24 h). Twelve ELGANs received SD versus 11 receiving HD oral ibuprofen. The mean (SD) of exposure at 24 h (AUC0-24 h) was 486 (128) and 509 (208) (P = .41) and at 72 h (AUC0-72 h) was 1529 (493) and 1510 (820) (P = .94). Two (16%) ELGANs in the HD group developed severe gastrointestinal (GI) AEs and 1 (9%) in the SD had severe intraventricular hemorrhage. The use of SD and HD oral ibuprofen in ELGANs with PNA of <72 h and those >72 h, respectively, resulted in comparable exposure. The PNA-dependent response to oral ibuprofen and exposure-response relationship in ELGANs of higher PNA needs further investigation.

口服布洛芬治疗极低胎龄新生儿动脉导管未闭的PK和疗效回顾性分析。
口服布洛芬是治疗持续性动脉导管未闭(PDA)的首选药物治疗选择,但其在极低胎龄新生儿(elgan)中的最佳使用证据仍然有限。在本研究中,我们旨在研究口服布洛芬在标准(SD)和高剂量(HD)方案下≤72 h出生年龄(PNA)的elgan中关闭持久性PDA的药代动力学和暴露反应关系。这是一项回顾性分析先前elgan群体PK研究的数据,该研究使用SD (10-5-5 mg/kg/day, PNA 72 h)口服布洛芬治疗持续性PDA,主要目的是比较暴露程度,定义为AUC0-24(时间0至24 h的AUC)。12名elgan接受SD治疗,11名接受HD口服布洛芬治疗。24 h (AUC0-24 h)暴露的平均SD分别为486(128)和509 (208)(P = 0.41), 72 h (AUC0-72 h)暴露的平均SD分别为1529(493)和1510 (820)(P = 0.94)。HD组2例(16%)elgan发生严重胃肠道(GI) ae, SD组1例(9%)发生严重脑室内出血。在PNA为72 h的elgan中分别使用SD和HD口服布洛芬,可产生相当的暴露。高PNA的elgan对口服布洛芬的PNA依赖性反应及暴露-反应关系有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信