Prevention of central venous catheter occlusion by saline with or without heparin in intensive care unit after surgical intervention: a double-blind, randomized trial.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Masayuki Nakamoto, Takahiro Tamura, Eri Kobayashi, Mariko Kawaguchi, Yuri Matsuoka, Akiko Fujii, Masahiko Ando, Yoko Kubo, Takahiro Imaizumi, Yasuhiro Miyagawa, Takayuki Inagaki, Shogo Suzuki, Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
{"title":"Prevention of central venous catheter occlusion by saline with or without heparin in intensive care unit after surgical intervention: a double-blind, randomized trial.","authors":"Masayuki Nakamoto, Takahiro Tamura, Eri Kobayashi, Mariko Kawaguchi, Yuri Matsuoka, Akiko Fujii, Masahiko Ando, Yoko Kubo, Takahiro Imaizumi, Yasuhiro Miyagawa, Takayuki Inagaki, Shogo Suzuki, Kimitoshi Nishiwaki","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.87.1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heparinized saline is used to prevent catheter obstruction; however, it is associated with concerns regarding the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and the accuracy of the blood test results. This study compared the impact of saline with and without heparin on central venous catheter occlusion rates in post-surgical intensive care unit patients using a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled design. Patients aged 20-90 years planned to experience central venous catheter insertion and postoperative intensive care unit admission were enrolled and were randomly assigned to either the heparin group (administered normal saline with heparin) or the control group (administered normal saline alone), based on a 1:1 ratio. Nurses blinded to patient allocation performed the occlusion assessment (every 24 h). The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the time to occlusion or removal of each catheter. Central venous catheter insertion results of 136 patients showed no significant variation in occlusion rates between the heparin and control groups within the first 3 days. There was no significant difference between normal saline with and without heparin in preventing central venous occlusion in the intensive care unit up to 3 days post-surgery. The results of this study suggest that it is not necessary to use normal saline with heparin in the management of central venous catheter occlusion, at least when moving from the operating room to the intensive care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"87 1","pages":"51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.87.1.51","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heparinized saline is used to prevent catheter obstruction; however, it is associated with concerns regarding the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and the accuracy of the blood test results. This study compared the impact of saline with and without heparin on central venous catheter occlusion rates in post-surgical intensive care unit patients using a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled design. Patients aged 20-90 years planned to experience central venous catheter insertion and postoperative intensive care unit admission were enrolled and were randomly assigned to either the heparin group (administered normal saline with heparin) or the control group (administered normal saline alone), based on a 1:1 ratio. Nurses blinded to patient allocation performed the occlusion assessment (every 24 h). The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the time to occlusion or removal of each catheter. Central venous catheter insertion results of 136 patients showed no significant variation in occlusion rates between the heparin and control groups within the first 3 days. There was no significant difference between normal saline with and without heparin in preventing central venous occlusion in the intensive care unit up to 3 days post-surgery. The results of this study suggest that it is not necessary to use normal saline with heparin in the management of central venous catheter occlusion, at least when moving from the operating room to the intensive care unit.

加肝素或不加肝素预防重症监护病房手术干预后中心静脉导管阻塞:一项双盲随机试验。
肝素生理盐水用于防止导管阻塞;然而,它与肝素引起的血小板减少症的发生率和血液检查结果的准确性有关。本研究采用前瞻性、双盲、随机对照设计,比较了盐水加肝素和不加肝素对术后重症监护病房患者中心静脉导管阻塞率的影响。纳入20-90岁计划进行中心静脉置管并术后入住重症监护病房的患者,并根据1:1的比例随机分配到肝素组(给予肝素加生理盐水)或对照组(单独给予生理盐水)。对患者分配不知情的护士进行闭塞性评估(每24小时)。Kaplan-Meier曲线用于评估每根导管闭塞或拔除的时间。136例患者中心静脉置管结果显示,肝素组与对照组在前3天内闭塞率无显著差异。术后3天,加肝素和不加肝素的生理盐水在预防重症监护病房中心静脉阻塞方面无显著差异。本研究的结果表明,在中心静脉导管阻塞的治疗中,不需要使用生理盐水和肝素,至少在从手术室转移到重症监护病房时是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted. Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信