Photon-Counting CT-Angiography to Assess Intracranial Stents and Flow Diverters in Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Frederic De Beukelaer, Mohammed El Halal, Sophie De Beukelaer, Laura L Wuyts, Martin Wiesmann, Hani Ridwan, Charlotte S Weyland
{"title":"Photon-Counting CT-Angiography to Assess Intracranial Stents and Flow Diverters in Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography.","authors":"Frederic De Beukelaer, Mohammed El Halal, Sophie De Beukelaer, Laura L Wuyts, Martin Wiesmann, Hani Ridwan, Charlotte S Weyland","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01519-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Photon-Counting Detector CT is characterized by enhanced image post-processing capabilities. The diagnostic accuracy of PCD-CT angiography (PCD-CTA) in assessing intracranial stents (ICS) and flow diverters (FD) has yet to be compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent ICS or FD implantation between April 2023 and May 2024. Polyenergetic images, along with virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI), pure lumen (PL) and iodine (IOD) reconstructions were assessed by three readers using a 5-point Likert scale and defined regions of interest (ROIs). A blinded analysis was performed to identify relevant lumen reduction. The diagnostic accuracy of PCD-CTA was compared to DSA by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 patients (mean age 59 ± 13 years; 14 women) with 14 implanted ICS and 10 FD were analyzed. Across all pairwise comparisons, pooled VMI reconstructions demonstrated higher ratings and signal-to-noise ratios compared to IOD, PL and UHR reconstructions (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). In the pooled assessment of DSA of in-stent vessel lumen 18 (11%) of the 162 vessel segments and 6 (33%) of the 18 patients presented relevant narrowing of the in-stent vessel lumen. The sensitivity of PCD-CTA for detecting stenosis was 100% (18 of 18 in-stent vessel segments), while specificity was 89% (128/144 in-stent vessel segments). All readers reported a 100% negative predictive value (128/128 in-stent vessel segments).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Photon-Counting Detector CT might provide a reliable assessment of intracranial vessels following stent or flow diverter implantation comparable to DSA in many cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01519-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Photon-Counting Detector CT is characterized by enhanced image post-processing capabilities. The diagnostic accuracy of PCD-CT angiography (PCD-CTA) in assessing intracranial stents (ICS) and flow diverters (FD) has yet to be compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent ICS or FD implantation between April 2023 and May 2024. Polyenergetic images, along with virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI), pure lumen (PL) and iodine (IOD) reconstructions were assessed by three readers using a 5-point Likert scale and defined regions of interest (ROIs). A blinded analysis was performed to identify relevant lumen reduction. The diagnostic accuracy of PCD-CTA was compared to DSA by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: A total of 18 patients (mean age 59 ± 13 years; 14 women) with 14 implanted ICS and 10 FD were analyzed. Across all pairwise comparisons, pooled VMI reconstructions demonstrated higher ratings and signal-to-noise ratios compared to IOD, PL and UHR reconstructions (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). In the pooled assessment of DSA of in-stent vessel lumen 18 (11%) of the 162 vessel segments and 6 (33%) of the 18 patients presented relevant narrowing of the in-stent vessel lumen. The sensitivity of PCD-CTA for detecting stenosis was 100% (18 of 18 in-stent vessel segments), while specificity was 89% (128/144 in-stent vessel segments). All readers reported a 100% negative predictive value (128/128 in-stent vessel segments).

Conclusion: Photon-Counting Detector CT might provide a reliable assessment of intracranial vessels following stent or flow diverter implantation comparable to DSA in many cases.

光子计数ct血管造影评估颅内支架和血流分流器与数字减影血管造影的比较。
目的:光子计数检测器CT具有增强的图像后处理能力。PCD-CT血管造影(PCD-CTA)在评估颅内支架(ICS)和分流器(FD)的诊断准确性尚未与数字减影血管造影(DSA)进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2023年4月至2024年5月期间所有连续接受ICS或FD植入的患者。多能图像,以及虚拟单能成像(VMI),纯流明(PL)和碘(IOD)重建由三位读者使用5点李克特量表和定义的兴趣区域(roi)进行评估。进行盲法分析以确定相关的管腔缩小。通过计算受者工作特征曲线下面积,比较PCD-CTA与DSA的诊断准确率。结果:共18例患者(平均年龄59岁 ±13岁;14例女性)植入ICS 14例,FD 10例。在所有两两比较中,与IOD, PL和UHR重建相比,合并VMI重建显示出更高的评分和信噪比(p )结论:在许多情况下,光子计数检测器CT可以提供与DSA相当的支架或分流器植入后颅内血管的可靠评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信