Biomaterials for Guided Tissue Regeneration and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Review.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nathália Dantas Duarte, Paula Buzo Frigério, Gloria Estefania Amaya Chica, Roberta Okamoto, Rogério Leone Buchaim, Daniela Vieira Buchaim, Michel Reis Messora, João Paulo Mardegan Issa
{"title":"Biomaterials for Guided Tissue Regeneration and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Review.","authors":"Nathália Dantas Duarte, Paula Buzo Frigério, Gloria Estefania Amaya Chica, Roberta Okamoto, Rogério Leone Buchaim, Daniela Vieira Buchaim, Michel Reis Messora, João Paulo Mardegan Issa","doi":"10.3390/dj13040179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review aims to provide an overview of the types of membranes, bone substitutes, and mucosal substitutes used for GTR and GBR and briefly explores recent innovations for tissue regeneration and their future perspectives. Since this is a narrative review, no systematic search, meta-analysis, or statistical analysis was conducted. Using biomaterials for GTR and GBR provides a reduction in postoperative morbidity, as it contributes to less invasive clinical procedures, serving as an alternative to autogenous grafts. Moreover, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews are essential for the evaluation of new biomaterials. These studies provide more robust evidence and help guide clinical practice in the selection of safer and more effective biomaterials, allowing for the personalization of treatment protocols for each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13040179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review aims to provide an overview of the types of membranes, bone substitutes, and mucosal substitutes used for GTR and GBR and briefly explores recent innovations for tissue regeneration and their future perspectives. Since this is a narrative review, no systematic search, meta-analysis, or statistical analysis was conducted. Using biomaterials for GTR and GBR provides a reduction in postoperative morbidity, as it contributes to less invasive clinical procedures, serving as an alternative to autogenous grafts. Moreover, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews are essential for the evaluation of new biomaterials. These studies provide more robust evidence and help guide clinical practice in the selection of safer and more effective biomaterials, allowing for the personalization of treatment protocols for each patient.

引导组织再生和引导骨再生的生物材料研究进展。
本文综述了用于GTR和GBR的膜、骨替代品和粘膜替代品的类型,并简要探讨了组织再生的最新创新及其未来前景。由于这是一篇叙述性综述,因此没有进行系统的搜索、元分析或统计分析。使用生物材料进行GTR和GBR可以降低术后发病率,因为它有助于减少临床手术的侵入性,可以作为自体移植物的替代选择。此外,随机临床试验(rct)和系统评价是评价新生物材料的必要条件。这些研究提供了更有力的证据,并有助于指导临床实践选择更安全、更有效的生物材料,从而为每位患者提供个性化的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信