Anaphylaxis trend before and during pandemic: COVID-19 did not affect anaphylaxis frequency.

IF 2.6 Q2 ALLERGY
A Sangalli, A Fasiello, V Pravettoni, D Consonni, V Melli, A Jachetti, V Longo, N Montano, F Rivolta
{"title":"Anaphylaxis trend before and during pandemic: COVID-19 did not affect anaphylaxis frequency.","authors":"A Sangalli, A Fasiello, V Pravettoni, D Consonni, V Melli, A Jachetti, V Longo, N Montano, F Rivolta","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background</b>. Data on epidemiology of anaphylaxis are difficult to record. During the lockdown in 2020-2021 due to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), referrals to Emergency Department (E.D.) reduced. The aims of the study are to determine anaphylaxis frequency before and during COVID-19 pandemic and risk factors for severity. <b>Methods</b>. Clinical records from a general E.D. of Milan in Italy were retrospectively evaluated before (2018-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) analyzing demographic data, comorbidities, chronic therapies, causes, severity and adrenaline use. <b>Results</b>. The frequency of anaphylaxis remained stable (120/104129 = 0.12% in 2018-2019; 72/66720 = 0.11% in 2020-2021). No differences in the occurrence of anaphylaxis were found in sex and mean age. The main causes of anaphylaxis were food (2018-2019: 53% vs 2020-2021: 51%) and drugs (2018-2019: 27% vs 2020-2021: 33%). Hymenoptera stings had a low occurrence and unidentified trigger was about 15% in each period. The severity of anaphylaxis had a similar distribution in the two periods. Gender and cardiovascular diseases did not influence the severity, instead a positive correlation was found in age over 50 yo (p<0.001). Angiotensin II receptors blockers, β-blockers, diuretics and proton pump inhibitors were associated with increasing severity (p<0.01). Adrenaline administration was similar in the two periods. <b>Conclusions</b>. Anaphylaxis frequency was not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Food anaphylaxis remained the most important cause in the urban area. The severity of anaphylaxis was affected by ageing and some chronic therapies, which indirectly point out the role of chronic diseases in the clinical presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Data on epidemiology of anaphylaxis are difficult to record. During the lockdown in 2020-2021 due to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), referrals to Emergency Department (E.D.) reduced. The aims of the study are to determine anaphylaxis frequency before and during COVID-19 pandemic and risk factors for severity. Methods. Clinical records from a general E.D. of Milan in Italy were retrospectively evaluated before (2018-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) analyzing demographic data, comorbidities, chronic therapies, causes, severity and adrenaline use. Results. The frequency of anaphylaxis remained stable (120/104129 = 0.12% in 2018-2019; 72/66720 = 0.11% in 2020-2021). No differences in the occurrence of anaphylaxis were found in sex and mean age. The main causes of anaphylaxis were food (2018-2019: 53% vs 2020-2021: 51%) and drugs (2018-2019: 27% vs 2020-2021: 33%). Hymenoptera stings had a low occurrence and unidentified trigger was about 15% in each period. The severity of anaphylaxis had a similar distribution in the two periods. Gender and cardiovascular diseases did not influence the severity, instead a positive correlation was found in age over 50 yo (p<0.001). Angiotensin II receptors blockers, β-blockers, diuretics and proton pump inhibitors were associated with increasing severity (p<0.01). Adrenaline administration was similar in the two periods. Conclusions. Anaphylaxis frequency was not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Food anaphylaxis remained the most important cause in the urban area. The severity of anaphylaxis was affected by ageing and some chronic therapies, which indirectly point out the role of chronic diseases in the clinical presentation.

大流行前和期间的过敏反应趋势:COVID-19不影响过敏反应频率。
摘要:背景。关于过敏反应的流行病学数据很难记录。在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)导致的2020-2021年封锁期间,急诊科(ed)的转诊减少了。该研究的目的是确定COVID-19大流行之前和期间的过敏反应频率以及严重程度的危险因素。方法。回顾性评估了意大利米兰一家普通急诊室在2018-2019年和2020-2021年COVID-19大流行之前的临床记录,分析了人口统计数据、合并症、慢性治疗、原因、严重程度和肾上腺素使用情况。结果。2018-2019年,过敏反应发生频率保持稳定(120/104129 = 0.12%;72/66720 = 2020-2021年0.11%)。过敏反应的发生在性别和平均年龄上没有差异。过敏反应的主要原因是食物(2018-2019年:53%,2020-2021年:51%)和药物(2018-2019年:27%,2020-2021年:33%)。膜翅目昆虫蜇伤发生率较低,各时段不明原因蜇伤发生率约为15%。过敏反应的严重程度在两个时期有相似的分布。性别和心血管疾病不影响其严重程度,而在50岁以上的人群中存在正相关(p结论。过敏反应频率不受COVID-19大流行的影响。食物过敏反应仍然是城市地区最重要的原因。过敏反应的严重程度受年龄和一些慢性治疗的影响,这间接指出慢性疾病在临床表现中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信