Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
{"title":"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Anas R Alashram","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2496523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairments are one of the most common consequences in stroke survivors. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) produces electromagnetic pulses transmitted through a coil over the individual's head. This review aims to examine the effects of rTMS on cognition in stroke survivors, identify who would be most likely to benefit from the therapy, define the optimal therapeutic parameters, and provide recommendations. \"PubMed, Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, PEDro, and Web of Science\" were searched until December 5, 2024. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 4 was used for quantitative analysis. The \"Cochrane Collaboration tool\" was employed to assess the quality of the selected studies. Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. In total, 608 stroke survivors (mean age 60.17 years) were involved in the present review. The meta-analysis showed a small, non-significant effect of rTMS on global cognitive function in stroke survivors (Functional independence measure-cognitive; SMD = 0.386, 95% CI: -0.331 to 1.103, <i>p</i> = .291), (Mini-Mental State Examination; SMD = 0.162, 95% CI: -0.405 to 0.730, <i>p</i> = .575), and (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SMD = 0.204, 95% CI: -0.613 to 1.021, <i>p</i> = .625) with high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 77-85%). While some studies reported improvements in specific cognitive domains, overall findings indicate substantial variability and uncertainty. This review highlights inconclusive evidence on the effects of rTMS on various cognitive domains in patients with stroke. The frequency of rTMS and coil location are essential factors in determining outcomes. Future studies are strongly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2496523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cognitive impairments are one of the most common consequences in stroke survivors. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) produces electromagnetic pulses transmitted through a coil over the individual's head. This review aims to examine the effects of rTMS on cognition in stroke survivors, identify who would be most likely to benefit from the therapy, define the optimal therapeutic parameters, and provide recommendations. "PubMed, Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, PEDro, and Web of Science" were searched until December 5, 2024. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 4 was used for quantitative analysis. The "Cochrane Collaboration tool" was employed to assess the quality of the selected studies. Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. In total, 608 stroke survivors (mean age 60.17 years) were involved in the present review. The meta-analysis showed a small, non-significant effect of rTMS on global cognitive function in stroke survivors (Functional independence measure-cognitive; SMD = 0.386, 95% CI: -0.331 to 1.103, p = .291), (Mini-Mental State Examination; SMD = 0.162, 95% CI: -0.405 to 0.730, p = .575), and (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SMD = 0.204, 95% CI: -0.613 to 1.021, p = .625) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 77-85%). While some studies reported improvements in specific cognitive domains, overall findings indicate substantial variability and uncertainty. This review highlights inconclusive evidence on the effects of rTMS on various cognitive domains in patients with stroke. The frequency of rTMS and coil location are essential factors in determining outcomes. Future studies are strongly warranted.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.