Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anas R Alashram
{"title":"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Anas R Alashram","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2496523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairments are one of the most common consequences in stroke survivors. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) produces electromagnetic pulses transmitted through a coil over the individual's head. This review aims to examine the effects of rTMS on cognition in stroke survivors, identify who would be most likely to benefit from the therapy, define the optimal therapeutic parameters, and provide recommendations. \"PubMed, Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, PEDro, and Web of Science\" were searched until December 5, 2024. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 4 was used for quantitative analysis. The \"Cochrane Collaboration tool\" was employed to assess the quality of the selected studies. Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. In total, 608 stroke survivors (mean age 60.17 years) were involved in the present review. The meta-analysis showed a small, non-significant effect of rTMS on global cognitive function in stroke survivors (Functional independence measure-cognitive; SMD = 0.386, 95% CI: -0.331 to 1.103, <i>p</i> = .291), (Mini-Mental State Examination; SMD = 0.162, 95% CI: -0.405 to 0.730, <i>p</i> = .575), and (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SMD = 0.204, 95% CI: -0.613 to 1.021, <i>p</i> = .625) with high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 77-85%). While some studies reported improvements in specific cognitive domains, overall findings indicate substantial variability and uncertainty. This review highlights inconclusive evidence on the effects of rTMS on various cognitive domains in patients with stroke. The frequency of rTMS and coil location are essential factors in determining outcomes. Future studies are strongly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2496523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive impairments are one of the most common consequences in stroke survivors. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) produces electromagnetic pulses transmitted through a coil over the individual's head. This review aims to examine the effects of rTMS on cognition in stroke survivors, identify who would be most likely to benefit from the therapy, define the optimal therapeutic parameters, and provide recommendations. "PubMed, Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, PEDro, and Web of Science" were searched until December 5, 2024. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 4 was used for quantitative analysis. The "Cochrane Collaboration tool" was employed to assess the quality of the selected studies. Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. In total, 608 stroke survivors (mean age 60.17 years) were involved in the present review. The meta-analysis showed a small, non-significant effect of rTMS on global cognitive function in stroke survivors (Functional independence measure-cognitive; SMD = 0.386, 95% CI: -0.331 to 1.103, p = .291), (Mini-Mental State Examination; SMD = 0.162, 95% CI: -0.405 to 0.730, p = .575), and (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SMD = 0.204, 95% CI: -0.613 to 1.021, p = .625) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 77-85%). While some studies reported improvements in specific cognitive domains, overall findings indicate substantial variability and uncertainty. This review highlights inconclusive evidence on the effects of rTMS on various cognitive domains in patients with stroke. The frequency of rTMS and coil location are essential factors in determining outcomes. Future studies are strongly warranted.

反复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中幸存者认知康复:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
认知障碍是中风幸存者最常见的后果之一。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)产生的电磁脉冲通过个人头部上方的线圈传输。本综述旨在研究rTMS对脑卒中幸存者认知的影响,确定谁最有可能从治疗中受益,确定最佳治疗参数,并提供建议。“PubMed, Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, PEDro, and Web of Science”被搜索到2024年12月5日。采用第4版综合meta分析进行定量分析。采用“Cochrane协作工具”评估所选研究的质量。13项研究符合入选标准。本研究共纳入608名中风幸存者(平均年龄60.17岁)。荟萃分析显示,rTMS对脑卒中幸存者整体认知功能的影响很小,不显著(功能独立性测量-认知;SMD = 0.386, 95% CI: -0.331 ~ 1.103, p = 0.291),(简易精神状态检查;SMD = 0.162, 95% CI: -0.405 ~ 0.730, p = .575)和(蒙特利尔认知评估;SMD = 0.204, 95% CI: -0.613 ~ 1.021, p = 0.625),异质性高(I2 = 77 ~ 85%)。虽然一些研究报告了特定认知领域的改善,但总体发现表明存在实质性的变异性和不确定性。这篇综述强调了rTMS对脑卒中患者各种认知领域影响的不确定证据。rTMS频率和线圈位置是决定结果的重要因素。未来的研究是非常必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信