"This Should Be the Answer!": The Evolution of Relational Dynamic Capabilities in the Co-Production of Maternity Care Services to Vulnerable Women.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Federica Angeli, Carlotta Gamberini, Elena Ambrosino
{"title":"\"This Should Be the Answer!\": The Evolution of Relational Dynamic Capabilities in the Co-Production of Maternity Care Services to Vulnerable Women.","authors":"Federica Angeli, Carlotta Gamberini, Elena Ambrosino","doi":"10.1177/10497323251317437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Established models of maternity care delivery in high-income countries have increasingly proved inadequate to address the highly idiosyncratic and heterogenous needs of vulnerable pregnant women, such as ethnic minorities, migrants, and asylum seekers, who still disproportionately suffer from high maternal morbidity and mortality. Intersectionality theory has been salient to represent vulnerable women's lived, subjective experience of inequity in healthcare access; however, it has proved less effective in informing organizational and systemic change able to redress the intersectional disadvantage affecting vulnerable populations. To address these theoretical and empirical gaps, this article develops an in-depth single case study around the HAAMLA team, a specialized community midwifery group active at the Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust in England (UK), which specifically evolved over time to cater to the needs of vulnerable pregnant women. We conducted semi-structured interviews with the midwives and team leadership and triangulated our data with archival material and participant feedback. Building abductively on a novel intersectional, socio-ecological theoretical framework, our findings highlight how HAAMLA midwives developed a radically different model of maternity care delivery that conceptualizes vulnerability as an intersectional, socially constructed category and that co-produces holistic, bespoke care services together with the women and with the external network of partner agencies. In doing so, the team developed and leveraged two key relational dynamic capabilities: adaptive network activation and trust-based relationship building. The article discusses contributions to theory, policy, and practice, while providing fresh insight into a strongly innovative and potentially replicable model of maternity care delivery to vulnerable groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251317437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251317437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Established models of maternity care delivery in high-income countries have increasingly proved inadequate to address the highly idiosyncratic and heterogenous needs of vulnerable pregnant women, such as ethnic minorities, migrants, and asylum seekers, who still disproportionately suffer from high maternal morbidity and mortality. Intersectionality theory has been salient to represent vulnerable women's lived, subjective experience of inequity in healthcare access; however, it has proved less effective in informing organizational and systemic change able to redress the intersectional disadvantage affecting vulnerable populations. To address these theoretical and empirical gaps, this article develops an in-depth single case study around the HAAMLA team, a specialized community midwifery group active at the Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust in England (UK), which specifically evolved over time to cater to the needs of vulnerable pregnant women. We conducted semi-structured interviews with the midwives and team leadership and triangulated our data with archival material and participant feedback. Building abductively on a novel intersectional, socio-ecological theoretical framework, our findings highlight how HAAMLA midwives developed a radically different model of maternity care delivery that conceptualizes vulnerability as an intersectional, socially constructed category and that co-produces holistic, bespoke care services together with the women and with the external network of partner agencies. In doing so, the team developed and leveraged two key relational dynamic capabilities: adaptive network activation and trust-based relationship building. The article discusses contributions to theory, policy, and practice, while providing fresh insight into a strongly innovative and potentially replicable model of maternity care delivery to vulnerable groups.

“这应该就是答案!”:弱势妇女产护服务合作生产中关系动态能力的演化。
事实日益证明,高收入国家现有的产妇保健提供模式不足以满足弱势孕妇(如少数民族、移民和寻求庇护者)高度特殊和异质的需求,这些孕妇仍然不成比例地遭受高产妇发病率和死亡率的折磨。交叉性理论已显著代表弱势妇女的生活,主观经验不平等的医疗保健服务;然而,事实证明,它在告知能够纠正影响弱势群体的交叉不利因素的组织和系统变革方面效果较差。为了解决这些理论和经验上的差距,本文围绕HAAMLA团队进行了深入的单一案例研究,HAAMLA团队是活跃在英格兰(英国)利兹教学医院NHS信托基金会的一个专业社区助产小组,随着时间的推移,专门发展以满足弱势孕妇的需求。我们对助产士和团队领导进行了半结构化访谈,并将我们的数据与档案材料和参与者反馈进行了三角测量。建立在一个新的交叉的社会生态理论框架上,我们的研究结果强调了HAAMLA助产士如何开发出一种完全不同的产科护理交付模式,将脆弱性概念化为一个交叉的、社会构建的类别,并与妇女和合作伙伴机构的外部网络共同生产整体的、定制的护理服务。在此过程中,团队开发并利用了两个关键的关系动态能力:自适应网络激活和基于信任的关系建立。本文讨论了对理论、政策和实践的贡献,同时为向弱势群体提供产妇护理的强大创新和潜在可复制模式提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信