Lung Deposition of Extrafine Versus Nonextrafine Aerosols at Low Inhalation Flow Rates in Adult Asthma Patients: A Composition Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Maciej Kupczyk, Michał Panek, Hosein Sadafi, Wilfried De Backer, Maciej Wojakiewicz, Tomasz Dębowski
{"title":"Lung Deposition of Extrafine Versus Nonextrafine Aerosols at Low Inhalation Flow Rates in Adult Asthma Patients: A Composition Study.","authors":"Maciej Kupczyk, Michał Panek, Hosein Sadafi, Wilfried De Backer, Maciej Wojakiewicz, Tomasz Dębowski","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2024.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Backgroud:</i></b> A key attribute in selecting an oral inhaler device for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma is its ability to dispense a high degree of pulmonary deposition of the drug at low inspiratory flows. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this study, the lung deposition of extrafine formulations of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and formoterol fumarate (FF) (pressurized metered-dose inhaler [pMDI] and dry powder inhaler [DPI], NEXThaler) was compared with that of nonextrafine formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol (FP/SAL) Diskus DPI and budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FF) Turbuhaler DPI in 10 patients. Diskus intrathoracic (peripheral and central) lung deposition was estimated at low inhalation flow rates (30 and 40 L/min) <i>via</i> validated functional respiratory imaging (FRI) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The BDP/FF NEXThaler and BDP/FF pMDI had the highest median percentages of intrathoracic deposition, with consistent mean values of approximately 50% and 40%, respectively. The median percentage of peripheral deposition from extrafine inhalers was above 30% with BDP/FF NEXThaler and pMDI, 5% or less with the FP/SAL Diskus at both flow rates, and ranged between 12% and 22% with the BUD/FF Turbuhaler DPI at flow rates of 30 and 40 L/min, respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Extrafine BDP/FF using NEXThaler and pMDI resulted in greater peripheral deposition of both the inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonists moieties than the nonextrafine FP/SAL Discus and BUD/FF DPIs did.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgroud: A key attribute in selecting an oral inhaler device for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma is its ability to dispense a high degree of pulmonary deposition of the drug at low inspiratory flows. Methods: In this study, the lung deposition of extrafine formulations of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and formoterol fumarate (FF) (pressurized metered-dose inhaler [pMDI] and dry powder inhaler [DPI], NEXThaler) was compared with that of nonextrafine formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol (FP/SAL) Diskus DPI and budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FF) Turbuhaler DPI in 10 patients. Diskus intrathoracic (peripheral and central) lung deposition was estimated at low inhalation flow rates (30 and 40 L/min) via validated functional respiratory imaging (FRI) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods. Results: The BDP/FF NEXThaler and BDP/FF pMDI had the highest median percentages of intrathoracic deposition, with consistent mean values of approximately 50% and 40%, respectively. The median percentage of peripheral deposition from extrafine inhalers was above 30% with BDP/FF NEXThaler and pMDI, 5% or less with the FP/SAL Diskus at both flow rates, and ranged between 12% and 22% with the BUD/FF Turbuhaler DPI at flow rates of 30 and 40 L/min, respectively. Conclusions: Extrafine BDP/FF using NEXThaler and pMDI resulted in greater peripheral deposition of both the inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonists moieties than the nonextrafine FP/SAL Discus and BUD/FF DPIs did.

成人哮喘患者低吸入流速下肺外颗粒物与非外颗粒物的沉积:一项成分研究。
背景:选择用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘的口服吸入器装置的一个关键属性是其在低吸气流量下分配高度肺沉积药物的能力。方法:本研究比较了10例双丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)和富马酸福莫特罗(FF) (NEXThaler加压计量吸入器[pMDI]和干粉吸入器[DPI])与氟替卡松/沙美特罗(FP/SAL) Diskus DPI和布地奈德/福莫特罗(BUD/FF) Turbuhaler DPI的肺沉积情况。通过经过验证的功能呼吸成像(FRI)和计算流体动力学(CFD)方法,在低吸入流速(30和40 L/min)下估计胸内(外周和中央)肺沉积。结果:BDP/FF NEXThaler和BDP/FF pMDI胸内沉积的中位数百分比最高,其平均值分别约为50%和40%。BDP/FF NEXThaler和pMDI吸入器外周沉积的中位数百分比在30%以上,FP/SAL Diskus在两种流速下均为5%或更低,BUD/FF Turbuhaler DPI在流速为30和40 L/min时分别为12%和22%。结论:与非精制FP/SAL Discus和BUD/FF dpi相比,使用NEXThaler和pMDI的外精制BDP/FF导致吸入皮质类固醇和长效β激动剂部分的外周沉积更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信