Use of posterior probabilities from a long short-term memory network for characterizing dance behavior with multiple accelerometers.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Aston K McCullough
{"title":"Use of posterior probabilities from a long short-term memory network for characterizing dance behavior with multiple accelerometers.","authors":"Aston K McCullough","doi":"10.1177/13872877251336482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDancing may be protective for cognitive health among adults with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease or dementia; however, additional methods are needed to characterize motor behavior quality in studies of dance.ObjectiveTo determine how long each of a range of motor behaviors should be observed to optimize the reliability of \"dance-like state\" (DLS) scores-a novel metric for characterizing motor behavior quality in reference to free-form dancing using accelerometry.MethodsAdults (<i>n</i> = 41) wore five triaxial accelerometers (on both wrists, both ankles, and the waist) while engaged in sitting, standing, walking, and free-form dancing in a laboratory. Accelerometer data were used as predictors in a long short-term memory (LSTM) network, where the target was the binary coded observed behavior (dancing/not dancing) over time. LSTM accuracy was evaluated, and the Spearman-Brown (SB) Prophecy formula was used to determine the number of 1-min observational periods required to reach sufficient reliability (<i>r</i> ≥ 0.80) when using DLS scores.ResultsThe LSTM network trained with accelerometer data that were collected using all five devices showed very good to excellent classification accuracy (95% confidence interval: 89.1% to 94.0%) in the task of recognizing free-form dance behavior. SB results showed LSTM-generated posterior probabilities are reliable (<i>r</i> > 0.80) when averaged over ≥2 min periods. DLS scores were significantly correlated with age, prior dance training, height, body mass, music tempo and mode, gait speed, and energy expenditure.ConclusionsDLS scores can be used to characterize motor behavior quality. Additional research on motor behavior quality in relation to cognitive health is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251336482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251336482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDancing may be protective for cognitive health among adults with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease or dementia; however, additional methods are needed to characterize motor behavior quality in studies of dance.ObjectiveTo determine how long each of a range of motor behaviors should be observed to optimize the reliability of "dance-like state" (DLS) scores-a novel metric for characterizing motor behavior quality in reference to free-form dancing using accelerometry.MethodsAdults (n = 41) wore five triaxial accelerometers (on both wrists, both ankles, and the waist) while engaged in sitting, standing, walking, and free-form dancing in a laboratory. Accelerometer data were used as predictors in a long short-term memory (LSTM) network, where the target was the binary coded observed behavior (dancing/not dancing) over time. LSTM accuracy was evaluated, and the Spearman-Brown (SB) Prophecy formula was used to determine the number of 1-min observational periods required to reach sufficient reliability (r ≥ 0.80) when using DLS scores.ResultsThe LSTM network trained with accelerometer data that were collected using all five devices showed very good to excellent classification accuracy (95% confidence interval: 89.1% to 94.0%) in the task of recognizing free-form dance behavior. SB results showed LSTM-generated posterior probabilities are reliable (r > 0.80) when averaged over ≥2 min periods. DLS scores were significantly correlated with age, prior dance training, height, body mass, music tempo and mode, gait speed, and energy expenditure.ConclusionsDLS scores can be used to characterize motor behavior quality. Additional research on motor behavior quality in relation to cognitive health is needed.

利用长短期记忆网络的后验概率来描述具有多个加速度计的舞蹈行为。
背景:跳舞可能对患有轻度认知障碍、阿尔茨海默病或痴呆症的成年人的认知健康有保护作用;然而,在舞蹈研究中,需要更多的方法来表征运动行为质量。目的确定“舞蹈样状态”(DLS)评分的可靠性,以优化“舞蹈样状态”(DLS)评分的每一组运动行为的观察时间。DLS是一种利用加速度计表征自由形式舞蹈运动行为质量的新指标。方法41名成人(n = 41)在实验室中进行坐姿、站立、行走和自由形式舞蹈时,分别在双手腕、双脚踝和腰部佩戴5个三轴加速度计。加速度计数据被用作长短期记忆(LSTM)网络的预测因子,其中目标是随时间推移的二进制编码观察行为(跳舞/不跳舞)。评估LSTM的准确性,并使用Spearman-Brown (SB) Prophecy公式来确定使用DLS评分时达到足够信度(r≥0.80)所需的1分钟观测周期数。结果使用五种设备采集的加速度计数据训练的LSTM网络在识别自由形式舞蹈行为的任务中表现出非常好的分类准确率(95%置信区间:89.1% ~ 94.0%)。SB结果表明,lstm生成的后验概率在≥2 min的平均周期内是可靠的(r > 0.80)。DLS得分与年龄、先前舞蹈训练、身高、体重、音乐节奏和模式、步态速度和能量消耗显著相关。结论sdls评分可用于评价运动行为质量。需要进一步研究运动行为质量与认知健康的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信