Assessment of Learning Curve for Radiofrequency Ablation in Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence: A Simulation Model Study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1002/pd.6801
Tanchanok Chaiperm, Nisarat Phithakwatchara, Katika Nawapun, Sommai Viboonchart, Suparat Jaingam, Kanokwaroon Watananirun, Tuangsit Wataganara
{"title":"Assessment of Learning Curve for Radiofrequency Ablation in Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence: A Simulation Model Study.","authors":"Tanchanok Chaiperm, Nisarat Phithakwatchara, Katika Nawapun, Sommai Viboonchart, Suparat Jaingam, Kanokwaroon Watananirun, Tuangsit Wataganara","doi":"10.1002/pd.6801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study characterized the procedural learning curve of novice practitioners in mastering radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a simulated twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS) model.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve novices practiced RFA in a TRAPS model, which was evaluated for validity. A learning curve CUSUM analysis was performed to define the number of procedures required to achieve competency. The learning plateau of needle insertion time and the number of procedures required to surpass 90% of the learning plateau were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall model rating of 4.26 ± 0.58 serves as validating the high learning performance. A success rate of 92.8% was achieved across 767 procedures. The average number of procedures required to achieve technical competency was 29 relative to years of experience in minimally invasive prenatal testing. After reaching this competency level, the success rate improved from 88.2% to 96.7% (P < 0.001). The needle insertion time learning curve indicated that 90% of the learning plateau was reached after 21 procedures, with the learning plateau occurring at 27.5s.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Performance in RFA within the simulated TRAPS model improved over time. Achieving competency enhanced technical success and shortened the needle insertion process. This simulation training provides practical skills for inexperienced surgeons.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>TCTR20221005001.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"805-813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study characterized the procedural learning curve of novice practitioners in mastering radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a simulated twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS) model.

Method: Twelve novices practiced RFA in a TRAPS model, which was evaluated for validity. A learning curve CUSUM analysis was performed to define the number of procedures required to achieve competency. The learning plateau of needle insertion time and the number of procedures required to surpass 90% of the learning plateau were calculated.

Results: The overall model rating of 4.26 ± 0.58 serves as validating the high learning performance. A success rate of 92.8% was achieved across 767 procedures. The average number of procedures required to achieve technical competency was 29 relative to years of experience in minimally invasive prenatal testing. After reaching this competency level, the success rate improved from 88.2% to 96.7% (P < 0.001). The needle insertion time learning curve indicated that 90% of the learning plateau was reached after 21 procedures, with the learning plateau occurring at 27.5s.

Conclusion: Performance in RFA within the simulated TRAPS model improved over time. Achieving competency enhanced technical success and shortened the needle insertion process. This simulation training provides practical skills for inexperienced surgeons.

Trial registration: TCTR20221005001.

双动脉灌注序列射频消融学习曲线的评估:模拟模型研究。
目的:研究新手在模拟双动脉反向灌注序列(TRAPS)模型中掌握射频消融(RFA)的程序学习曲线。方法:12名新手在TRAPS模型中练习RFA,并对其有效性进行评估。进行学习曲线CUSUM分析,以确定达到胜任能力所需的程序数量。计算插针时间的学习平台和超过90%学习平台所需的手术次数。结果:整体模型评分为4.26±0.58,验证了高学习成绩。767例手术的成功率为92.8%。达到技术能力所需的平均程序数相对于在微创产前检测方面的多年经验为29。在达到这个能力水平后,成功率从88.2%提高到96.7% (P结论:在模拟的TRAPS模型中,RFA的表现随着时间的推移而提高。实现竞争力提高了技术上的成功,缩短了针头插入过程。这种模拟训练为没有经验的外科医生提供实用技能。试验注册号:TCTR20221005001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信