A Machine Learning Pipeline for Automated Bolus Segmentation and Area Measurement in Swallowing Videofluoroscopy Images of an Infant Pig Model.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Max Sarmet, Elska Kaczmarek, Alexane Fauveau, Kendall Steer, Alex-Ann Velasco, Ani Smith, Maressa Kennedy, Hannah Shideler, Skyler Wallace, Thomas Stroud, Morgan Blilie, Christopher J Mayerl
{"title":"A Machine Learning Pipeline for Automated Bolus Segmentation and Area Measurement in Swallowing Videofluoroscopy Images of an Infant Pig Model.","authors":"Max Sarmet, Elska Kaczmarek, Alexane Fauveau, Kendall Steer, Alex-Ann Velasco, Ani Smith, Maressa Kennedy, Hannah Shideler, Skyler Wallace, Thomas Stroud, Morgan Blilie, Christopher J Mayerl","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10829-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feeding efficiency and safety are often driven by bolus volume, which is one of the most common clinical measures of assessing swallow performance. However, manual measurement of bolus area is time-consuming and suffers from high levels of inter-rater variability. This study proposes a machine learning (ML) pipeline using ilastik, an accessible bioimage analysis tool, to automate the measurement of bolus area during swallowing. The pipeline was tested on 336 swallows from videofluoroscopic recordings of 8 infant pigs during bottle feeding. Eight trained raters manually measured bolus area in ImageJ and also used ilastik's autocontext pixel-level labeling and object classification tools to train ML models for automated bolus segmentation and area calculation. The ML pipeline trained in 1h42min and processed the dataset in 2 min 48s, a 97% time saving compared to manual methods. The model exhibited strong performance, achieving a high Dice Similarity Coefficient (0.84), Intersection over Union (0.76), and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79). The bolus areas from the two methods were highly correlated (R² = 0.74 overall, 0.78 without bubbles, 0.67 with bubbles), with no significant difference in measured bolus area between the methods. Our ML pipeline, requiring no ML expertise, offers a reliable and efficient method for automatically measuring bolus area. While human confirmation remains valuable, this pipeline accelerates analysis and improves reproducibility compared to manual methods. Future refinements can further enhance precision and broaden its application in dysphagia research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10829-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feeding efficiency and safety are often driven by bolus volume, which is one of the most common clinical measures of assessing swallow performance. However, manual measurement of bolus area is time-consuming and suffers from high levels of inter-rater variability. This study proposes a machine learning (ML) pipeline using ilastik, an accessible bioimage analysis tool, to automate the measurement of bolus area during swallowing. The pipeline was tested on 336 swallows from videofluoroscopic recordings of 8 infant pigs during bottle feeding. Eight trained raters manually measured bolus area in ImageJ and also used ilastik's autocontext pixel-level labeling and object classification tools to train ML models for automated bolus segmentation and area calculation. The ML pipeline trained in 1h42min and processed the dataset in 2 min 48s, a 97% time saving compared to manual methods. The model exhibited strong performance, achieving a high Dice Similarity Coefficient (0.84), Intersection over Union (0.76), and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79). The bolus areas from the two methods were highly correlated (R² = 0.74 overall, 0.78 without bubbles, 0.67 with bubbles), with no significant difference in measured bolus area between the methods. Our ML pipeline, requiring no ML expertise, offers a reliable and efficient method for automatically measuring bolus area. While human confirmation remains valuable, this pipeline accelerates analysis and improves reproducibility compared to manual methods. Future refinements can further enhance precision and broaden its application in dysphagia research.

一种用于婴儿猪模型吞咽视频透视图像自动分割和面积测量的机器学习管道。
喂养效率和安全性通常由丸量驱动,这是评估吞咽性能的最常见临床措施之一。然而,人工测量丸面积是费时的,并遭受高水平的变异性。本研究提出了一种使用ilastik(一种可访问的生物图像分析工具)的机器学习(ML)管道,以自动测量吞咽过程中的丸面积。该管道在8只哺乳仔猪的336只燕子身上进行了测试。8名训练好的评分员在ImageJ中手动测量丸子面积,并使用ilastik的自动上下文像素级标记和对象分类工具来训练ML模型,用于自动丸子分割和面积计算。机器学习管道的训练时间为1小时42分钟,处理数据集的时间为2分钟48秒,与手动方法相比节省了97%的时间。该模型表现出较强的性能,具有较高的骰子相似系数(0.84)、交集大于联合(0.76)和评分间信度(类内相关系数= 0.79)。两种方法测量的丸面积高度相关(总体R²= 0.74,无气泡R²= 0.78,有气泡R²= 0.67),两种方法测量的丸面积无显著差异。我们的ML管道,不需要ML专业知识,提供了一个可靠和有效的方法来自动测量丸面积。虽然人工确认仍然有价值,但与手动方法相比,该管道加速了分析并提高了可重复性。未来的改进可以进一步提高精度,扩大其在吞咽困难研究中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信