Diagnostic Utility of Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) and p16 Immunohistochemistry in Distinguishing Genital Melanomas From Benign Melanocytic Proliferations.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
American Journal of Dermatopathology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1097/DAD.0000000000002977
Petro Vavrukh, Robert E LeBlanc, Shaofeng Yan
{"title":"Diagnostic Utility of Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) and p16 Immunohistochemistry in Distinguishing Genital Melanomas From Benign Melanocytic Proliferations.","authors":"Petro Vavrukh, Robert E LeBlanc, Shaofeng Yan","doi":"10.1097/DAD.0000000000002977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) expression is valuable for distinguishing malignant from benign melanocytic proliferations, and p16 has also been shown to aid in this distinction. However, data on the utility of these two immunohistochemistry stains in genital melanocytic lesions are limited. We retrospectively analyzed 56 genital melanocytic lesions, including 41 benign lesions and 15 melanomas (6 in situ and 9 invasive) with PRAME and p16 immunohistochemistry. All melanomas exhibited extensive PRAME positivity: 93.3% (14 of 15) had a 4+ score (>75% positive cells) and 1 had a 3+ score (51%-75% positive cells). In contrast, 87.8% (36 of 41) of benign lesions were PRAME negative, and none scored higher than 2+ (26%-50% positive cells). Using a 4+ cutoff, PRAME demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 100%. Lowering the cutoff to 3+ increased sensitivity to 100%. Complete or partial loss of p16 was observed in 60.0% (9 of 15) of melanomas but not in any benign lesions (0 of 41), resulting in a sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 100%. Our findings indicate that PRAME immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific for genital melanoma. Loss of p16 expression, although not sensitive, is highly specific for genital melanomas and is, therefore, useful in challenging genital melanocytic lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50967,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","volume":" ","pages":"462-467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000002977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) expression is valuable for distinguishing malignant from benign melanocytic proliferations, and p16 has also been shown to aid in this distinction. However, data on the utility of these two immunohistochemistry stains in genital melanocytic lesions are limited. We retrospectively analyzed 56 genital melanocytic lesions, including 41 benign lesions and 15 melanomas (6 in situ and 9 invasive) with PRAME and p16 immunohistochemistry. All melanomas exhibited extensive PRAME positivity: 93.3% (14 of 15) had a 4+ score (>75% positive cells) and 1 had a 3+ score (51%-75% positive cells). In contrast, 87.8% (36 of 41) of benign lesions were PRAME negative, and none scored higher than 2+ (26%-50% positive cells). Using a 4+ cutoff, PRAME demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 100%. Lowering the cutoff to 3+ increased sensitivity to 100%. Complete or partial loss of p16 was observed in 60.0% (9 of 15) of melanomas but not in any benign lesions (0 of 41), resulting in a sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 100%. Our findings indicate that PRAME immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific for genital melanoma. Loss of p16 expression, although not sensitive, is highly specific for genital melanomas and is, therefore, useful in challenging genital melanocytic lesions.

黑色素瘤中优先表达抗原(PRAME)和p16免疫组织化学在区分生殖器黑色素瘤和良性黑色素细胞增生中的诊断价值。
摘要:黑色素瘤中优先表达抗原(PRAME)的表达对于区分恶性和良性黑色素细胞增殖是有价值的,p16也被证明有助于这种区分。然而,这两种免疫组织化学染色在生殖器黑色素细胞病变中的应用数据是有限的。我们回顾性分析了56个生殖器黑色素细胞病变,包括41个良性病变和15个黑色素瘤(6个原位,9个侵袭性),PRAME和p16免疫组化。所有黑色素瘤均表现出广泛的PRAME阳性:93.3%(14 / 15)为4+分(75%的细胞呈阳性),1例为3+分(51%-75%的细胞呈阳性)。相比之下,41例良性病变中有36例(87.8%)为PRAME阴性,评分均不高于2+(26%-50%为阳性细胞)。使用4+截断,PRAME的敏感性为93.3%,特异性为100%。将截止值降低到3+将灵敏度提高到100%。p16的完全或部分缺失出现在60.0%(15 / 9)的黑色素瘤中,但未出现在任何良性病变中(41 / 0),敏感性为60.0%,特异性为100%。我们的研究结果表明PRAME免疫组化对生殖器黑色素瘤具有高度敏感性和特异性。p16表达缺失虽然不敏感,但对生殖器黑色素瘤具有高度特异性,因此在挑战生殖器黑色素细胞病变时是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dermatopathology offers outstanding coverage of the latest diagnostic approaches and laboratory techniques, as well as insights into contemporary social, legal, and ethical concerns. Each issue features review articles on clinical, technical, and basic science advances and illuminating, detailed case reports. With the The American Journal of Dermatopathology you''ll be able to: -Incorporate step-by-step coverage of new or difficult-to-diagnose conditions from their earliest histopathologic signs to confirmatory immunohistochemical and molecular studies. -Apply the latest basic science findings and clinical approaches to your work right away. -Tap into the skills and expertise of your peers and colleagues the world over peer-reviewed original articles, "Extraordinary cases reports", coverage of practical guidelines, and graphic presentations. -Expand your horizons through the Journal''s idea-generating forum for debating controversial issues and learning from preeminent researchers and clinicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信