Cognitive test performance and disease progression in primary and secondary progressive MS: An analysis of the SPRINT-MS study.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Multiple Sclerosis Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1177/13524585251335213
Victoria M Leavitt, Robert Fox, Jop Mostert, Miguel D'Haeseleer, Ester Moral, Luis Brieva-Ruiz, Pavle Repovic, James D Bowen, Jacynthe Comtois, Bernard Uitdehaag, Eva Strijbis, Gary Cutter, Marcus W Koch
{"title":"Cognitive test performance and disease progression in primary and secondary progressive MS: An analysis of the SPRINT-MS study.","authors":"Victoria M Leavitt, Robert Fox, Jop Mostert, Miguel D'Haeseleer, Ester Moral, Luis Brieva-Ruiz, Pavle Repovic, James D Bowen, Jacynthe Comtois, Bernard Uitdehaag, Eva Strijbis, Gary Cutter, Marcus W Koch","doi":"10.1177/13524585251335213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) increasingly incorporate cognitive outcomes, although effects of DMTs on cognition remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis of data from SPRINT-MS, a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial of ibudilast for progressive MS, we evaluated performance on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and Selective Reminding Test (SRT) in relation to physical disability, brain volume assessed with magnetic resonance imaging, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness over 96-week follow-up. We hypothesize that trial participants would show a decline in cognitive test scores over 96 weeks of follow-up, with a possible between-group difference in favor of ibudilast.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 255 participants were analyzed. On average, physical outcome measures, brain parenchymal fraction, and RNFL thickness worsened; average SDMT and SRT scores remained largely unchanged. There were no differences between treatment groups in cognitive outcomes at 96-week follow-up. Practice effects likely contributed to results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Observed stability of cognitive scores in individuals with progressive MS over 96-week follow-up may reflect true cognitive stability. However, the possibility that current cognitive measurement instruments are psychometrically flawed remains, warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"866-876"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251335213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) increasingly incorporate cognitive outcomes, although effects of DMTs on cognition remain unknown.

Methods: In this secondary analysis of data from SPRINT-MS, a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial of ibudilast for progressive MS, we evaluated performance on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and Selective Reminding Test (SRT) in relation to physical disability, brain volume assessed with magnetic resonance imaging, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness over 96-week follow-up. We hypothesize that trial participants would show a decline in cognitive test scores over 96 weeks of follow-up, with a possible between-group difference in favor of ibudilast.

Results: Data from 255 participants were analyzed. On average, physical outcome measures, brain parenchymal fraction, and RNFL thickness worsened; average SDMT and SRT scores remained largely unchanged. There were no differences between treatment groups in cognitive outcomes at 96-week follow-up. Practice effects likely contributed to results.

Conclusions: Observed stability of cognitive scores in individuals with progressive MS over 96-week follow-up may reflect true cognitive stability. However, the possibility that current cognitive measurement instruments are psychometrically flawed remains, warranting further research.

原发性和继发性进展性多发性硬化症的认知测试表现和疾病进展:SPRINT-MS研究分析
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)的疾病改善疗法(dmt)的临床试验越来越多地纳入认知结果,尽管dmt对认知的影响尚不清楚。方法:在这项对SPRINT-MS数据的二次分析中,我们评估了符号数字模式测试(SDMT)和选择性提醒测试(SRT)在96周随访期间与身体残疾、磁共振成像评估的脑容量和视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度的关系。我们假设,在96周的随访中,试验参与者的认知测试分数会出现下降,这可能是支持布司特的组间差异。结果:分析了255名参与者的数据。平均而言,物理结果测量、脑实质分数和RNFL厚度恶化;SDMT和SRT的平均得分基本保持不变。在96周的随访中,两组之间的认知结果没有差异。练习效果可能对结果有影响。结论:在96周的随访中观察到的进展性MS个体认知评分的稳定性可能反映了真正的认知稳定性。然而,目前的认知测量工具在心理测量学上存在缺陷的可能性仍然存在,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信