Welfare assessment of racehorses provides a baseline for continued monitoring.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Rachel Annan, Leah Trigg, Kate Allen, Joanna Hockenhull, Mathilde Valenchon, Siobhan Mullan
{"title":"Welfare assessment of racehorses provides a baseline for continued monitoring.","authors":"Rachel Annan, Leah Trigg, Kate Allen, Joanna Hockenhull, Mathilde Valenchon, Siobhan Mullan","doi":"10.1111/evj.14510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racehorse welfare continues to be a focus of stakeholders both within and outside of the industry, and there is a need for evidence-based animal welfare data.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To gather data on racehorse welfare through a combination of animal-based observations and information about management practices, and to ascertain the feasibility of trained industry assessors carrying out a racehorse welfare assessment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen trained industry assessors conducted individual observations of 737 racehorses in 21 Flat racing (F), 27 National Hunt (NH) and 26 Dual-purpose (D) training yards in Great Britain (GB). The welfare assessment protocol, including management and animal-based welfare measures, was carried out on up to 10 horses in each yard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Horses were generally in good physical health, although external mouth corner lesions were reported in 18% of horses, with significant variation between yards (p ≤ 0.001). Forage was present in the stable of 86% of horses during the assessment. Daily turnout was available to 27% of all horses, and 55% of horses were reported to be turned out at least weekly. Of the horses that were turned out, 36% were done so in pairs or groups, and 75% were turned out on grass. In total, 47% of all horses had physical social contact when stabled, with 1% being housed in pairs, but 7% of horses had no visual or physical contact when stabled. In total, 7% of horses performed stereotypic behaviour during the individual welfare assessment. The majority of horses (69%-76%) reacted positively to three human reactivity tests.</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Welfare measures used were constrained by the assessment being carried out on racehorses in an active training and racing schedule. Time available to the assessors was also a limiting factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This welfare assessment of racehorses in training in GB proved feasible to conduct and provided large-scale data to monitor welfare and highlight areas for targeted welfare improvement strategies. Depending on the ultimate objectives, various implementation options for continued welfare assessments of racehorses are available, working in partnership with trainers and other industry stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Racehorse welfare continues to be a focus of stakeholders both within and outside of the industry, and there is a need for evidence-based animal welfare data.

Objectives: To gather data on racehorse welfare through a combination of animal-based observations and information about management practices, and to ascertain the feasibility of trained industry assessors carrying out a racehorse welfare assessment.

Study design: Cross-sectional.

Methods: Sixteen trained industry assessors conducted individual observations of 737 racehorses in 21 Flat racing (F), 27 National Hunt (NH) and 26 Dual-purpose (D) training yards in Great Britain (GB). The welfare assessment protocol, including management and animal-based welfare measures, was carried out on up to 10 horses in each yard.

Results: Horses were generally in good physical health, although external mouth corner lesions were reported in 18% of horses, with significant variation between yards (p ≤ 0.001). Forage was present in the stable of 86% of horses during the assessment. Daily turnout was available to 27% of all horses, and 55% of horses were reported to be turned out at least weekly. Of the horses that were turned out, 36% were done so in pairs or groups, and 75% were turned out on grass. In total, 47% of all horses had physical social contact when stabled, with 1% being housed in pairs, but 7% of horses had no visual or physical contact when stabled. In total, 7% of horses performed stereotypic behaviour during the individual welfare assessment. The majority of horses (69%-76%) reacted positively to three human reactivity tests.

Main limitations: Welfare measures used were constrained by the assessment being carried out on racehorses in an active training and racing schedule. Time available to the assessors was also a limiting factor.

Conclusions: This welfare assessment of racehorses in training in GB proved feasible to conduct and provided large-scale data to monitor welfare and highlight areas for targeted welfare improvement strategies. Depending on the ultimate objectives, various implementation options for continued welfare assessments of racehorses are available, working in partnership with trainers and other industry stakeholders.

对赛马的福利评估为继续监测提供了基线。
背景:赛马福利一直是行业内外利益相关者关注的焦点,需要基于证据的动物福利数据。目的:通过结合动物观察和管理实践信息来收集赛马福利数据,并确定训练有素的行业评估人员进行赛马福利评估的可行性。研究设计:横断面。方法:16名训练有素的行业评估员对英国21个平地赛马场(F)、27个国家狩猎场(NH)和26个双重用途训练场(D)的737匹赛马进行了单独观察。福利评估协议,包括管理和动物福利措施,在每个院子里对多达10匹马进行了评估。结果:马总体身体健康状况良好,尽管18%的马报告有口腔外角病变,在不同场次之间存在显著差异(p≤0.001)。在评估期间,86%的马的马厩中有饲料。27%的马每天都有参加,55%的马至少每周参加一次。在被赶出去的马中,36%是成对或成群的,75%是在草地上赶出去的。总的来说,47%的马在马厩里有身体上的社会接触,1%的马是成对的,但7%的马在马厩里没有视觉或身体上的接触。总体而言,7%的马在个体福利评估中表现出刻板印象行为。大多数马(69%-76%)对三次人类反应性测试反应积极。主要限制:所使用的福利措施受到在积极训练和比赛时间表中对赛马进行的评估的限制。评估人员可用的时间也是一个限制因素。结论:这项对英国赛马训练中的福利评估证明是可行的,并提供了大规模的数据来监测福利,并突出了有针对性的福利改善策略。根据最终目标,与驯马师和其他行业利益相关者合作,提供了对赛马进行持续福利评估的各种实施方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信