Perceived stress and coping strategies among undergraduate nursing students in the psychiatric practicum during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional quantitative study.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_132_24
Shiou-Fang Lu, Shu-Wan Chiang, Ya-Chuan Hsu
{"title":"Perceived stress and coping strategies among undergraduate nursing students in the psychiatric practicum during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional quantitative study.","authors":"Shiou-Fang Lu, Shu-Wan Chiang, Ya-Chuan Hsu","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_132_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore perceived stress and coping strategies among undergraduate nursing students in the psychiatric practicum during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional quantitative design was employed in this study. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires consisting of demographic variables, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Coping Behavior Inventory (CBI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 73 participants, 82.2% were women. The mean age was 21.25 ± 0.69 years. The overall mean score of PSS was 1.45 ± 0.48, and that of CBI was 1.93 ± 0.31. The major sources of perceived stress were taking care of patients (1.72 ± 0.54) and assignments and workload (1.72 ± 0.75). The major coping strategies to deal with stress were problem-solving (2.66 ± 0.52) and staying optimistic (2.43 ± 0.73). Pearson's correlation analyses revealed that participants who utilized the avoidance strategy (<i>r</i> = 0.416) reported high-stress levels, whereas participants who utilized problem-solving (<i>r</i> = -0.306) and staying optimistic (<i>r</i> = -0.527) reported low-stress levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nursing students perceived moderate stress mainly from taking care of patients as well as assignments and workload. Problem-solving and staying optimistic were the most frequently used coping strategies. Compared with findings from other studies, our data suggested that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived stress was not apparent possibly due to well-established approaches and education for infection prevention and control in our hospitals and schools. Our findings may provide valuable information to maximize students' learning opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"37 2","pages":"216-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_132_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore perceived stress and coping strategies among undergraduate nursing students in the psychiatric practicum during the pandemic.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional quantitative design was employed in this study. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires consisting of demographic variables, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Coping Behavior Inventory (CBI).

Results: Of the 73 participants, 82.2% were women. The mean age was 21.25 ± 0.69 years. The overall mean score of PSS was 1.45 ± 0.48, and that of CBI was 1.93 ± 0.31. The major sources of perceived stress were taking care of patients (1.72 ± 0.54) and assignments and workload (1.72 ± 0.75). The major coping strategies to deal with stress were problem-solving (2.66 ± 0.52) and staying optimistic (2.43 ± 0.73). Pearson's correlation analyses revealed that participants who utilized the avoidance strategy (r = 0.416) reported high-stress levels, whereas participants who utilized problem-solving (r = -0.306) and staying optimistic (r = -0.527) reported low-stress levels.

Conclusion: The nursing students perceived moderate stress mainly from taking care of patients as well as assignments and workload. Problem-solving and staying optimistic were the most frequently used coping strategies. Compared with findings from other studies, our data suggested that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived stress was not apparent possibly due to well-established approaches and education for infection prevention and control in our hospitals and schools. Our findings may provide valuable information to maximize students' learning opportunities.

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间精神科本科护生压力感知及应对策略的横断面定量研究
目的:本研究旨在探讨大流行期间精神科本科护生的压力感知及应对策略。材料与方法:本研究采用横断面定量设计。数据通过人口统计学变量、感知压力量表(PSS)和应对行为量表(CBI)组成的自填问卷收集。结果:73名参与者中,82.2%为女性。平均年龄21.25±0.69岁。PSS评分为1.45±0.48分,CBI评分为1.93±0.31分。感知压力的主要来源是照顾病人(1.72±0.54)和作业和工作量(1.72±0.75)。主要的应激应对策略为解决问题(2.66±0.52)和保持乐观(2.43±0.73)。皮尔逊相关分析显示,使用回避策略的参与者(r = 0.416)报告了高压力水平,而使用解决问题策略(r = -0.306)和保持乐观(r = -0.527)的参与者报告了低压力水平。结论:护生感受到的压力主要来自于照顾病人、工作任务和工作量。解决问题和保持乐观是最常用的应对策略。与其他研究结果相比,我们的数据表明,COVID-19大流行对感知压力的影响并不明显,这可能是由于我们的医院和学校建立了完善的感染预防和控制方法和教育。我们的研究结果可能提供有价值的信息,以最大限度地提高学生的学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信