Is Cystoscopic Intravesical Injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA Acceptable in an Outpatient Clinic?

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Neurourology Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.5213/inj.2448392.196
Thomas James Curtis, Michelle Drolet, Thomas Giles Gray, Ilias Giarenis
{"title":"Is Cystoscopic Intravesical Injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA Acceptable in an Outpatient Clinic?","authors":"Thomas James Curtis, Michelle Drolet, Thomas Giles Gray, Ilias Giarenis","doi":"10.5213/inj.2448392.196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for refractory overactive bladder. While the procedure can be performed in outpatient clinics under local anesthetic, some clinicians still use sedation or general anesthesia in an operating theatre. Our study aimed to assess acceptability of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection versus widely accepted diagnostic cystoscopy in the outpatient setting via the medium of patient experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-item patient experience survey was administered following diagnostic cystoscopy or intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection in an outpatient clinic. Both procedures were performed using a flexible cystoscope with local anesthetic gel. A visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed intraprocedure pain. Dichotomous questions assessed whether significant pain or postprocedure symptoms were experienced and if these required medical attention. A free-text question assessed which symptoms had occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred responses from 188 patients were received (53.2% response rate). Sixty-eight patients underwent cystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection and 32 diagnostic cystoscopy. Mean VAS scores were higher for onabotulinumtoxinA injection (24 of 100) than diagnostic cystoscopy (11 of 100) (P=0.002). VAS scores were higher among patients reporting preprocedure anxiety (31 of 100 vs. 14 of 100, P=0.0013). Twenty-four percent of onabotulinumtoxinA injection patients experienced symptoms postprocedure versus 41% for cystoscopy. Medical attention was sought more frequently in the diagnostic cystoscopy group (9.4% vs. 1.5%). Common symptoms following both procedures were dysuria, urinary frequency, urgency, abdominal pain and urine discoloration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cystoscopic intravesical injection of onabotulinumtoxinA appears more painful than diagnostic cystoscopy. However, as VAS scores were relatively low, this is unlikely to represent clinically significant discomfort burdensome to the patient. There were no significant complications postprocedure. Cystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection is acceptable in an outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14466,"journal":{"name":"International Neurourology Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Neurourology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2448392.196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for refractory overactive bladder. While the procedure can be performed in outpatient clinics under local anesthetic, some clinicians still use sedation or general anesthesia in an operating theatre. Our study aimed to assess acceptability of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection versus widely accepted diagnostic cystoscopy in the outpatient setting via the medium of patient experience.

Methods: A 16-item patient experience survey was administered following diagnostic cystoscopy or intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection in an outpatient clinic. Both procedures were performed using a flexible cystoscope with local anesthetic gel. A visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed intraprocedure pain. Dichotomous questions assessed whether significant pain or postprocedure symptoms were experienced and if these required medical attention. A free-text question assessed which symptoms had occurred.

Results: One hundred responses from 188 patients were received (53.2% response rate). Sixty-eight patients underwent cystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection and 32 diagnostic cystoscopy. Mean VAS scores were higher for onabotulinumtoxinA injection (24 of 100) than diagnostic cystoscopy (11 of 100) (P=0.002). VAS scores were higher among patients reporting preprocedure anxiety (31 of 100 vs. 14 of 100, P=0.0013). Twenty-four percent of onabotulinumtoxinA injection patients experienced symptoms postprocedure versus 41% for cystoscopy. Medical attention was sought more frequently in the diagnostic cystoscopy group (9.4% vs. 1.5%). Common symptoms following both procedures were dysuria, urinary frequency, urgency, abdominal pain and urine discoloration.

Conclusion: Cystoscopic intravesical injection of onabotulinumtoxinA appears more painful than diagnostic cystoscopy. However, as VAS scores were relatively low, this is unlikely to represent clinically significant discomfort burdensome to the patient. There were no significant complications postprocedure. Cystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection is acceptable in an outpatient setting.

门诊接受膀胱镜下膀胱内注射肉毒杆菌毒素吗?
目的:膀胱镜下膀胱内注射肉毒杆菌毒素是一种安全有效的微创治疗顽固性膀胱过动症的方法。虽然手术可以在局部麻醉下在门诊诊所进行,但一些临床医生仍然在手术室使用镇静或全身麻醉。我们的研究旨在通过患者经验评估膀胱内注射肉毒杆菌毒素与广泛接受的门诊诊断性膀胱镜检查的可接受性。方法:在门诊进行诊断性膀胱镜检查或膀胱内注射肉毒杆菌毒素后进行16项患者体验调查。这两种手术都是在软性膀胱镜和局部麻醉凝胶下进行的。视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术中疼痛。两分法问题评估患者是否经历过明显的疼痛或术后症状,以及是否需要就医。一个自由文本问题评估了出现了哪些症状。结果:188例患者共获得应答100例,应答率53.2%。68例患者行膀胱内注射肉毒杆菌毒素,32例行诊断性膀胱镜检查。注射肉毒杆菌毒素的VAS平均评分(24 / 100)高于诊断性膀胱镜检查(11 / 100)(P=0.002)。报告术前焦虑的患者VAS评分较高(100人中有31人比100人中有14人,P=0.0013)。24%的肉毒杆菌毒素注射患者术后出现症状,而膀胱镜检查患者的这一比例为41%。诊断性膀胱镜检查组寻求医疗护理的频率更高(9.4%比1.5%)。两种手术后的常见症状是排尿困难、尿频、尿急、腹痛和尿液变色。结论:膀胱镜下膀胱内注射肉毒杆菌毒素a比诊断性膀胱镜检查更痛苦。然而,由于VAS评分相对较低,这不太可能代表临床显著的不适给患者带来负担。术后无明显并发症。膀胱镜下膀胱内注射肉毒杆菌毒素在门诊是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Neurourology Journal
International Neurourology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
41
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Neurourology Journal (Int Neurourol J, INJ) is a quarterly international journal that publishes high-quality research papers that provide the most significant and promising achievements in the fields of clinical neurourology and fundamental science. Specifically, fundamental science includes the most influential research papers from all fields of science and technology, revolutionizing what physicians and researchers practicing the art of neurourology worldwide know. Thus, we welcome valuable basic research articles to introduce cutting-edge translational research of fundamental sciences to clinical neurourology. In the editorials, urologists will present their perspectives on these articles. The original mission statement of the INJ was published on October 12, 1997. INJ provides authors a fast review of their work and makes a decision in an average of three to four weeks of receiving submissions. If accepted, articles are posted online in fully citable form. Supplementary issues will be published interim to quarterlies, as necessary, to fully allow berth to accept and publish relevant articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信