Domains for inclusion in a novel Treatment Response Measure for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (TRM-SLE): results of a modified Delphi study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Kathryn Connelly, Rachel Koelmeyer, Darshini Ayton, John May, Kate Gregory, Laura E Eades, Raychel Barallon, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake, Vera Golder, Afia Anzum, Maisarah Mydin, Munni Akther, Alan Friedman, Anca D Askanase, Cynthia Aranow, Edward Vital, Guillermo Pons-Estel, Hermine Brunner, Kenneth Kalunian, Khadija Dantata, Laurent Arnaud, Laurie Burke, Lee S Simon, Qing Zuraw, Sandra Garces, Victoria P Werth, Ying B Sun, Yoshiya Tanaka, Youmna Lahoud, Alain Cornet, Alessandro Sorrentino, Anisur Rahman, Anna Stevens, Catherine Barbey, Ida Dzifa Dey, Elaine Karis, Eloisa Bonfá, Erika Noss, Eve M D Smith, George Stojan, Jeanette Andersen, Joseph F Merola, Jorge A Ross Terres, Joy Buie, Justine Maller, Marta Mosca, Maja Hojnik, Maria Dall'Era, Richard A Furie, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Subhashis Banerjee, Eric Morand
{"title":"Domains for inclusion in a novel Treatment Response Measure for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (TRM-SLE): results of a modified Delphi study.","authors":"Kathryn Connelly, Rachel Koelmeyer, Darshini Ayton, John May, Kate Gregory, Laura E Eades, Raychel Barallon, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake, Vera Golder, Afia Anzum, Maisarah Mydin, Munni Akther, Alan Friedman, Anca D Askanase, Cynthia Aranow, Edward Vital, Guillermo Pons-Estel, Hermine Brunner, Kenneth Kalunian, Khadija Dantata, Laurent Arnaud, Laurie Burke, Lee S Simon, Qing Zuraw, Sandra Garces, Victoria P Werth, Ying B Sun, Yoshiya Tanaka, Youmna Lahoud, Alain Cornet, Alessandro Sorrentino, Anisur Rahman, Anna Stevens, Catherine Barbey, Ida Dzifa Dey, Elaine Karis, Eloisa Bonfá, Erika Noss, Eve M D Smith, George Stojan, Jeanette Andersen, Joseph F Merola, Jorge A Ross Terres, Joy Buie, Justine Maller, Marta Mosca, Maja Hojnik, Maria Dall'Era, Richard A Furie, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Subhashis Banerjee, Eric Morand","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To achieve consensus on domains of active disease for inclusion in a novel outcome measure for SLE randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the Treatment Response Measure for SLE (TRM-SLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Domains nominated by TRM-SLE Taskforce members were rated in a two-stage modified Delphi study. Each stage comprised two online survey rounds separated by a structured discussion meeting. In Stage 1, expert lupus clinicians and patient representatives rated domain 'importance' (impact on symptoms, function or survival). In Stage 2, clinicians rated 'important' domains on three characteristics relevant to RCT utility: 'appropriateness' for evaluating change in disease activity, 'representation' in patients with active SLE and 'measurability' in an RCT context. Consensus for domain inclusion was prespecified as all four characteristics achieving a rating ≥7 on a 1-9 scale by ≥70% of participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Domain nominations from 36/59 (61%) TRM-SLE Taskforce members yielded 34 potential domains which were rated in the modified Delphi study. At least one Delphi round was completed by 87 clinicians and 13 patient representatives. In Stage 1, 14 domains met consensus on 'importance' in both clinician and patient groups, and 11 domains met consensus among patients only. After Stage 2, eight of these domains also reached consensus on 'appropriateness', 'representation' and 'measurability': alopecia, arthritis, haemolytic anaemia, nephritis, mucosal ulcers, rash, serositis and thrombocytopenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering patient and clinician perspectives, we reached consensus to include eight disease activity domains for future development into the novel TRM-SLE clinical trial outcome measure, aiming to improve trial interpretability and success.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To achieve consensus on domains of active disease for inclusion in a novel outcome measure for SLE randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the Treatment Response Measure for SLE (TRM-SLE).

Methods: Domains nominated by TRM-SLE Taskforce members were rated in a two-stage modified Delphi study. Each stage comprised two online survey rounds separated by a structured discussion meeting. In Stage 1, expert lupus clinicians and patient representatives rated domain 'importance' (impact on symptoms, function or survival). In Stage 2, clinicians rated 'important' domains on three characteristics relevant to RCT utility: 'appropriateness' for evaluating change in disease activity, 'representation' in patients with active SLE and 'measurability' in an RCT context. Consensus for domain inclusion was prespecified as all four characteristics achieving a rating ≥7 on a 1-9 scale by ≥70% of participants.

Results: Domain nominations from 36/59 (61%) TRM-SLE Taskforce members yielded 34 potential domains which were rated in the modified Delphi study. At least one Delphi round was completed by 87 clinicians and 13 patient representatives. In Stage 1, 14 domains met consensus on 'importance' in both clinician and patient groups, and 11 domains met consensus among patients only. After Stage 2, eight of these domains also reached consensus on 'appropriateness', 'representation' and 'measurability': alopecia, arthritis, haemolytic anaemia, nephritis, mucosal ulcers, rash, serositis and thrombocytopenia.

Conclusions: Considering patient and clinician perspectives, we reached consensus to include eight disease activity domains for future development into the novel TRM-SLE clinical trial outcome measure, aiming to improve trial interpretability and success.

纳入系统性红斑狼疮(TRM-SLE)的新型治疗反应测量的领域:一项修改的德尔菲研究的结果。
目的:就活动性疾病领域达成共识,以纳入SLE随机对照试验(rct)的一项新结果测量,即SLE治疗反应测量(TRM-SLE)。方法:由TRM-SLE工作组成员提名的领域在两阶段改进的德尔菲研究中进行评级。每个阶段包括两轮在线调查,中间有一次结构化的讨论会议。在第一阶段,专家狼疮临床医生和患者代表评估领域的“重要性”(对症状、功能或生存的影响)。在第二阶段,临床医生根据与RCT效用相关的三个特征对“重要”域进行评级:评估疾病活动性变化的“适当性”、活动性SLE患者的“代表性”和RCT背景下的“可测量性”。领域纳入的共识被预先指定为所有四个特征在1-9量表上达到≥7的≥70%的参与者。结果:来自36/59 (61%)TRM-SLE工作组成员的领域提名产生了34个潜在领域,这些领域在改进的德尔菲研究中进行了评级。87名临床医生和13名患者代表完成了至少一轮德尔菲调查。在第一阶段,14个领域在临床医生和患者群体中对“重要性”达成共识,11个领域仅在患者群体中达成共识。在第2阶段之后,这些领域中的8个也在“适当性”、“代表性”和“可测量性”上达成共识:脱发、关节炎、溶血性贫血、肾炎、粘膜溃疡、皮疹、浆液炎和血小板减少症。结论:考虑到患者和临床医生的观点,我们达成共识,将未来发展的八个疾病活动域纳入新的TRM-SLE临床试验结果指标,旨在提高试验的可解释性和成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信