Peripapillary intrachoroidal cavitation in myopic eyes with open-angle glaucoma: association with myopic fundus changes.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jing Huang, Nan Luo, Litong Ye, Lu Cheng, Yuzhou Xiang, Yu Yang, Huawen Lu, Jingjing Huang
{"title":"Peripapillary intrachoroidal cavitation in myopic eyes with open-angle glaucoma: association with myopic fundus changes.","authors":"Jing Huang, Nan Luo, Litong Ye, Lu Cheng, Yuzhou Xiang, Yu Yang, Huawen Lu, Jingjing Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06822-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the clinical characteristics and associated risk factors of peripapillary intrachoroidal cavitation (PICC) in myopic eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, eyes of consecutive participants were categorized into the myopia only group and the myopia with OAG group. PICC was identified by radial scans centered on the optic disc using optical coherence tomography. The myopic maculopathy, optic disc morphology, and visual field defect were also assessed. The prevalence of PICC was compared between the two groups, and risk factors of PICC in the myopia with OAG group were investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 775 enrolled myopic eyes with or without OAG, 58 eyes were found to have PICC. Compared with the myopia only group, the myopia with OAG group had a significantly higher prevalence of PICC (10.4% [44/422] vs 4.0% [14/353]) (P = 0.001). In the myopia with OAG group, participants with PICC were older and showed longer axial length, worse BCVA, more severe myopic fundus changes than those without PICC (all P < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis showed that older age, optic disc tilt, inferior rotation of the optic disc, larger peripapillary atrophy, and posterior staphyloma were risk factors for PICC in the myopia with OAG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PICC was more prevalent in eyes with myopia and coexisting OAG than in eyes with myopia alone. And risk factors for the presence of PICC in eyes with myopia and coexisting OAG were older age and more severe myopic fundus changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06822-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the clinical characteristics and associated risk factors of peripapillary intrachoroidal cavitation (PICC) in myopic eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

Methods: In this study, eyes of consecutive participants were categorized into the myopia only group and the myopia with OAG group. PICC was identified by radial scans centered on the optic disc using optical coherence tomography. The myopic maculopathy, optic disc morphology, and visual field defect were also assessed. The prevalence of PICC was compared between the two groups, and risk factors of PICC in the myopia with OAG group were investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Of 775 enrolled myopic eyes with or without OAG, 58 eyes were found to have PICC. Compared with the myopia only group, the myopia with OAG group had a significantly higher prevalence of PICC (10.4% [44/422] vs 4.0% [14/353]) (P = 0.001). In the myopia with OAG group, participants with PICC were older and showed longer axial length, worse BCVA, more severe myopic fundus changes than those without PICC (all P < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis showed that older age, optic disc tilt, inferior rotation of the optic disc, larger peripapillary atrophy, and posterior staphyloma were risk factors for PICC in the myopia with OAG group.

Conclusion: PICC was more prevalent in eyes with myopia and coexisting OAG than in eyes with myopia alone. And risk factors for the presence of PICC in eyes with myopia and coexisting OAG were older age and more severe myopic fundus changes.

近视伴开角型青光眼的乳头周围脉络膜内空化:与近视眼底改变的关系。
目的:探讨近视伴开角型青光眼(OAG)的乳头周围脉络膜腔内空化(PICC)的临床特点及相关危险因素。方法:本研究将连续受试者的眼睛分为纯近视组和近视伴OAG组。PICC是通过以视盘为中心的径向扫描识别的,使用光学相干断层扫描。评估近视黄斑病变、视盘形态及视野缺损。比较两组间PICC的患病率,并采用多因素logistic回归分析探讨OAG近视组PICC的危险因素。结果:775只有或无OAG的近视眼中,有PICC的有58只眼。与单纯近视组相比,OAG近视组PICC患病率(10.4% [44/422]vs 4.0%[14/353])显著高于单纯近视组(P = 0.001)。在有OAG的近视组中,有PICC的受试者比无PICC的受试者年龄更大,眼轴长度更长,BCVA更差,近视眼底改变更严重(P < 0.01)。多因素回归分析显示,年龄较大、视盘倾斜、视盘下旋、乳头周围萎缩较大、后葡萄肿是OAG近视组发生PICC的危险因素。结论:PICC在近视伴OAG患者中发生率高于单纯近视患者。同时存在OAG的近视眼存在PICC的危险因素是年龄较大和近视眼底改变较严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信