{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound: a viable alternative for assessing ulnar neuropathy in rheumatoid arthritis?","authors":"Adel Azzam, Mohamed Mansy, Abdel Hamid Ghazaly, Hegazy Al-Tamimy","doi":"10.15557/jou.2025.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound measurements of the ulnar nerve cross-sectional area in comparison to electrodiagnostic tests for identifying ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow in rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was designed as a cross-sectional observational analysis involving 90 individuals, divided into three groups: Group A consisted of 30 individuals diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis without clinical signs of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow; Group B included 30 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis exhibiting clinical indicators of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow; and Group C comprised 30 healthy controls. Each participant underwent a thorough medical history assessment, along with both clinical and neurological evaluations. Additionally, ultrasound and electrophysiological assessments of the ulnar nerve were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant demographic difference between the groups, except for age, which was notably lower in Group A compared to Group B. Additionally, abnormalities in nerve conduction studies and cross-sectional area were found to be significantly greater in Group B (<i>p</i> <0.0001). The cross-sectional area demonstrated diagnostic accuracy rates of 52.22%, 62.22%, and 78.89% for identifying ulnar neuropathy at Guyon's canal, the medial epicondyle, and based on the elbow-to-wrist ratio, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasonography exhibits high diagnostic accuracy, especially with the cross-sectional area at the medial epicondyle and the elbow-to-wrist cross-sectional area ratio serving as important indicators for ulnar nerve entrapment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasonography","volume":"25 101","pages":"20250013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2025.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim of the study: This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound measurements of the ulnar nerve cross-sectional area in comparison to electrodiagnostic tests for identifying ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow in rheumatoid arthritis.
Patients and methods: This study was designed as a cross-sectional observational analysis involving 90 individuals, divided into three groups: Group A consisted of 30 individuals diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis without clinical signs of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow; Group B included 30 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis exhibiting clinical indicators of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow; and Group C comprised 30 healthy controls. Each participant underwent a thorough medical history assessment, along with both clinical and neurological evaluations. Additionally, ultrasound and electrophysiological assessments of the ulnar nerve were performed.
Results: There was no significant demographic difference between the groups, except for age, which was notably lower in Group A compared to Group B. Additionally, abnormalities in nerve conduction studies and cross-sectional area were found to be significantly greater in Group B (p <0.0001). The cross-sectional area demonstrated diagnostic accuracy rates of 52.22%, 62.22%, and 78.89% for identifying ulnar neuropathy at Guyon's canal, the medial epicondyle, and based on the elbow-to-wrist ratio, respectively.
Conclusion: Ultrasonography exhibits high diagnostic accuracy, especially with the cross-sectional area at the medial epicondyle and the elbow-to-wrist cross-sectional area ratio serving as important indicators for ulnar nerve entrapment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.