Prevalence and morphology of corona mortis: a systematic study with routine abdominopelvic computed tomography.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Rabia Mihriban Kilinc, Nizamettin Emre Ozen
{"title":"Prevalence and morphology of corona mortis: a systematic study with routine abdominopelvic computed tomography.","authors":"Rabia Mihriban Kilinc, Nizamettin Emre Ozen","doi":"10.5603/fm.103862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the prevalence, morphology, and anatomical characteristics of corona mortis (CMOR) using routine portal-phase contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Corona mortis is defined as the anastomoses between the external iliac and inferior epigastric vessels and the obturator vascular structures. Accidental injury of these vascular connections during surgical operations or damage from pelvic trauma can lead to difficult-to-control pelvic hemorrhages.</p><p><strong>Matherials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 1593 abdominopelvic CT scans performed between January and April 2023. Patients' demographics, CMOR prevalence, morphology, and measurements-including vessel diameter and distance from the pubic symphysis-were analyzed. CMOR was classified using the Rusu classification system, and arterial and venous anastomoses were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMOR was identified in 49.3% of patients. Venous CMOR was observed in 34% of cases, and arterial CMOR was detected in 7.1%, with 5.8% of patients exhibiting combined arterial and venous anastomoses. Venous vessel diameters averaged 3.1 mm on the right and 3.2 mm on the left, with significant sex-based differences (p=0.001). The distance from the pubic symphysis to venous CMOR averaged 63 mm. Most arterial anastomoses were Type 1-2 (89.4%), and venous anastomoses were predominantly Type 2-1 (72%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine portal-phase CT effectively identifies and classifies CMOR, providing valuable preoperative information. Bilateral and contralateral anastomoses are frequent, highlighting the need for detailed anatomical evaluation to reduce surgical complications. Future studies could enhance detection with advanced imaging techniques such as 3D reconstructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12251,"journal":{"name":"Folia morphologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia morphologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.103862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the prevalence, morphology, and anatomical characteristics of corona mortis (CMOR) using routine portal-phase contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Corona mortis is defined as the anastomoses between the external iliac and inferior epigastric vessels and the obturator vascular structures. Accidental injury of these vascular connections during surgical operations or damage from pelvic trauma can lead to difficult-to-control pelvic hemorrhages.

Matherials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 1593 abdominopelvic CT scans performed between January and April 2023. Patients' demographics, CMOR prevalence, morphology, and measurements-including vessel diameter and distance from the pubic symphysis-were analyzed. CMOR was classified using the Rusu classification system, and arterial and venous anastomoses were documented.

Results: CMOR was identified in 49.3% of patients. Venous CMOR was observed in 34% of cases, and arterial CMOR was detected in 7.1%, with 5.8% of patients exhibiting combined arterial and venous anastomoses. Venous vessel diameters averaged 3.1 mm on the right and 3.2 mm on the left, with significant sex-based differences (p=0.001). The distance from the pubic symphysis to venous CMOR averaged 63 mm. Most arterial anastomoses were Type 1-2 (89.4%), and venous anastomoses were predominantly Type 2-1 (72%).

Conclusion: Routine portal-phase CT effectively identifies and classifies CMOR, providing valuable preoperative information. Bilateral and contralateral anastomoses are frequent, highlighting the need for detailed anatomical evaluation to reduce surgical complications. Future studies could enhance detection with advanced imaging techniques such as 3D reconstructions.

尸冠病的患病率和形态学:常规腹部骨盆计算机断层扫描的系统研究。
目的:本研究利用常规门相增强腹部骨盆计算机断层扫描(CT)研究尸冠(cmori)的患病率、形态学和解剖学特征。尸冠是指髂外血管和腹壁下血管与闭孔血管结构的吻合处。手术过程中这些血管连接的意外损伤或盆腔外伤损伤可导致难以控制的盆腔出血。材料和方法:回顾性分析了2023年1月至4月期间进行的1593例腹部骨盆CT扫描。分析了患者的人口统计学、CMOR患病率、形态学和测量(包括血管直径和离耻骨联合的距离)。采用Rusu分类系统对CMOR进行分类,并记录动脉和静脉吻合情况。结果:49.3%的患者存在CMOR。静脉CMOR占34%,动脉CMOR占7.1%,其中5.8%的患者表现为动静脉联合吻合。右侧静脉血管直径平均为3.1 mm,左侧静脉血管直径平均为3.2 mm,性别差异显著(p=0.001)。耻骨联合至静脉CMOR的距离平均为63 mm。动脉吻合以1-2型为主(89.4%),静脉吻合以2-1型为主(72%)。结论:常规门相CT可有效识别和分类CMOR,为术前提供有价值的信息。双侧和对侧吻合是常见的,强调需要详细的解剖评估,以减少手术并发症。未来的研究可以通过先进的成像技术,如3D重建来增强检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia morphologica
Folia morphologica ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Folia Morphologica" is an official journal of the Polish Anatomical Society (a Constituent Member of European Federation for Experimental Morphology - EFEM). It contains original articles and reviews on morphology in the broadest sense (descriptive, experimental, and methodological). Papers dealing with practical application of morphological research to clinical problems may also be considered. Full-length papers as well as short research notes can be submitted. Descriptive papers dealing with non-mammals, cannot be accepted for publication with some exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信