AIFM-ed Curriculum Framework for Postgraduate Family Medicine Education on Artificial Intelligence: Mixed Methods Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Raymond Tolentino, Fanny Hersson-Edery, Mark Yaffe, Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi
{"title":"AIFM-ed Curriculum Framework for Postgraduate Family Medicine Education on Artificial Intelligence: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Raymond Tolentino, Fanny Hersson-Edery, Mark Yaffe, Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi","doi":"10.2196/66828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As health care moves to a more digital environment, there is a growing need to train future family doctors on the clinical uses of artificial intelligence (AI). However, family medicine training in AI has often been inconsistent or lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to develop a curriculum framework for family medicine postgraduate education on AI called \"Artificial Intelligence Training in Postgraduate Family Medicine Education\" (AIFM-ed).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, we conducted a comprehensive scoping review on existing AI education frameworks guided by the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping reviews. We adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting the results. Next, 2 national expert panels were conducted. Panelists included family medicine educators and residents knowledgeable in AI from family medicine residency programs across Canada. Participants were purposively sampled, and panels were held via Zoom, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analyzed using content analysis. We followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research for panels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An integration of the scoping review results and 2 panel discussions of 14 participants led to the development of the AIFM-ed curriculum framework for AI training in postgraduate family medicine education with five key elements: (1) need and purpose of the curriculum, (2) learning objectives, (3) curriculum content, (4) organization of curriculum content, and (5) implementation aspects of the curriculum.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the results of this study, we developed the AIFM-ed curriculum framework for AI training in postgraduate family medicine education. This framework serves as a structured guide for integrating AI competencies into medical education, ensuring that future family physicians are equipped with the necessary skills to use AI effectively in their clinical practice. Future research should focus on the validation and implementation of the AIFM-ed framework within family medicine education. Institutions also are encouraged to consider adapting the AIFM-ed framework within their own programs, tailoring it to meet the specific needs of their trainees and health care environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e66828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As health care moves to a more digital environment, there is a growing need to train future family doctors on the clinical uses of artificial intelligence (AI). However, family medicine training in AI has often been inconsistent or lacking.

Objective: The aim of the study is to develop a curriculum framework for family medicine postgraduate education on AI called "Artificial Intelligence Training in Postgraduate Family Medicine Education" (AIFM-ed).

Methods: First, we conducted a comprehensive scoping review on existing AI education frameworks guided by the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping reviews. We adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting the results. Next, 2 national expert panels were conducted. Panelists included family medicine educators and residents knowledgeable in AI from family medicine residency programs across Canada. Participants were purposively sampled, and panels were held via Zoom, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analyzed using content analysis. We followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research for panels.

Results: An integration of the scoping review results and 2 panel discussions of 14 participants led to the development of the AIFM-ed curriculum framework for AI training in postgraduate family medicine education with five key elements: (1) need and purpose of the curriculum, (2) learning objectives, (3) curriculum content, (4) organization of curriculum content, and (5) implementation aspects of the curriculum.

Conclusions: Using the results of this study, we developed the AIFM-ed curriculum framework for AI training in postgraduate family medicine education. This framework serves as a structured guide for integrating AI competencies into medical education, ensuring that future family physicians are equipped with the necessary skills to use AI effectively in their clinical practice. Future research should focus on the validation and implementation of the AIFM-ed framework within family medicine education. Institutions also are encouraged to consider adapting the AIFM-ed framework within their own programs, tailoring it to meet the specific needs of their trainees and health care environments.

基于aifm的家庭医学研究生人工智能教育课程框架:混合方法研究
背景:随着医疗保健转向更加数字化的环境,越来越需要对未来的家庭医生进行人工智能(AI)临床应用培训。然而,家庭医学在人工智能方面的培训往往不一致或缺乏。目的:研究的目的是开发一个基于人工智能的家庭医学研究生教育课程框架,即“家庭医学研究生教育中的人工智能培训”(AIFM-ed)。方法:首先,我们在Arksey和O'Malley以及Joanna Briggs研究所开发的范围审查方法框架的指导下,对现有的人工智能教育框架进行了全面的范围审查。我们遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目)清单报告结果。接下来,进行了2个国家专家小组。小组成员包括来自加拿大各地家庭医学住院医师项目的家庭医学教育者和了解人工智能的居民。有目的地对参与者进行抽样,并通过Zoom进行小组讨论,记录和转录。数据采用内容分析法进行分析。我们遵循小组定性研究报告标准。结果:综合范围评估结果和14名参与者的2次小组讨论,制定了以aifm为基础的家庭医学研究生人工智能培训课程框架,其中包括五个关键要素:(1)课程的需求和目的,(2)学习目标,(3)课程内容,(4)课程内容的组织,(5)课程的实施方面。结论:利用本研究的结果,我们开发了基于aifm的家庭医学研究生AI培训课程框架。该框架作为将人工智能能力整合到医学教育中的结构化指南,确保未来的家庭医生具备在临床实践中有效使用人工智能的必要技能。未来的研究应侧重于家庭医学教育中AIFM-ed框架的验证和实施。还鼓励各机构考虑在其自己的方案中调整由国际教育基金编制的框架,使之适合其受训人员和保健环境的具体需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信