Disparities in Heart Transplantation Allocation and Outcomes by Blood Type in Korea (2010-2022).

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kyung-Hee Kim, Byoung Geol Choi, Jin-Oh Choi, In-Cheol Kim, Jong-Chan Youn, Yang Hyun Cho, Hae-Young Lee, Sung-Ho Jung, Byung-Hee Oh
{"title":"Disparities in Heart Transplantation Allocation and Outcomes by Blood Type in Korea (2010-2022).","authors":"Kyung-Hee Kim, Byoung Geol Choi, Jin-Oh Choi, In-Cheol Kim, Jong-Chan Youn, Yang Hyun Cho, Hae-Young Lee, Sung-Ho Jung, Byung-Hee Oh","doi":"10.4070/kcj.2024.0281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to elucidate the influence of recipient blood type on heart transplant allocation dynamics in Korea, focusing on donor matching, wait times, and post-transplant survival from 2010 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 1,745 heart transplant recipients classified by blood types: A (n=631), B (n=488), AB (n=256), and O (n=370). Parameters studied encompassed donor and recipient ages, donor blood type compatibility, organ type, emergency status, waiting periods, and survival rates up to one year post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This investigation revealed significant disparities in the outcomes for heart transplant waitlist patients, differentiated by blood type. O recipients encountered notably extended median wait times of 110 days (an average of 300±514 days), which is substantially longer compared to A (65 days), B (58 days), and AB (29 days). Furthermore, the mortality rate for O recipients while on the waitlist was markedly high at 78.1%, in contrast to 75.2% for A, 72.3% for B, and 48.5% for AB. O recipients who, despite constituting a significant proportion of the donor pool (34.1%), received transplants at disproportionately lower rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Type O heart transplant recipients in Korea face significant challenges, including higher mortality rates during the waiting period and frequent necessity for left ventricular assist device interventions. Urgent policy reforms are needed to address these disparities and improve equitable organ allocation for blood type O patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17850,"journal":{"name":"Korean Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the influence of recipient blood type on heart transplant allocation dynamics in Korea, focusing on donor matching, wait times, and post-transplant survival from 2010 to 2022.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 1,745 heart transplant recipients classified by blood types: A (n=631), B (n=488), AB (n=256), and O (n=370). Parameters studied encompassed donor and recipient ages, donor blood type compatibility, organ type, emergency status, waiting periods, and survival rates up to one year post-transplant.

Results: This investigation revealed significant disparities in the outcomes for heart transplant waitlist patients, differentiated by blood type. O recipients encountered notably extended median wait times of 110 days (an average of 300±514 days), which is substantially longer compared to A (65 days), B (58 days), and AB (29 days). Furthermore, the mortality rate for O recipients while on the waitlist was markedly high at 78.1%, in contrast to 75.2% for A, 72.3% for B, and 48.5% for AB. O recipients who, despite constituting a significant proportion of the donor pool (34.1%), received transplants at disproportionately lower rates.

Conclusions: Type O heart transplant recipients in Korea face significant challenges, including higher mortality rates during the waiting period and frequent necessity for left ventricular assist device interventions. Urgent policy reforms are needed to address these disparities and improve equitable organ allocation for blood type O patients.

韩国心脏移植分配和结果的血型差异(2010-2022)。
背景和目的:本研究旨在阐明韩国受者血型对心脏移植分配动态的影响,重点关注2010年至2022年的供者匹配、等待时间和移植后生存。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们检查了1745名按血型分类的心脏移植受者:A型(631)、B型(488)、AB型(256)和O型(370)。研究的参数包括供体和受体年龄、供体血型相容性、器官类型、紧急状态、等待时间和移植后一年的存活率。结果:这项调查揭示了不同血型的心脏移植候诊患者在结果上的显著差异。O型患者的中位等待时间明显延长,为110天(平均300±514天),与A型患者(65天)、B型患者(58天)和AB型患者(29天)相比要长得多。此外,O型受者在等待名单上的死亡率明显很高,为78.1%,而A型受者为75.2%,B型受者为72.3%,AB型受者为48.5%。O型受者尽管在供体池中占很大比例(34.1%),但接受移植的比例却低得不成比例。结论:韩国O型心脏移植受者面临重大挑战,包括等待期较高的死亡率和频繁需要左心室辅助装置干预。需要紧急进行政策改革,以解决这些差异,并改善O型血患者器官的公平分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Circulation Journal
Korean Circulation Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
17.20%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Korean Circulation Journal is the official journal of the Korean Society of Cardiology, the Korean Pediatric Heart Society, the Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, and the Korean Society of Heart Failure. Abbreviated title is ''Korean Circ J''. Korean Circulation Journal, established in 1971, is a professional, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including original articles of basic research and clinical findings, review articles, editorials, images in cardiovascular medicine, and letters to the editor. Korean Circulation Journal is published monthly in English and publishes scientific and state-of-the-art clinical articles aimed at improving human health in general and contributing to the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in particular. The journal is published on the official website (https://e-kcj.org). It is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE, Web of Science), Scopus, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, KoreaMed, KoreaMed Synapse and KoMCI, and easily available to wide international researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信