Composite and inter-individual force and neuromuscular responses to a handgrip hold to failure anchored to a moderate perceptual intensity.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Minyoung Kwak, Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Clara J Mitchinson, Haley C Bergstrom
{"title":"Composite and inter-individual force and neuromuscular responses to a handgrip hold to failure anchored to a moderate perceptual intensity.","authors":"Minyoung Kwak, Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Clara J Mitchinson, Haley C Bergstrom","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16480-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE)-clamp model has allowed for the examination of unique physio-psychological fatigue mechanisms in humans. This study examined the time course of composite and inter-individual responses in force, electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude (AMP) and mean power frequency (MPF), and neuromuscular efficiency (NME) during a sustained, isometric handgrip hold to failure (HTF) anchored to RPE of 5 (RPE=5) on 0-10 omnibus-resistance RPE scale in females.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve females performed a handgrip HTF at RPE=5 while force (N), EMG and MMG AMP and MPF, and NME (normalized force/normalized EMG AMP) were recorded on the brachioradialis of the dominant arm. Separate, polynomial regression analyses were used to determine the individual and composite relationships for the normalized force, EMG and MMG AMP and MPF, and NME versus normalized time during the HTF at RPE=5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time to task failure for the handgrip HTF at RPE=5 was 585.3±445.6 sec. There were linear and quadratic decreases in force and neuromuscular parameters (P≤0.05) for the composite responses. However, there was inter-individual variability in the patterns of these responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To maintain a moderate perceptual intensity over time, it was necessary to voluntarily decrease force, muscle excitation, motor unit recruitment and firing rates, but there were also likely fatigue-induced, intramuscular, metabolic perturbations. However, the variability in force and neuromuscular responses suggested that these responses should be examined on a subject-by-subject basis to provide better insight into fatigue mechanisms across different conditions of RPE-clamp exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16480-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The application of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE)-clamp model has allowed for the examination of unique physio-psychological fatigue mechanisms in humans. This study examined the time course of composite and inter-individual responses in force, electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude (AMP) and mean power frequency (MPF), and neuromuscular efficiency (NME) during a sustained, isometric handgrip hold to failure (HTF) anchored to RPE of 5 (RPE=5) on 0-10 omnibus-resistance RPE scale in females.

Methods: Twelve females performed a handgrip HTF at RPE=5 while force (N), EMG and MMG AMP and MPF, and NME (normalized force/normalized EMG AMP) were recorded on the brachioradialis of the dominant arm. Separate, polynomial regression analyses were used to determine the individual and composite relationships for the normalized force, EMG and MMG AMP and MPF, and NME versus normalized time during the HTF at RPE=5.

Results: The time to task failure for the handgrip HTF at RPE=5 was 585.3±445.6 sec. There were linear and quadratic decreases in force and neuromuscular parameters (P≤0.05) for the composite responses. However, there was inter-individual variability in the patterns of these responses.

Conclusions: To maintain a moderate perceptual intensity over time, it was necessary to voluntarily decrease force, muscle excitation, motor unit recruitment and firing rates, but there were also likely fatigue-induced, intramuscular, metabolic perturbations. However, the variability in force and neuromuscular responses suggested that these responses should be examined on a subject-by-subject basis to provide better insight into fatigue mechanisms across different conditions of RPE-clamp exercise.

复合的和个体间的力量和神经肌肉对握握失败的反应锚定在中等知觉强度。
背景:运用感知疲劳等级(RPE)-钳模型,可以检查人类独特的生理-心理疲劳机制。本研究考察了在0-10综合阻力RPE量表中RPE为5 (RPE=5)时,持续等距握力(HTF)的复合反应和个体间反应的时间过程,包括力、肌电图(EMG)和肌力图(MMG)振幅(AMP)、平均工频(MPF)和神经肌肉效率(NME)。方法:12名女性在RPE=5时进行握力HTF,同时记录优势臂肱桡肌的力(N)、肌电图和MMG AMP、MPF、NME(归一化力/归一化肌电图AMP)。单独的多项式回归分析用于确定RPE=5时HTF期间归一化力、肌电图和MMG、AMP和MPF以及NME与归一化时间的个体和复合关系。结果:RPE=5时,手握HTF到任务失败的时间为585.3±445.6秒,复合反应的力和神经肌肉参数呈线性和二次型下降(P≤0.05)。然而,这些反应的模式存在个体间的差异。结论:为了在一段时间内保持适度的知觉强度,有必要自愿减少力量、肌肉兴奋、运动单位招募和射击率,但也可能存在疲劳引起的、肌肉内的、代谢的扰动。然而,力量和神经肌肉反应的可变性表明,这些反应应该在每个受试者的基础上进行检查,以便更好地了解不同条件下rpe夹紧运动的疲劳机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信