Using LDpred2 to adapt polygenic risk score techniques for methylation score creation.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Kristoffer Sandås, Leticia Spindola, Solveig Løkhammer, Anne-Kristin Stavrum, Ole Andreassen, Markos Tesfaye, Stéphanie Le Hellard
{"title":"Using LDpred2 to adapt polygenic risk score techniques for methylation score creation.","authors":"Kristoffer Sandås, Leticia Spindola, Solveig Løkhammer, Anne-Kristin Stavrum, Ole Andreassen, Markos Tesfaye, Stéphanie Le Hellard","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07222-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to determine if the R package LDpred2, designed for polygenic risk score creation for genome-wide association studies using summary statistics, could be adapted for deriving DNA methylation scores from methylome-wide association studies. Recognizing that linkage disequilibrium, used as prior in LDpred2, does not apply to methylation, we explored co-methylated regions and topologically associating domains as alternative structural priors for correlation between methylation sites. A genomic sliding-window approach was also tested. The performance of the LDpred2-based models was evaluated on methylation data from schizophrenia and control samples (N = 1,227).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LDpred2 models employing topologically associating domains and sliding window clusters as priors performed similarly to existing methods, explaining approximately 3.6% of schizophrenia phenotypic variance. The co-methylated regions model underperformed due to insufficient clustering of probes. The similarity in performance between the model using topologically associating domains and a null model consisting of random clusters suggests that the structural information provided by these domains enhances performance only marginally. In conclusion, while LDpred2 can be adapted for methylation data, it does not substantially enhance methylation score performance over existing methods, and the choice of structural prior may not be a critical factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07222-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to determine if the R package LDpred2, designed for polygenic risk score creation for genome-wide association studies using summary statistics, could be adapted for deriving DNA methylation scores from methylome-wide association studies. Recognizing that linkage disequilibrium, used as prior in LDpred2, does not apply to methylation, we explored co-methylated regions and topologically associating domains as alternative structural priors for correlation between methylation sites. A genomic sliding-window approach was also tested. The performance of the LDpred2-based models was evaluated on methylation data from schizophrenia and control samples (N = 1,227).

Results: LDpred2 models employing topologically associating domains and sliding window clusters as priors performed similarly to existing methods, explaining approximately 3.6% of schizophrenia phenotypic variance. The co-methylated regions model underperformed due to insufficient clustering of probes. The similarity in performance between the model using topologically associating domains and a null model consisting of random clusters suggests that the structural information provided by these domains enhances performance only marginally. In conclusion, while LDpred2 can be adapted for methylation data, it does not substantially enhance methylation score performance over existing methods, and the choice of structural prior may not be a critical factor.

使用LDpred2适应多基因风险评分技术创建甲基化评分。
目的:本研究旨在确定R包LDpred2是否适用于从甲基组全关联研究中获得DNA甲基化评分,LDpred2是为全基因组关联研究使用汇总统计创建多基因风险评分而设计的。认识到在LDpred2中作为先验的连锁不平衡并不适用于甲基化,我们探索了共甲基化区域和拓扑相关结构域作为甲基化位点之间相关的替代结构先验。还测试了基因组滑动窗口方法。基于ldpred2的模型的性能通过来自精神分裂症和对照样本(N = 1,227)的甲基化数据进行评估。结果:LDpred2模型采用拓扑关联域和滑动窗口聚类作为先验,与现有方法相似,解释了约3.6%的精神分裂症表型变异。由于探针聚类不足,共甲基化区域模型表现不佳。使用拓扑关联域的模型和由随机聚类组成的空模型在性能上的相似性表明,这些域提供的结构信息只能轻微地提高性能。综上所述,尽管LDpred2可以适用于甲基化数据,但与现有方法相比,它并没有显著提高甲基化评分的性能,结构先验的选择可能不是关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信