Sivan Farladansky-Gershnabel, Liron Kariv, Hanoch Schreiber, Dorit Ravid, Gal Cohen, Tal Biron-Shental, Michal Kovo, Racheli Edelman Krivoshey, Shmuel Arnon
{"title":"Targeting risk factors for false-positive outcomes in newborn hearing screening: a focus on mode of delivery - a case-control study.","authors":"Sivan Farladansky-Gershnabel, Liron Kariv, Hanoch Schreiber, Dorit Ravid, Gal Cohen, Tal Biron-Shental, Michal Kovo, Racheli Edelman Krivoshey, Shmuel Arnon","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09428-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Otoacoustic emission (OAE) is a widely utilized method for screening newborns for congenital hearing loss. While OAE-based screening has high sensitivity, it is associated with high false-positive rates when conducted shortly after birth. Previous studies found that infants delivered by cesarean section show higher false-positive rates. Nonetheless, other modes of delivery have not been investigated to date. This study aims to evaluate the impact of maternal, neonatal, and perinatal factors on hearing screening false-positive results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 5,621 infants with normal hearing. Infants were divided into two groups: those who failed the initial OAE hearing screening were assigned to the study group, and those who passed were assigned to the control group. Maternal, neonatal, and perinatal factors were extracted from medical records and analyzed to assess possible associations with failing the initial OAE screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 365 out of 5621 (6.5%) neonates failed the initial OAE hearing screening. The study group had a higher prevalence of infants delivered by elective or emergency cesarean section, as well as by vacuum-assisted delivery, compared to the control group. Multivariate analysis showed that the mode of delivery had a significant effect on false-positive results, with odds ratios of 15.5, 7.2, and 8.6 for infants born by elective cesarean section, emergency cesarean section, and vacuum delivery, respectively, compared to vaginal delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infants delivered by cesarean section or vacuum extraction have higher odds of failing the initial OAE screening when conducted within 48-72 h after birth. Further research is needed to determine the optimal timing for hearing screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"5073-5079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09428-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Otoacoustic emission (OAE) is a widely utilized method for screening newborns for congenital hearing loss. While OAE-based screening has high sensitivity, it is associated with high false-positive rates when conducted shortly after birth. Previous studies found that infants delivered by cesarean section show higher false-positive rates. Nonetheless, other modes of delivery have not been investigated to date. This study aims to evaluate the impact of maternal, neonatal, and perinatal factors on hearing screening false-positive results.
Methods: This retrospective study included 5,621 infants with normal hearing. Infants were divided into two groups: those who failed the initial OAE hearing screening were assigned to the study group, and those who passed were assigned to the control group. Maternal, neonatal, and perinatal factors were extracted from medical records and analyzed to assess possible associations with failing the initial OAE screening.
Results: A total of 365 out of 5621 (6.5%) neonates failed the initial OAE hearing screening. The study group had a higher prevalence of infants delivered by elective or emergency cesarean section, as well as by vacuum-assisted delivery, compared to the control group. Multivariate analysis showed that the mode of delivery had a significant effect on false-positive results, with odds ratios of 15.5, 7.2, and 8.6 for infants born by elective cesarean section, emergency cesarean section, and vacuum delivery, respectively, compared to vaginal delivery.
Conclusion: Infants delivered by cesarean section or vacuum extraction have higher odds of failing the initial OAE screening when conducted within 48-72 h after birth. Further research is needed to determine the optimal timing for hearing screening.
期刊介绍：
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
